1Ds is a joke

Roark

Member
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Location
US
Just sold my Canon 1Ds.

It was a joke.

The AF was the pits. Sure, it was "fast," but far from accurate - especially in AI SERVO mode. I was taking pictures of my gf bowling and she was rarely in focus. The AF was continually jumping in and out of focus, and I kept the AF sensor on her at all times.

The operational is a joke as well. I turn on the camera, and depending on how many pics is on the CF card, it takes about 1-2 seconds to become usable.

If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is completely flushed to even look at them.

The overall usability speed of the camera was no better than the 10D.

The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.

I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in the usability area.

Just for good measure, the 1Ds had outstanding colour and resolution that the Nikon could never touch (at the time of this article.)

I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human error thing.

I feel that the Nikon AF system is better as far as keeping the subject in focus and not losing it all the time and trying to readjust.

I also felt that the high ISO images from the 1Ds were a joke as well. When you zoom in 100% all I would see is blotches of red and green. Even at ISO 400 this was prevelant.

Sorry to bash the 1Ds so much, but for $8000 this camera is a piece of s* .

Compare that to a Nikon D1X which has instant operation speed, from viewing files, to turning on, to deleting and has a better AF system - I don't even know why I bothered buying the 1Ds.

No, this isn't a troll.
 
Just sold my Canon 1Ds.

It was a joke.

The AF was the pits. Sure, it was "fast," but far from accurate -
especially in AI SERVO mode. I was taking pictures of my gf
bowling and she was rarely in focus. The AF was continually
jumping in and out of focus, and I kept the AF sensor on her at all
times.

The operational is a joke as well. I turn on the camera, and
depending on how many pics is on the CF card, it takes about 1-2
seconds to become usable.

If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is
completely flushed to even look at them.

The overall usability speed of the camera was no better than the 10D.

The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.

I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.

Just for good measure, the 1Ds had outstanding colour and
resolution that the Nikon could never touch (at the time of this
article.)

I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.

I feel that the Nikon AF system is better as far as keeping the
subject in focus and not losing it all the time and trying to
readjust.

I also felt that the high ISO images from the 1Ds were a joke as
well. When you zoom in 100% all I would see is blotches of red and
green. Even at ISO 400 this was prevelant.

Sorry to bash the 1Ds so much, but for $8000 this camera is a piece
of s* .

Compare that to a Nikon D1X which has instant operation speed, from
viewing files, to turning on, to deleting and has a better AF
system - I don't even know why I bothered buying the 1Ds.

No, this isn't a troll.
--
Ken W.
http://www.quantumarts.com
http://www.quantumarts.com/photography
http://www.mywhistler.com
 
There is a something called a 'firmware update' . Maybe you should check and see if you are using 1.0.2
Just sold my Canon 1Ds.

It was a joke.

The AF was the pits. Sure, it was "fast," but far from accurate -
especially in AI SERVO mode. I was taking pictures of my gf
bowling and she was rarely in focus. The AF was continually
jumping in and out of focus, and I kept the AF sensor on her at all
times.

The operational is a joke as well. I turn on the camera, and
depending on how many pics is on the CF card, it takes about 1-2
seconds to become usable.

If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is
completely flushed to even look at them.

The overall usability speed of the camera was no better than the 10D.

The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.

I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.

Just for good measure, the 1Ds had outstanding colour and
resolution that the Nikon could never touch (at the time of this
article.)

I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.

I feel that the Nikon AF system is better as far as keeping the
subject in focus and not losing it all the time and trying to
readjust.

I also felt that the high ISO images from the 1Ds were a joke as
well. When you zoom in 100% all I would see is blotches of red and
green. Even at ISO 400 this was prevelant.

Sorry to bash the 1Ds so much, but for $8000 this camera is a piece
of s* .

Compare that to a Nikon D1X which has instant operation speed, from
viewing files, to turning on, to deleting and has a better AF
system - I don't even know why I bothered buying the 1Ds.

No, this isn't a troll.
 
How about the 1D?
Just sold my Canon 1Ds.

It was a joke.

The AF was the pits. Sure, it was "fast," but far from accurate -
especially in AI SERVO mode. I was taking pictures of my gf
bowling and she was rarely in focus. The AF was continually
jumping in and out of focus, and I kept the AF sensor on her at all
times.

