Would good 10D owner upgrade the firmware?

That's what I'm saying. In mass production you have to readjust
retooling or whatever to so that thing will be in spec. If some
ware in the line the adjustment is wrong then you get a bad batch.
I don't think it's that difficult for you to understand.
We've already been through the "bad batch scenario" and it didn't pan out. I have two of these units and one is an early model 022 series (which most thought were the "bad batch") and the other is a later model 042 series. They both perform identically to MY satisfaction. As for providing images for YOU to judge, just hold your breath until I get back. ;-)
 
That's what I'm saying. In mass production you have to readjust
retooling or whatever to so that thing will be in spec. If some
ware in the line the adjustment is wrong then you get a bad batch.
I don't think it's that difficult for you to understand.
We've already been through the "bad batch scenario" and it didn't
pan out. I have two of these units and one is an early model 022
series (which most thought were the "bad batch") and the other is a
later model 042 series. They both perform identically to MY
satisfaction.
If you assuming there is one assembly line when they're cranking out the unit than you're right. And it doen't explain the abnormal defect show by some. But, there can be more than one and you may the lucky one getting both 10D from good assembly line other people might not.
As for providing images for YOU to judge, just hold
your breath until I get back. ;-)
I'm turning pink ;)

Peace
 
Banned because some winnie here complains. Because they can't make
the argument?
And just because you got sand in your camera and messed it up further trying to clean it out yourself and Canon didn't fix it to your satisfaction, you set out on a crusade. I'd say that was more likely the reason you got banned.
 
Hmm, my crusade? You're only vocal preacher here promising haven if people just stop having doubt in the creator. I'm on the other hand trust no one except my own observation.

My original first posting on this site only state that I'm not happy with AF System and that in your narrow mind you considered that as 10D bashing. And you're will going to the end defending it.

I guess only you're hardware geek here who know what they talking about and every one else are incompetent to evaluate a peace of equipment.

Please try stick to the point and don't change the subject. When did I said my 10D was send for a repair? Do you have ESP ability or you start hearing voices in your head?
Banned because some winnie here complains. Because they can't make
the argument?
And just because you got sand in your camera and messed it up
further trying to clean it out yourself and Canon didn't fix it to
your satisfaction, you set out on a crusade. I'd say that was more
likely the reason you got banned.
 
I'm in the software business and I know when you release a patch
they are for addressing major vissible issues not a minor one with
which most user don't realy care.
Maybe in your company. At mine, we release patches even for minor issues. ;-)

Seriously, many FW updates address no major issues, instead they add minor tweaks or features, eliminate unusual crashers or other flukes, and so on. I used to have a Minolta D7i, and updated its firmware at least three or four times... and I only encountered a problem that could conceivably have been fixed in the firmware one single time (pulling out the CF card with the camera switched on led to a freeze that only a "reset to defaults" cleared).
What do think Canon service department receive most complaint
about? FF and BF issues.
Possible... but the firmware update is extremely unlikely to address it, as it's a calibration issue, not a firmware issue.
May it's the otherway around, you can't conceived that Canon F*k up
since this a perfect world.

I don't take it's as an assult since you show very little in the
ability of critical thinking. I just find that you're annoying.
Ooo, flame flame. [sigh]

Petteri
--
Portfolio: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/index/ ]
Photo lessons: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/lessons/ ]
 
I'm in the software business and I know when you release a patch
they are for addressing major vissible issues not a minor one with
which most user don't realy care.
Maybe in your company. At mine, we release patches even for minor
issues. ;-)

Seriously, many FW updates address no major issues, instead they
add minor tweaks or features, eliminate unusual crashers or other
flukes, and so on. I used to have a Minolta D7i, and updated its
firmware at least three or four times... and I only encountered a
problem that could conceivably have been fixed in the firmware one
single time (pulling out the CF card with the camera switched on
led to a freeze that only a "reset to defaults" cleared).
Don't mean to be defensive. But, if your consider lockup or crashed are minor issue then we're using different scale ;)
What do think Canon service department receive most complaint
about? FF and BF issues.
Possible... but the firmware update is extremely unlikely to
address it, as it's a calibration issue, not a firmware issue.
May it's the otherway around, you can't conceived that Canon F*k up
since this a perfect world.

