D3300 vs D5200 (18-55 VRII) question.

jvp4ant

New member
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello to everybody.

I owned a Lumix g3 camera making some pictures (I dont consider my self as a pro or anything) mostly of friends and cause I like it as hobby. Never took money for the pics I made simply creating nice pictures for friends.

So as the time passed by I found my self in need in a new camera. I sold the old one I had and now I am in between D3300 and D5200. Well mostly cause thats what I can afford

D3300 at the cost of 475eur (600$) and D5200 at the cost of 550eur (~700$). Both bodies are included with 18-55 VR II lens

I won't ask whats the better one as this is for the needs of the user so I am simply going to write what I need from my camera and mostly what are the pros (at least as I found them over the past last days on Internet).

So first of all I want my camera for shooting INDOORs (portraits mostly) and eventualy OUTDOORs (landscape pics). I wont be using it so much to take pics of moving objects etc.. for that I will use the video if needed.

The pros I found and been told are the following

D3300 +

Ligther and more compact (430gr vs 555gr)
Latest model (2014 vs 2012)
Exspeed 4 (vs Exspeed 3)
75€ cheaper (475 vs 550) or 100$ if u prefer

D5200 +
39 focus points (vs 11) with 9 cross focus points instead of 1
Flip out screen

Been also told that the D3300 dont has a AA filter and D5200 has. I am not sure whether to put that as a PRO as some say its better in photogragy without that but some say its a must when you are shooting video. Also told (from an owner of D3200 and D5200) that the focusing is so much slower on D3200 especially at night. (Dont know if the same applies to D3300).

Last question is that.. is it worth the extra $$ for buying a 18-105 kit? I will shoot mostly indoors so the zoom wont be used much but I think the most zoom you pull the more better is the foreground (the model eventually) and the more disturbed is the backround (blurry) and thats kind what a portrait need.

Thank you in advance for the answers and sorry for my bad english.
 
Hello to everybody.

I owned a Lumix g3 camera making some pictures (I dont consider my self as a pro or anything) mostly of friends and cause I like it as hobby. Never took money for the pics I made simply creating nice pictures for friends.

So as the time passed by I found my self in need in a new camera. I sold the old one I had and now I am in between D3300 and D5200. Well mostly cause thats what I can afford

D3300 at the cost of 475eur (600$) and D5200 at the cost of 550eur (~700$). Both bodies are included with 18-55 VR II lens

I won't ask whats the better one as this is for the needs of the user so I am simply going to write what I need from my camera and mostly what are the pros (at least as I found them over the past last days on Internet).

So first of all I want my camera for shooting INDOORs (portraits mostly) and eventualy OUTDOORs (landscape pics). I wont be using it so much to take pics of moving objects etc.. for that I will use the video if needed.

The pros I found and been told are the following

D3300 +

Ligther and more compact (430gr vs 555gr)
Latest model (2014 vs 2012)
Exspeed 4 (vs Exspeed 3)
75€ cheaper (475 vs 550) or 100$ if u prefer

D5200 +
39 focus points (vs 11) with 9 cross focus points instead of 1
Flip out screen

Been also told that the D3300 dont has a AA filter and D5200 has. I am not sure whether to put that as a PRO as some say its better in photogragy without that but some say its a must when you are shooting video. Also told (from an owner of D3200 and D5200) that the focusing is so much slower on D3200 especially at night. (Dont know if the same applies to D3300).

Last question is that.. is it worth the extra $$ for buying a 18-105 kit? I will shoot mostly indoors so the zoom wont be used much but I think the most zoom you pull the more better is the foreground (the model eventually) and the more disturbed is the backround (blurry) and thats kind what a portrait need.

Thank you in advance for the answers and sorry for my bad english.
No, for what you need, you do not need to pay extra money for the 18-105mm lens. The 18-55mm kit lens that comes with the D3300 seems perfect for your needs.

You could buy, later on, an extra lens for portraits, the 35mm or the 50mm F1.8G for about $200.

Good luck!
 
With either camera the 18-55 VR2 is preferred over the 18-105. If you want more reach for outdoors, get 55-200, 55-300, 70-300. Nikon still has "Special Pricing" with $100-$150-$200 off the price of the 3 lens.

You also get the same choice if you step up to D5300 from D5200. Your choice which way to go. You could also wait a bit to see what holiday sales Nikon offers.
 
Thank your for taking the time to answer me

I took the 18-55 VRII lens

So for portraits .. Some say the 50 some the 35.. what should I go for?

nikon af-s nikkor 50mm f/1.8g lens vs nikon af-s dx nikkor 35mm f/1.8g lens

Thank you in advance
 
So for portraits .. Some say the 50 some the 35.. what should I go for?

nikon af-s nikkor 50mm f/1.8g lens vs nikon af-s dx nikkor 35mm f/1.8g lens
I've tried both lenses for portraits with my Nikon DX camera and found that the 50/1.8G provides a more comfortable distance (which also affects the look of the face) and renders slightly better bokeh.

You can try taking portraits with the 18-55 VR II as well. I've done so with the 18-140 with pleasing results -- the focal lengths varied between 50 and 120, usually at f/4-5.6. Try it. ;)

Unless you want certain artistic effects, you rarely shoot portraits "wide open" because you need enough DOF to keep enough facial details in focus. Nevertheless, it is always good to have "fast" prime lenses, and those 35 and 50 are sharp sharp sharp.
 
Last edited:
Thank your for taking the time to answer me

I took the 18-55 VRII lens

So for portraits .. Some say the 50 some the 35.. what should I go for?

nikon af-s nikkor 50mm f/1.8g lens vs nikon af-s dx nikkor 35mm f/1.8g lens

Thank you in advance
I agree with the previous post, the 50mm lens is slightly preferable for portraits. I sold my 50mm lens and bought the 35mm lens and I miss the additional 15mm. I just might buy the 50mm lens again. But I'm sure some people might prefer the 35mm lens, especially if in a limited environment (space).
 
I think you will also find that it is the D5300 that has had the AA filter removed a la D7100 rather than the D5200. Echoing others: the 18-55 VR II kit lens is a nice unit and provides sharp photos indoors. If you do want to move outdoors and take photos of people at longer distances you may want to consider a lens with more reach, however. More zoom is also nice for getting candid close-ups indoors (or outdoors) without drawing attention to yourself so that's something else to consider.

--
https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/105219675253032708516/albums
(Ed)
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top