A6000 softer on right side?

the object in this exercise is to find out if the soft side ever gets in clear focus, not to compare the sides.

if the soft side never gets in clear focus with any lens, it's definitely something weird.
I find that the right hand side goes get in reasonable focus with stopped down images.
correct, and it's screwing up the test results.

it needs to shot wide open.
The softness is really only evident with the first image
because the second image is stopped down more.

stopping down increases the dof.

to recap, you shot the same 50mm on two different cameras, and both pics were weaker on the right-hand edge, which indicates a lens problem.

the zoom shot was oof across the entire frame, it can't be used.
 
You mislabed some of the photo captions if the EXIF's are true, however yes the NEX-7 + 50mm 1.8 looks far far better than A6000 with same lens. Talk about the amount of crap you need to worry about...can we get some better QC.
 
the object in this exercise is to find out if the soft side ever gets in clear focus, not to compare the sides.

if the soft side never gets in clear focus with any lens, it's definitely something weird.
I find that the right hand side goes get in reasonable focus with stopped down images.
correct, and it's screwing up the test results.

it needs to shot wide open.
The softness is really only evident with the first image
because the second image is stopped down more.

stopping down increases the dof.

to recap, you shot the same 50mm on two different cameras, and both pics were weaker on the right-hand edge, which indicates a lens problem.

the zoom shot was oof across the entire frame, it can't be used.
 
definitely bad q.c. somewhere! i'm thinking lens, at the minimum, but i see how there could be an issue with the camera body as well.
 
definitely bad q.c. somewhere! i'm thinking lens, at the minimum, but i see how there could be an issue with the camera body as well.
My initial assumption was that it was a lens problem, but I'm now reasonably certain it's (mainly) a camera problem. The lenses may not be perfect, but the NEX-7 images all seem pretty good, so it's the a6000 that's the main culprit.
 
You mislabed some of the photo captions if the EXIF's are true, however yes the NEX-7 + 50mm 1.8 looks far far better than A6000 with same lens. Talk about the amount of crap you need to worry about...can we get some better QC.
The images are all OOC JPEGs, so the Exifs are all authentic. I can't spot any incorrect captions, but it's certainly possible that I mix edited them.

Yes, it's a pain to have to test both lenses and cameras now. I've never previously had a camera that was bad enough for me to spot faults (apart from the badly stuck-on rubber grips on my NEX-7, but at least that didn't affect functionality or IQ). At least I was careful to buy from Amazon, not a Hong Kong discounter.
 
definitely bad q.c. somewhere! i'm thinking lens, at the minimum, but i see how there could be an issue with the camera body as well.
No, it's definitely the camera: the same lenses produce sharper images on the NEX-7. Perhaps they're not perfect, either, but the faults are not nearly so visible in NEX-7 images. Of course, at f/8 both cameras produce very similar results, but as the DoF gets shallower, the apparent sensor misalignment in the a6000 becomes more apparent.
 
This isn't happening on the right side. It is happening at the bottom of the frame. This measn that it could be a result of vertical shutter performance. The only other idea that I have is a misaligned lens mount or sensor.
 
Just for fun, take one shot normally, then take the second shot with the camera inverted. Do the problem areas move from the right side to the left side?

-Ross
 
This isn't happening on the right side. It is happening at the bottom of the frame. This measn that it could be a result of vertical shutter performance. The only other idea that I have is a misaligned lens mount or sensor.
Yes, I think it's probably a misaligned sensor. I'm wondering if the sensor isn't seated properly in its mount? If it was a misaligned lens mount, wouldn't there be other signs?
 
Just for fun, take one shot normally, then take the second shot with the camera inverted. Do the problem areas move from the right side to the left side?

-Ross
How could it not, you've rotated the camera AND lens. Might as well stand on your head! :)

Andrew
 
Just for fun, take one shot normally, then take the second shot with the camera inverted. Do the problem areas move from the right side to the left side?

-Ross
How could it not, you've rotated the camera AND lens. Might as well stand on your head! :)
turning the camera horizontally on its axis alters the plane of focus, relative to the subject matter... the front glass of the lens(and sensor) is facing a different direction... it introduces another variable.

inverting the camera 180 degrees does not change the plane of focus, relative to the objects being shot.

anyway, please keep us posted on what sony does.
 
Just for fun, take one shot normally, then take the second shot with the camera inverted. Do the problem areas move from the right side to the left side?

-Ross
How could it not, you've rotated the camera AND lens. Might as well stand on your head! :)
turning the camera horizontally on its axis alters the plane of focus, relative to the subject matter... the front glass of the lens(and sensor) is facing a different direction... it introduces another variable.

inverting the camera 180 degrees does not change the plane of focus, relative to the objects being shot.

anyway, please keep us posted on what sony does.
 
Like I've said. On my first test the WHOLE scene is softer on the right. 10m away, 30m away and in the far distance. Have a look at the first image in the link I posted and you'll get an idea (although it was overcast, no double rainbow).

The depth of field completely covers the scene.

Inverting the camera would only help if it was raining or foggy on one side of a building and not the other. And then stopped when I used the 5R. Then started again when I used the A6000. And then started again when I used the 5R again.

The softness is slight, its perfect vs ok. If the 5R and the left side wasn't so damn good you'd be pretty impressed with the right side.

Camera went back, I'd be suprised if its next owner could tell. Certainly a 16-50 wouldn't pick it up.

Andrew
 
One of your test shots with the 55-210 looks out of focus. At the long end I didn't find the 55-210 capable of outresolving the A6000 at f8 and definitely not "wide open".

Your Nex7 is showing corner smearing too.

Andrew
 
One of your test shots with the 55-210 looks out of focus.
Yes, I do seem to get more out-of-focus shots with this camera than with my other cameras.
At the long end I didn't find the 55-210 capable of outresolving the A6000 at f8 and definitely not "wide open".
I must do more tests, but the 55-210 has actually performed better than I expected in these tests. It's a cheap, slim, light lens, and I wasn't expecting much, but so far I'm agreeably surprised.
Your Nex7 is showing corner smearing too.
In which shot? I don't think the NEX-7 is perfect, but it's a lot better than the a6000 in these tests. And I hate the lack of a level gauge in the a6000, so if only taking one camera, I definitely prefer the older model.
 
The level shouldn't have been left out. A fisheye can be quite hard to level depending on scene.

I think the Nex7 shot with the 50/1.8 doesn't look great bottom right but it might an expected amount of corner softness.

Don't forget the PDAF has a micro adjustment, it can be off. I found the autofocus could need a tweek. Very biased to vertical lines too.

Andrew
 
The level shouldn't have been left out. A fisheye can be quite hard to level depending on scene.

I think the Nex7 shot with the 50/1.8 doesn't look great bottom right but it might an expected amount of corner softness.

Don't forget the PDAF has a micro adjustment, it can be off. I found the autofocus could need a tweek. Very biased to vertical lines too.
PDAF wasn't used in these shots, but where is the micro adjustment? I wasn't aware of it. I've now done some more tests, with wide open primes:
 
The level shouldn't have been left out. A fisheye can be quite hard to level depending on scene.

I think the Nex7 shot with the 50/1.8 doesn't look great bottom right but it might an expected amount of corner softness.

Don't forget the PDAF has a micro adjustment, it can be off. I found the autofocus could need a tweek. Very biased to vertical lines too.
PDAF wasn't used in these shots, but where is the micro adjustment? I wasn't aware of it. I've now done some more tests, with wide open primes:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3722455
Micro-adjustment is for Alpha lenses only, with an adapter. Custom menu 5.

-Ross
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top