I don't take it's as an assult since you show very little in the
ability of critical thinking. I just find that you're annoying.
Ooo, flame flame. [sigh]

Petteri
--
Portfolio: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/index/ ]
Photo lessons: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/lessons/ ]
 
Point being, if you'd take the time to READ this forum, (and others) you WOULD see the difference between SLR & DSLR, and be able to adjust your TECHNIQUE accordingly.

I started out here like you (though I didn't complain my camera wasn't working right). The more I shoot REAL THINGS with the camera, the more I understand how IT works (remembering IT doesn't have to understand how I WORK). I tailor what little technique I have, to my growing knowlege of how to get BETTER RESULTS (that's the object here, right?) with the gear I've INVESTED IN (I consider $5000 an investment, wouldn't YOU?)

I can't MAKE you do anything. I SUGGEST you read up a little more on using the 10D system, DISCOVER the differences in hi-res digital photography (versus film), take time to LEARN how to get the best results with new equipment, THEN, if you still have a problem, POST EXAMPLES with exif and descriptions and people can try and help figure out WHERE the problem lies.

85% of the focusing problems show on this forum were NOT the camera NO FOCUSING, but rather shallow DOF and the camera locking somewhere OTHER than where we (meaning you and ME) wanted it to. This seems to be an anomoly of this body over others, but not necessarily a DEFECT, which just MIGHT be addressed by the firmware update that we ALL are waiting to see announced...

LIGHTEN UP DUDE!

Rick

And a better lens could make an average photographer take better pictures.
 
Hmm, my crusade? You're only vocal preacher here promising haven if
people just stop having doubt in the creator. I'm on the other hand
trust no one except my own observation.

My original first posting on this site only state that I'm not
happy with AF System and that in your narrow mind you considered
that as 10D bashing. And you're will going to the end defending it.

I guess only you're hardware geek here who know what they talking
about and every one else are incompetent to evaluate a peace of
equipment.

Please try stick to the point and don't change the subject. When
did I said my 10D was send for a repair? Do you have ESP ability or
you start hearing voices in your head?
You've not changed since you were banned before and there's no use trying to deal with you at all..
 
I'm sure what you're smoking but I think you have mistaking me for someone else since day one.
Hmm, my crusade? You're only vocal preacher here promising haven if
people just stop having doubt in the creator. I'm on the other hand
trust no one except my own observation.

My original first posting on this site only state that I'm not
happy with AF System and that in your narrow mind you considered
that as 10D bashing. And you're will going to the end defending it.

I guess only you're hardware geek here who know what they talking
about and every one else are incompetent to evaluate a peace of
equipment.

Please try stick to the point and don't change the subject. When
did I said my 10D was send for a repair? Do you have ESP ability or
you start hearing voices in your head?
You've not changed since you were banned before and there's no use
trying to deal with you at all..
 
Point being, if you'd take the time to READ this forum, (and
others) you WOULD see the difference between SLR & DSLR, and be
able to adjust your TECHNIQUE accordingly.

I started out here like you (though I didn't complain my camera
wasn't working right). The more I shoot REAL THINGS with the
camera, the more I understand how IT works (remembering IT doesn't
have to understand how I WORK). I tailor what little technique I
have, to my growing knowlege of how to get BETTER RESULTS (that's
the object here, right?) with the gear I've INVESTED IN (I consider
$5000 an investment, wouldn't YOU?)
Thanks for taking time to write your responses. I do appreciate your input.

It's true that there are plenty of things to be learned about photography and I for one still learning the rope.

Like you've I invested in Canon gears even though not as much as you do. When it comes to investment I do have certain expectations. For equipments I expect it to be well build and reliable. My expectation may be high but not overly critical.
I can't MAKE you do anything. I SUGGEST you read up a little more
on using the 10D system, DISCOVER the differences in hi-res digital
photography (versus film), take time to LEARN how to get the best
results with new equipment, THEN, if you still have a problem, POST
EXAMPLES with exif and descriptions and people can try and help
figure out WHERE the problem lies.
Points taken. I learn quite a bit of post processing technique from this board.
85% of the focusing problems show on this forum were NOT the camera
NO FOCUSING, but rather shallow DOF and the camera locking
somewhere OTHER than where we (meaning you and ME) wanted it to.
This seems to be an anomoly of this body over others, but not
necessarily a DEFECT, which just MIGHT be addressed by the firmware
update that we ALL are waiting to see announced...
It's true that some OOF are introduced by new SLR/DSLR user. I'm comming from SLR background and quite familier with Canon camera and very comfortable around one. I too can't wait for the new firmware update to be released and hopefully it will address some major issues reported here.

