dear NIKON .

tell the truth ,

if NIKON release a dSLR with some specs like this , don't you think that my 'we' combine you ???
You should have used "I" instead of "WE" as I am not sure if you are the spoke person of whatever group?
This is called "editorial 'we'" and is an established and OK way to write.
 
Peace for all ,

A lot of rumors flying everywhere about a d700 replacment ,

someone agrees , other refuses , but i think it will be a logical step from NIKON .

Really we miss an FF body with medium resolution , good buffer , high ISO performance , good AF and tracking ... , best then the d700 , in a logical price .

we can't find all of that in the d600/610 or the d800/800e/810 either .

we want a d710 with :

- d810 body .

- d810 video features .

- d4s sensor .

- d4s AF .

- Df ISO performance .

- price under 3000$ .

Is that a big dream ? dear NIKON .
I paid in the past nearly 6000 on my D3... soon very soon the D700 was released.

Then I paid nearly 6000 on a D4. I DO hope the same never ever happens again.

I do agree though we need something better than the Canon Mk3, for less than 3000 Euros.
The Canon 5D MkIII's list price is €3300. In Nikon made something better (it already has, by the way), why would it give it a list price less the €3000? And in what sense do you 'need' it, or are you confusing 'want' and 'need'?
 
Last edited:
Also free of QC issues

Sort out Nikon Repair Service and turnaround of issues.

4K Video Internal / External output - not likely...
 
in some cases and untill now , that is right , but you will see in the future another rules for shoosing cameras .

on ML , a lot of things is going to be better :

1 - AF - tracking
May be, as least potential here. But DSLR in MLUP mode is pretty much the same as ML and indeed can employ the same technique for AF tracking
2- ISO perfomane
Never - chip with continuous reading cannot beat one with once off reading in ISO and noise department, as least theoretically. ML ISO may be as close as one like to be to DSLR ISO, but I fail to see any physics at all why it should be better, even at smallest margin.
3- video features
Ditto #2, MLUP and it became the same
4- small , light weight
Yes, it bound to be smaller, lighter and cheaper otherwise who need it???
5- more lenses
WTF? Unless you mean foreign lenses with an adapter, I cannot get what you talking about.
..... etc
And please elaborate
ML will be the real enemy for dSLR for a lot of us in the future .
This is the same paranoid delusion as in your OP. All what ML can offer over DSLR is being smaller, lighter and cheaper. Cheaper! CHeaper!! CHEaper!!! CHEAper!!! CHEAPer!!!! CHEAPEr!!!!! CHEAPER!!!!!!

This is all about (as well as in your OP) - to dream about Ferrari at Daewoo price. Unfortunately will not happens.

Have a good dreaming (you know some substances could make it easier and more colorful).
 
Peace for all ,

A lot of rumors flying everywhere about a d700 replacment ,

someone agrees , other refuses , but i think it will be a logical step from NIKON .

Really we miss an FF body with medium resolution , good buffer , high ISO performance , good AF and tracking ... , best then the d700 , in a logical price .

we can't find all of that in the d600/610 or the d800/800e/810 either .

we want a d710 with :

- d810 body .

- d810 video features .

- d4s sensor .

- d4s AF .

- Df ISO performance .

- price under 3000$ .

Is that a big dream ? dear NIKON .
I paid in the past nearly 6000 on my D3... soon very soon the D700 was released.

Then I paid nearly 6000 on a D4. I DO hope the same never ever happens again.

I do agree though we need something better than the Canon Mk3, for less than 3000 Euros.
The Canon 5D MkIII's list price is €3300. In Nikon made something better (it already has, by the way), why would it give it a list price less the €3000? And in what sense do you 'need' it, or are you confusing 'want' and 'need'?
 
Dear Wassim al Malak,
We hear you. We are going to release the D750 soon which will satisfy most of your requests above. You have asked for 16mp sensor, we are giving you more in the form of a 24 MP sensor.

Regards,

Nikon.
I was thinking more like:

"Yo, Wassim! What's happenin', bro?!

Bro, you should have gotten back to us earlier. We've done all this market research what the photographic community wants and we think we effin' nailed it with the upcoming D750. But, no worries homie, we're gonna scrap it. If it's what you want, let's be honest - it's what everyone wants. We'll make one for you, exactly like you want it, we all already pulled all of our engineers from other projects, basically everything in the entire company is on hold til we make your camera.

$3,000, whaaaa? Just because it's D810 body and D4s sensor, doesn't mean we can't lower our prices just for you, bro! We were thinking.. wait for it.. wait for it.. $1,999! BOOOM! (everyone's high-fiving in the office)

But, wait, there's more!

How does a special "thank you" card sound, signed by Makoto Kimura himself? That's what you get for showing us the way and for being a loyal customer. Yeah? That's what we thought, baby! BRING IT IN! (virtual hug)

Love,
Nikon Japan (where it's at!)"
 
Peace for all ,

A lot of rumors flying everywhere about a d700 replacment ,

someone agrees , other refuses , but i think it will be a logical step from NIKON .

Really we miss an FF body with medium resolution , good buffer , high ISO performance , good AF and tracking ... , best then the d700 , in a logical price .

we can't find all of that in the d600/610 or the d800/800e/810 either .

we want a d710 with :

- d810 body .

- d810 video features .

- d4s sensor .

- d4s AF .

- Df ISO performance .

- price under 3000$ .

Is that a big dream ? dear NIKON .
I paid in the past nearly 6000 on my D3... soon very soon the D700 was released.

Then I paid nearly 6000 on a D4. I DO hope the same never ever happens again.

I do agree though we need something better than the Canon Mk3, for less than 3000 Euros.
The Canon 5D MkIII's list price is €3300. In Nikon made something better (it already has, by the way), why would it give it a list price less the €3000? And in what sense do you 'need' it, or are you confusing 'want' and 'need'?
 
Never happen. All I want is the flip-down AI tab from the Df [and some older film bodies]. They should put it on every body that costs over $2000.

Or offer a service to update my D810 w/ the Df AI ring.

Or sell me the Df AI ring and I'll figure out how to install it.
Why not simply buy Df????
Because the Df doesn't have other things that I wanted [like excellent AF]. And it has a retro-look that I was gonna tire of fast.

I still have a couple of old Nikon F bodies that I can take out and hold for a few minutes to remember why I don't want to hold them for a few hours... :-)
 
i wonder how a photographer can speak like you !!!

thanks for your not-funny reply .
 
[No message]
 
Humor is always related to culture. I don't mean to suggest that you don't have "culture", but that your culture is different.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top