"Normal" frequency separation or Wavelet decomposition

vojern

Well-known member
Messages
100
Reaction score
11
This weekend I found a plug-in for Gimp which provides a special form of frequency separation; see this article.

I find that it delivers more control than the "normal" frequency separation process, where only one texture layer and one color layer is used. I used a separation of 10 layers, which make it for instance possible to remove freckles in minutes. See the subtle change in this portrait:

Original
Original

Edited with wavelet decomposition
Edited with wavelet decomposition

PS1: for the "normal" frequency separation process I use this method for Paintshop Pro (X6)

PS2: I couldn't find an equivalent for the wavelet decomposition with Paintshop Pro. Although Gimp is easy to use, I wouldn't like to add another piece of software to my workflow if there is an alternative for Paintshop Pro.
 
Last edited:
This weekend I found a plug-in for Gimp which provides a special form of frequency separation; see this article.

I find that it delivers more control than the "normal" frequency separation process, where only one texture layer and one color layer is used. I used a separation of 10 layers, which make it for instance possible to remove freckles in minutes. See the subtle change in this portrait:

PS1: for the "normal" frequency separation process I use this method for Paintshop Pro (X6)

PS2: I couldn't find an equivalent for the wavelet decomposition with Paintshop Pro. Although Gimp is easy to use, I wouldn't like to add another piece of software to my workflow if there is an alternative for Paintshop Pro.
Thank for the tip, never done this, but looks interesting and time to learn something new...

Thanks!

;-)
 
Hmm, interesting. I guess the key is the "grain merge" layer capability. If there is a way to simulate this, then Im sure you could create your own Wavelet script. Instead of having two layers, you could make several layers with varying degrees of gaussean blur?

It is likely more trouble than its worth. I might try downloading GIMP, just to get this feature in an easy to use way. Or, just try to figure out the two-frequency version of PSP...it looks like it gives pretty good results already.
 
a783e40dae454871a5bc05e6d2b23ad2.jpg

A "Peano" tuit from ages ago. Adobe CS3 vintage. Duplicate layer/invert. High pass filter/Gaussian blur. Apply through black mask. Easy when you know how. Leaves the skin texture. Thank you Peano. :-) Vic
 
Last edited:
ACR for instance.

I'll grant it looks like the difference between Memorial Day and Labor Day. :)
I'll grant it looks like the difference between Memorial Day and Labor Day. :)



--
Photons by the bag.
Gravitons no longer shipped outside US or Canada
-----.....------
You got a camera, now go out and get a life; or at least a picture of one!
 
A "Peano" tut from ages ago.
Peano was the best! Also one of the most generous. I miss him both here and at Model Mayhem.
 
This weekend I found a plug-in for Gimp which provides a special form of frequency separation; see this article.

I find that it delivers more control than the "normal" frequency separation process, where only one texture layer and one color layer is used. I used a separation of 10 layers, which make it for instance possible to remove freckles in minutes. See the subtle change in this portrait:

Original
Original

Edited with wavelet decomposition
Edited with wavelet decomposition

PS1: for the "normal" frequency separation process I use this method for Paintshop Pro (X6)

PS2: I couldn't find an equivalent for the wavelet decomposition with Paintshop Pro. Although Gimp is easy to use, I wouldn't like to add another piece of software to my workflow if there is an alternative for Paintshop Pro.
There is an action that uses frequency seperation but uses way more layers to edit.
 
a783e40dae454871a5bc05e6d2b23ad2.jpg

A "Peano" tuit from ages ago. Adobe CS3 vintage. Duplicate layer/invert. High pass filter/Gaussian blur. Apply through black mask. Easy when you know how. Leaves the skin texture. Thank you Peano. :-) Vic
Nah, that doesn't do it for me. The skin is waxed.
 
ACR for instance.

I'll grant it looks like the difference between Memorial Day and Labor Day. :)
I'll grant it looks like the difference between Memorial Day and Labor Day. :)

--
Photons by the bag.
Gravitons no longer shipped outside US or Canada
-----.....------
You got a camera, now go out and get a life; or at least a picture of one!
Sorry, looks like an overexposed photo now
 
ACR for instance.

I'll grant it looks like the difference between Memorial Day and Labor Day. :)
I'll grant it looks like the difference between Memorial Day and Labor Day. :)

--
Photons by the bag.
Gravitons no longer shipped outside US or Canada
-----.....------
You got a camera, now go out and get a life; or at least a picture of one!
Sorry, looks like an overexposed photo now
check your monitor settings.

It is lighter, but I said that in the caption, about a .35 plus on the exposure if I recall.

the rest of the apparent lightening probably comes from the reduced contrast.

aside from what I mentioned, there were no brightness or levels changes made.

--
Photons by the bag.
Gravitons no longer shipped outside US or Canada
-----.....------
You got a camera, now go out and get a life; or at least a picture of one!
 
Hi,

You can get Wavelets Decomposition for Photoshop in Fixel Detailizer 2 PS.



It really fast...
 
Looks like it works well! Good to know
O I feel so bad...I did not use the wavelet tool. I simple did a bit of sharp - dodging - adjustment brush for shadows/highlights. Then PS the healing brush for the large blemishes. Then very gentle Port. Pro 12 with care not to make the skin waxy. U can still see some pores. This took about 15 mins max. Again, I'm sorry if anyone thought this was done with the wavelets exclusively. I saw that some other contributors had done some other retouching and I thought it was fair game. I will sit in the corner until tomorrow. :)
 
vojern, post: 54738684, member: 672300"]
Looks like it works well! Good to know
O I feel so bad...I did not use the wavelet tool. I simple did a bit of sharp - dodging - adjustment brush for shadows/highlights. Then PS the healing brush for the large blemishes. Then very gentle Port. Pro 12 with care not to make the skin waxy. U can still see some pores. This took about 15 mins max. Again, I'm sorry if anyone thought this was done with the wavelets exclusively. I saw that some other contributors had done some other retouching and I thought it was fair game. I will sit in the corner until tomorrow. :)
[/QUOTE]
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top