I for one are very optimistic that firmware reslove some of the issues reported here. If not I can still send it in for repair if needed. I know and trust that Canon will stand behind their products. But unlike other I don't place blind trust in any brand. I like test and compare spec for hardwares that I buy not just camera.

Anyway have niceday
LIGHTEN UP DUDE!

Rick

And a better lens could make an average photographer take better
pictures.
 
I'm in the software business and I know when you release a patch
they are for addressing major vissible issues not a minor one with
which most user don't realy care.
Maybe in your company. At mine, we release patches even for minor
issues. ;-)

Seriously, many FW updates address no major issues, instead they
add minor tweaks or features, eliminate unusual crashers or other
flukes, and so on. I used to have a Minolta D7i, and updated its
firmware at least three or four times... and I only encountered a
problem that could conceivably have been fixed in the firmware one
single time (pulling out the CF card with the camera switched on
led to a freeze that only a "reset to defaults" cleared).
Don't mean to be defensive. But, if your consider lockup or crashed
are minor issue then we're using different scale ;)
On a digital camera, they are minor issues... if they happen infrequently. If they're reproducible or frequent, then they are major ones.

Every digital system will lock up or crash eventually, if you abuse it enough. That's why the Space Shuttle has its avionics computer in triplicate. Mean time between failures may be measured in millions of hours, but it's never infinte. I think one crash per year of intensive use (and in an unusual situation at that) is very good performance.

Petteri
--
Portfolio: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/index/ ]
Photo lessons: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/lessons/ ]
 
Points taken. I learn quite a bit of post processing technique from
this board.
Odd... how did you manage to do that in the 4 days since you've joined this forum? All you've done since joining has been either creating "10D focus issue" threads or participating in existing ones and you've been quite active in doing that. ;-)
 
Who is mini-me characters?
Someone who used to be a regular on this forum. He had some misadventures with his 10D (didn't focus to his satisfaction, then he got sand into it, tried inexpertly to clean it, causing some damage, and had consequent problems getting Canon service to fix it). Problem was, he was extremely prolific about raving and ranting about it, especially generalizing his bad experiences to all Canons, advising people not to buy them and so on. Didn't help his popularity...

Personally, I'm still wondering whether any of his problems were actually real. They could have been: there have been miscalibrated and even downright bad 10D's in circulation. However, his postings led me to suspect that he wasn't a very competent camera user: from where I'm sitting, there was no way to tell whether the problems were in the camera or behind it. Or both, maybe.

Petteri
--
Portfolio: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/index/ ]
Photo lessons: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/lessons/ ]
 
Someone who used to be a regular on this forum. He had some
misadventures with his 10D (didn't focus to his satisfaction, then
he got sand into it, tried inexpertly to clean it, causing some
damage, and had consequent problems getting Canon service to fix
it). Problem was, he was extremely prolific about raving and
ranting about it, especially generalizing his bad experiences to
all Canons, advising people not to buy them and so on. Didn't help
his popularity...
Actually, the camera did perform to his satisfaction in the beginning. It wasn't until he'd gotten sand in the thing, tried to clear it himself, and then sent it into Canon for repair did he begin his ranting with the assistance of a few others.
 
Someone who used to be a regular on this forum. He had some
misadventures with his 10D (didn't focus to his satisfaction, then
he got sand into it, tried inexpertly to clean it, causing some
damage, and had consequent problems getting Canon service to fix
it). Problem was, he was extremely prolific about raving and
ranting about it, especially generalizing his bad experiences to
all Canons, advising people not to buy them and so on. Didn't help
his popularity...
Actually, the camera did perform to his satisfaction in the
beginning. It wasn't until he'd gotten sand in the thing, tried to
clear it himself, and then sent it into Canon for repair did he
begin his ranting with the assistance of a few others.
OK, I stand corrected. I hope he's happy now, wherever he is... [sigh]

Petteri
--
Portfolio: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/index/ ]
Photo lessons: [ http://www.seittipaja.fi/lessons/ ]
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top