petebuster
Leading Member
Hi everyone Peter from the UK here, new to this forum.
My main interest is wildlife photography, up to recently ive used a canon 60d and sigma 100-400 f4 i wanted to upgrade but really can't afford it at the moment so decided to go back to a bridge camera. I was a bit susceptible to the s1 having read a few negatives about the IQ but i liked the look of it and the weather sealing so as i found one at a good price i took the plunge.
I wasn't happy with the lack of hood and charging the battery in camera but so far haven't been unhappy with the IQ so would welcome other peoples thoughts, i was going to get the panny z200 but 50x is better for wildlife, have added a couple of images no pp



My main interest is wildlife photography, up to recently ive used a canon 60d and sigma 100-400 f4 i wanted to upgrade but really can't afford it at the moment so decided to go back to a bridge camera. I was a bit susceptible to the s1 having read a few negatives about the IQ but i liked the look of it and the weather sealing so as i found one at a good price i took the plunge.
I wasn't happy with the lack of hood and charging the battery in camera but so far haven't been unhappy with the IQ so would welcome other peoples thoughts, i was going to get the panny z200 but 50x is better for wildlife, have added a couple of images no pp



Last edited:



