-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
Jessica (Monochrome)
- Thread starter mujana
- Start date
Vidau
Forum Pro
I do not like skin made smooth and flat in pp...I rather emphasize skin structure.
jmiller1948
Senior Member
[No message]
Vidau
Forum Pro
I do really like the picture as it is, maybe some unnoticeable technical details, beautiful model, excellent photography.
I do not like skin made smooth and flat in pp...I rather emphasize skin structure.
- Messages
- 30,186
- Solutions
- 112
- Reaction score
- 12,428
I don't comment often. Here I must because the image is well done and makes me want to stop and study it. Fine work on many levels!
I do not like skin made smooth and flat in pp...I rather emphasize skin structure.
--
My opinions are my own and not those of DPR or its administration. They carry no 'special' value (except to me and Lacie of course)
I agree that over processed skin is un-interesting to look at. Here, her chin seems much smoother than the rest of her face. Probably due to the large aperture. The lighting seems too flat, like it could use a little more highlight, especially on her forehead.
I do not like skin made smooth and flat in pp...I rather emphasize skin structure.
David
Thank you for your comment. I keep learning.I agree that over processed skin is un-interesting to look at. Here, her chin seems much smoother than the rest of her face. Probably due to the large aperture. The lighting seems too flat, like it could use a little more highlight, especially on her forehead.
I do not like skin made smooth and flat in pp...I rather emphasize skin structure.
David
London2000
New member
Thank you for sharing this picture. Wonderful shot and beautiful model.
Briansdad1
Senior Member
I disagree. I think the light and the DOF perfectly draw the viewer to the eye. I'm going to have to seriously consider using low key techniques more in the future. This is mage is inspiringI agree that over processed skin is un-interesting to look at. Here, her chin seems much smoother than the rest of her face. Probably due to the large aperture. The lighting seems too flat, like it could use a little more highlight, especially on her forehead.
I do not like skin made smooth and flat in pp...I rather emphasize skin structure.
David
--
I'm not a pro. Images I post, except people pix, are unrestricted - copy, edit, re-post here as part of the tread or elsewhere. Please do not redistribute any of the people pix I post. C&C always welcome and encouraged - I'm not touchy about the negatives.
Briansdad1
Senior Member
One thing I just noticed: is the nose a bit enlarged due to short focal length? I can't tell for sure, not knowing the subject.
Bill
Bill
Thank you Briansdad / David.I disagree. I think the light and the DOF perfectly draw the viewer to the eye. I'm going to have to seriously consider using low key techniques more in the future. This is mage is inspiringI agree that over processed skin is un-interesting to look at. Here, her chin seems much smoother than the rest of her face. Probably due to the large aperture. The lighting seems too flat, like it could use a little more highlight, especially on her forehead.
I do not like skin made smooth and flat in pp...I rather emphasize skin structure.
David
--
I'm not a pro. Images I post, except people pix, are unrestricted - copy, edit, re-post here as part of the tread or elsewhere. Please do not redistribute any of the people pix I post. C&C always welcome and encouraged - I'm not touchy about the negatives.
Last edited:
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum