Just returned the Sigma 30mm, what should I be opting for ?

Indeed I would not think of a 30mm as a Portrait lens and I had it before and while very sharp, bokeh quality was not my favorite. I got the SEL35F18 after that and liked it more.
 
If you are looking for something in approximately the same focal length, I also would recommend the Touit 32, even though the AF hunts (firmware update for PDAF is supposedly coming from Zeiss someday).
 
If you are looking for something in approximately the same focal length, I also would recommend the Touit 32, even though the AF hunts (firmware update for PDAF is supposedly coming from Zeiss someday).
My Touit 1.8/32 used to hunt prior to the latest NEX-6 firmware. After that it hardly hunts with my NEX-6 and definitely does not hunt with my A6000. Going back to the NEX-6 firmware upgrade, after I did this the PDAF function was activated.
 
Ah, Lakeshore-Etobicoke smooth bokeh!

It's quite good bokeh for a lens in that wide range.
 
Ah, Lakeshore-Etobicoke smooth bokeh!

It's quite good bokeh for a lens in that wide range.
thanks, bokeh is excellent given the focal length.
You also use white background areas which add to the blur-ignore effect. Don't know the correct name for that, except maybe white highlights.
 
Ah, Lakeshore-Etobicoke smooth bokeh!

It's quite good bokeh for a lens in that wide range.
thanks, bokeh is excellent given the focal length.
You also use white background areas which add to the blur-ignore effect. Don't know the correct name for that, except maybe white highlights.
That matters less than the distance I am from the subject and hers from the background. With a focal length like this you need to be close to the subject to blur the background more.
Of course, I've just never seen anyone use the white effect so much.
 
While it's true that focal length allows more or less bokeh, the quality of the resulting bokeh (how smooth) can vary between lenses.

Those two lenses (50mm and 18-105) have been praised for having good, smooth bokeh. The 30, not as much. Sometimes lenses can make a difference.
Absolutely and 100% true!
Having said that, the Sigma 30 isn't too bad, still probably better than bokeh from most zooms. At first use, I wasn't too impressed with the Sigma's bokeh, but I've used it for portraits and other things, and the bokeh seems pretty good. I've seen smoother, but really, nothing comes close to the 30 for the price, for what it can do.
The Sigma 30mm is a great lens for a great price, as every lens it has its flaws (a bit more CA, that is easely corrected in post, and not the best bokeh, but when you can pay attention to the background it is not bad either ) but for that price it is a nobrainer...
--
Gary W.
 
Depending on your budget, you might want to look at the Zeiss Touit 1.8/32. It is my standard lens for the A6000. Love the colors, contrast, flare and purple fringing control and the bokeh is beautiful.
Wow, nice images. I have seen a lot of great photos posted from that lens, am starting to wish I had picked up the 2 Touit deal that B&H had recently.

Jose, did you use lighting/reflectors on those models and is there a lot of post processing in those photos? Photographing people is not my thing but I'd like to get better at it. Those shots look great, hard to believe you used the same camera I own!

Mark
You can still get the Touits cheap on Amazon. Less than $500(usd) for the 32 and less than $650 for the 12
I'd go for the 12 first since the e mount lacks a great wide prime otherwise (if you need a wide)
--
'I am ze locksmith of love, no?'
Stephen Reed
 
Depending on your budget, you might want to look at the Zeiss Touit 1.8/32. It is my standard lens for the A6000. Love the colors, contrast, flare and purple fringing control and the bokeh is beautiful.
Wow, nice images. I have seen a lot of great photos posted from that lens, am starting to wish I had picked up the 2 Touit deal that B&H had recently.

Jose, did you use lighting/reflectors on those models and is there a lot of post processing in those photos? Photographing people is not my thing but I'd like to get better at it. Those shots look great, hard to believe you used the same camera I own!

Mark
You can still get the Touits cheap on Amazon. Less than $500(usd) for the 32 and less than $650 for the 12
I'd go for the 12 first since the e mount lacks a great wide prime otherwise (if you need a wide)
--
'I am ze locksmith of love, no?'
Stephen Reed
the 12mm Touit was #1 on my list of desired lenses, but damn it is just too expensive at the moment for me haha. Would like to see how it handles portraits and some video quality examples of it.
 
Depending on your budget, you might want to look at the Zeiss Touit 1.8/32. It is my standard lens for the A6000. Love the colors, contrast, flare and purple fringing control and the bokeh is beautiful.
Wow, nice images. I have seen a lot of great photos posted from that lens, am starting to wish I had picked up the 2 Touit deal that B&H had recently.

Jose, did you use lighting/reflectors on those models and is there a lot of post processing in those photos? Photographing people is not my thing but I'd like to get better at it. Those shots look great, hard to believe you used the same camera I own!

Mark
You can still get the Touits cheap on Amazon. Less than $500(usd) for the 32 and less than $650 for the 12
I'd go for the 12 first since the e mount lacks a great wide prime otherwise (if you need a wide)
--
'I am ze locksmith of love, no?'
Stephen Reed
the 12mm Touit was #1 on my list of desired lenses, but damn it is just too expensive at the moment for me haha. Would like to see how it handles portraits and some video quality examples of it.
The 12 is not a good portrait or video lens. The 32 would work just OK for portraits. But a 50 or higher is much more suitable.
The 12 has a very limited use. BUT! It's limited use can create some of the most interesting photography.
--
'I am ze locksmith of love, no?'
Stephen Reed
 
These are great snaps, but I just pulled the trigger on the Sony 50mm. Budget and all...maybe a Zeiss will appear in my future.

Rolled with the Sigma 30mm with my A6000 and I enjoyed it, but I was hoping for something with better bokeh, something that also has better color vibrancy that isn't a zoom. I also own the 210mm and I enjoy it, but I need a portrait lens that is a bit smaller than that. Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Depending on your budget, you might want to look at the Zeiss Touit 1.8/32. It is my standard lens for the A6000. Love the colors, contrast, flare and purple fringing control and the bokeh is beautiful.

Here are some images from the lens

156431385.Zzi0xPyY.1DSC00742_pp.jpg


156439554.d5aEVZ2L.1DSC00774.jpg


155852530.lrozhS48.1DSC04007_ppa.jpg


155693986.2YW9LXxg.1DSC02075_pp.jpg


155693875.SGs494Oh.1DSC01997_pp.jpg


155998738.GVtgxqFq.1DSC08883_ppc2.jpg


156245319.bgoamXiJ.1DSC00067_pp.jpg


156256606.g9XHsXoS.1DSC00164_ppc.jpg


cheers,

José
 
These are great snaps, but I just pulled the trigger on the Sony 50mm. Budget and all...maybe a Zeiss will appear in my future.
I have both Zeiss Touits. And still my 50mm Sony is my most used lens. The bokeh on the 50 is better than the 32 Zeiss. And the OSS helps a great deal as well.

But I still really like my 32 Zeiss!
 
If you are looking for something in approximately the same focal length, I also would recommend the Touit 32, even though the AF hunts (firmware update for PDAF is supposedly coming from Zeiss someday).
My Touit 1.8/32 used to hunt prior to the latest NEX-6 firmware. After that it hardly hunts with my NEX-6 and definitely does not hunt with my A6000. Going back to the NEX-6 firmware upgrade, after I did this the PDAF function was activated.
Nah, still hunts. Firmware up to date. IQ is great though.
 
The 12 has a very limited use. BUT! It's limited use can create some of the most interesting photography.
--
'I am ze locksmith of love, no?'
Stephen Reed
Not all that limited.



c8a56a74e3c341eb8eb5d7644947b1b0.jpg



1ca6e5c9389b4def9463b6c067fea263.jpg
 
First, when you are sattisfied with it that is good, forget about all you read (even what I tell next) and keep enjoying your lens!

But when you look at the tree in the left of your picture you see all kind of distracting "orbs" with a bright edge. A better bokeh shoud be smooth. look at the tree in this picture (taken with the Sony 50mm f1.8 at F4 (so not the best apperture for bokeh) you will see that the "orbs" have no bright edge and are much more smooth and so less distracting.



 
These are great snaps, but I just pulled the trigger on the Sony 50mm. Budget and all...maybe a Zeiss will appear in my future.
Rolled with the Sigma 30mm with my A6000 and I enjoyed it, but I was hoping for something with better bokeh, something that also has better color vibrancy that isn't a zoom. I also own the 210mm and I enjoy it, but I need a portrait lens that is a bit smaller than that. Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Depending on your budget, you might want to look at the Zeiss Touit 1.8/32. It is my standard lens for the A6000. Love the colors, contrast, flare and purple fringing control and the bokeh is beautiful.

Here are some images from the lens

156431385.Zzi0xPyY.1DSC00742_pp.jpg


156439554.d5aEVZ2L.1DSC00774.jpg


155852530.lrozhS48.1DSC04007_ppa.jpg


155693986.2YW9LXxg.1DSC02075_pp.jpg


155693875.SGs494Oh.1DSC01997_pp.jpg


155998738.GVtgxqFq.1DSC08883_ppc2.jpg


156245319.bgoamXiJ.1DSC00067_pp.jpg


156256606.g9XHsXoS.1DSC00164_ppc.jpg


cheers,

José
congrats with the 50/1.8, it's an excellent lens!

cheers,

José
 
The 12 has a very limited use. BUT! It's limited use can create some of the most interesting photography.
--
'I am ze locksmith of love, no?'
Stephen Reed
Not all that limited.



c8a56a74e3c341eb8eb5d7644947b1b0.jpg



1ca6e5c9389b4def9463b6c067fea263.jpg
Actually, I say 'limited' in the more typical photography sense. But you're right; It's actually broadened my possibilities more than any focal length.
--
'I am ze locksmith of love, no?'
Stephen Reed
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top