Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
--the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
Do a search in this forum if you want to read the full discussions.
They go back 18 months now.
The truth is in the image. However, as you indicated in the Mark's
thread, you see the 10D image as superior. Fair enough. Buy it and
enjoy it.
Laurence
--the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
http://www.pbase.com/lmatson/sd9_images
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/root
http://www.beachbriss.com (eternal test site)
The example posted was typical of the 10D shots taken with the L lens.10D on the fountain then I would say the results of the 10D are
dissapointing (or it is all Mark's fault).
the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
--the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
You might read this thread if you haven't yet:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1027&message=5348279
(SD-9 Arrived Yesterday by Mark Boy on this forum)
Here are the TOP TEN reasons for choosing the 10D over the SD9:
10. I get more megapixels for the mega bucks.
9. I won't irritate my hand rubbing it over Canon's silky smooth
images.
The snake in the SD9 picture was so life-like it bit my hand.
8. I am down to my last disposable camera and need a new line.
7. I was a computer systems manager in the 70's and 80's and I
always bought IBM
6. More people shoot the Canon so it has to be better. I follow
the herd.
5. Everyone knows Sigma lenses Scuck.
4. Accurate AF is important to me. I own the ruler company that
Canon now packages with their 10D.
3. The Canon forum has nicer people and nicer posts.
2. The NRA recommends it (because of the name).
AND THE NUMBER ONE REASON TO CHOOSE CANON 10D:
1. My handle has the word "IDIOT" in it.
Now please don't take it personally, buy your 10D and have a lot of
fun. I have seen some great pictures from it.
--the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
.......Feel The Power.........Sigma.....SD9..........
http://www.lightreflection.com
http://www.silveroaksranch.com
http://www.pbase.com/rickdecker
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/user_home
It shows.
I was going to buy an SD9 to test it out. I changed my mind.
You might read this thread if you haven't yet:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1027&message=5348279
(SD-9 Arrived Yesterday by Mark Boy on this forum)
Here are the TOP TEN reasons for choosing the 10D over the SD9:
10. I get more megapixels for the mega bucks.
9. I won't irritate my hand rubbing it over Canon's silky smooth
images.
The snake in the SD9 picture was so life-like it bit my hand.
8. I am down to my last disposable camera and need a new line.
7. I was a computer systems manager in the 70's and 80's and I
always bought IBM
6. More people shoot the Canon so it has to be better. I follow
the herd.
5. Everyone knows Sigma lenses Scuck.
4. Accurate AF is important to me. I own the ruler company that
Canon now packages with their 10D.
3. The Canon forum has nicer people and nicer posts.
2. The NRA recommends it (because of the name).
AND THE NUMBER ONE REASON TO CHOOSE CANON 10D:
1. My handle has the word "IDIOT" in it.
Now please don't take it personally, buy your 10D and have a lot of
fun. I have seen some great pictures from it.
--the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
.......Feel The Power.........Sigma.....SD9..........
http://www.lightreflection.com
http://www.silveroaksranch.com
http://www.pbase.com/rickdecker
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/user_home
--It shows.
I was going to buy an SD9 to test it out. I changed my mind.
You might read this thread if you haven't yet:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1027&message=5348279
(SD-9 Arrived Yesterday by Mark Boy on this forum)
Here are the TOP TEN reasons for choosing the 10D over the SD9:
10. I get more megapixels for the mega bucks.
9. I won't irritate my hand rubbing it over Canon's silky smooth
images.
The snake in the SD9 picture was so life-like it bit my hand.
8. I am down to my last disposable camera and need a new line.
7. I was a computer systems manager in the 70's and 80's and I
always bought IBM
6. More people shoot the Canon so it has to be better. I follow
the herd.
5. Everyone knows Sigma lenses Scuck.
4. Accurate AF is important to me. I own the ruler company that
Canon now packages with their 10D.
3. The Canon forum has nicer people and nicer posts.
2. The NRA recommends it (because of the name).
AND THE NUMBER ONE REASON TO CHOOSE CANON 10D:
1. My handle has the word "IDIOT" in it.
Now please don't take it personally, buy your 10D and have a lot of
fun. I have seen some great pictures from it.
--the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
.......Feel The Power.........Sigma.....SD9..........
http://www.lightreflection.com
http://www.silveroaksranch.com
http://www.pbase.com/rickdecker
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/user_home
--But seriously, I thought the fence and the foliage in the
comparison clearly gives the 10D's picture a better one overall.
Now a serious question. And I might be a convert too.
If you up sample an SD9 image to 6MP and 12MP, you say the image is
better than S2 and D10 ?
It shows.
I was going to buy an SD9 to test it out. I changed my mind.
You might read this thread if you haven't yet:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1027&message=5348279
(SD-9 Arrived Yesterday by Mark Boy on this forum)
Here are the TOP TEN reasons for choosing the 10D over the SD9:
10. I get more megapixels for the mega bucks.
9. I won't irritate my hand rubbing it over Canon's silky smooth
images.
The snake in the SD9 picture was so life-like it bit my hand.
8. I am down to my last disposable camera and need a new line.
7. I was a computer systems manager in the 70's and 80's and I
always bought IBM
6. More people shoot the Canon so it has to be better. I follow
the herd.
5. Everyone knows Sigma lenses Scuck.
4. Accurate AF is important to me. I own the ruler company that
Canon now packages with their 10D.
3. The Canon forum has nicer people and nicer posts.
2. The NRA recommends it (because of the name).
AND THE NUMBER ONE REASON TO CHOOSE CANON 10D:
1. My handle has the word "IDIOT" in it.
Now please don't take it personally, buy your 10D and have a lot of
fun. I have seen some great pictures from it.
--the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
.......Feel The Power.........Sigma.....SD9..........
http://www.lightreflection.com
http://www.silveroaksranch.com
http://www.pbase.com/rickdecker
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/user_home
--I was teasing too guys.
But seriously, I thought the fence and the foliage in the
comparison clearly gives the 10D's picture a better one overall.
Now a serious question. And I might be a convert too.
If you up sample an SD9 image to 6MP and 12MP, you say the image is
better than S2 and D10 ?
Hey. The only person I know like that is Brenden, a.k.a. "group idiot". He's not a bad sort, aside from giving up Nikon for Canon, and drooling all over the pictures of the new Leica back...1. My handle has the word "IDIOT" in it.
I'm not sure how spreading out the red, green, and blue sensors,
which adds the requirement to interpolate both pixel color and
position and results in spatial and mathematical artifacts, plus
the need for a blur filter could ever make image quality better.
I viewed a lot of images and played with the software before
choosing. The SD-9's 14MP RAW output was substantially smoother,
more precise, and completely artifact free. The Canon's
interpolated 6MP image showed too much blur for this amount of
money, as well as noticably lower resolution.
The Foveon sensor still has some growing pains, and the 10D was a
close second place in front of the D100 then S2, but in the end the
SD-9's pristine image quality was too strong to overlook. It
didn't hurt that I got an SD-9, a 24-70mm, a 70-300mm, and an
EF-500 flash, shipped, for the same cost as a 10D body... ...but
that's not why I picked the Sigma.
the SD9.
for the same money, I'll take 10D
unless the next version gives me 6MP, for the same money
--Hey. The only person I know like that is Brenden, a.k.a. "group1. My handle has the word "IDIOT" in it.
idiot". He's not a bad sort, aside from giving up Nikon for Canon,
and drooling all over the pictures of the new Leica back...
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/postersprofile.asp?poster=hjivigilhlig
--
Ciao!
Joe
Except who ever said it was creative?Maybe even
recognize their creativity!!