The operational is a joke as well. I turn on the camera, and
depending on how many pics is on the CF card, it takes about 1-2
seconds to become usable.

If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is
completely flushed to even look at them.

The overall usability speed of the camera was no better than the 10D.

The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.

I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.

Just for good measure, the 1Ds had outstanding colour and
resolution that the Nikon could never touch (at the time of this
article.)

I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.

I feel that the Nikon AF system is better as far as keeping the
subject in focus and not losing it all the time and trying to
readjust.

I also felt that the high ISO images from the 1Ds were a joke as
well. When you zoom in 100% all I would see is blotches of red and
green. Even at ISO 400 this was prevelant.

Sorry to bash the 1Ds so much, but for $8000 this camera is a piece
of s* .

Compare that to a Nikon D1X which has instant operation speed, from
viewing files, to turning on, to deleting and has a better AF
system - I don't even know why I bothered buying the 1Ds.

No, this isn't a troll.
--
My favorite Cameras -
Nikon F100, Nikon FM3A, Canon EOS 1V, Fuji S2 pro
Amateur Radio call sign VR2XEE
Favorite handhekd ham transceiver - Yaesu VX-5
 
Just sold my Canon 1Ds.

It was a joke.

The AF was the pits. Sure, it was "fast," but far from accurate -
especially in AI SERVO mode. I was taking pictures of my gf
bowling and she was rarely in focus. The AF was continually
jumping in and out of focus, and I kept the AF sensor on her at all
times.

The operational is a joke as well. I turn on the camera, and
depending on how many pics is on the CF card, it takes about 1-2
seconds to become usable.

If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is
completely flushed to even look at them.

The overall usability speed of the camera was no better than the 10D.

The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.

I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.

Just for good measure, the 1Ds had outstanding colour and
resolution that the Nikon could never touch (at the time of this
article.)

I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.

I feel that the Nikon AF system is better as far as keeping the
subject in focus and not losing it all the time and trying to
readjust.

I also felt that the high ISO images from the 1Ds were a joke as
well. When you zoom in 100% all I would see is blotches of red and
green. Even at ISO 400 this was prevelant.

Sorry to bash the 1Ds so much, but for $8000 this camera is a piece
of s* .

Compare that to a Nikon D1X which has instant operation speed, from
viewing files, to turning on, to deleting and has a better AF
system - I don't even know why I bothered buying the 1Ds.

No, this isn't a troll.
--
My favorite Cameras -
Nikon F100, Nikon FM3A, Canon EOS 1V, Fuji S2 pro
Amateur Radio call sign VR2XEE
Favorite handhekd ham transceiver - Yaesu VX-5
 
If you would have read the manual, you would have known that the camera is NOT for bowling pictures.

For that use your Kodak instamatic!

Bowling??!! I can just imagine Bubba walking into the bowling alley with a 1Ds around his neck asking for a fresh pair of 9 shoes and a bud.
Just sold my Canon 1Ds.

It was a joke.

The AF was the pits. Sure, it was "fast," but far from accurate -
especially in AI SERVO mode. I was taking pictures of my gf
bowling and she was rarely in focus. The AF was continually
jumping in and out of focus, and I kept the AF sensor on her at all
times.

The operational is a joke as well. I turn on the camera, and
depending on how many pics is on the CF card, it takes about 1-2
seconds to become usable.

If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is
completely flushed to even look at them.

The overall usability speed of the camera was no better than the 10D.

The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.

I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.

Just for good measure, the 1Ds had outstanding colour and
resolution that the Nikon could never touch (at the time of this
article.)

I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.

I feel that the Nikon AF system is better as far as keeping the
subject in focus and not losing it all the time and trying to
readjust.

I also felt that the high ISO images from the 1Ds were a joke as
well. When you zoom in 100% all I would see is blotches of red and
green. Even at ISO 400 this was prevelant.

Sorry to bash the 1Ds so much, but for $8000 this camera is a piece
of s* .

Compare that to a Nikon D1X which has instant operation speed, from
viewing files, to turning on, to deleting and has a better AF
system - I don't even know why I bothered buying the 1Ds.

No, this isn't a troll.
--
My favorite Cameras -
Nikon F100, Nikon FM3A, Canon EOS 1V, Fuji S2 pro
Amateur Radio call sign VR2XEE
Favorite handhekd ham transceiver - Yaesu VX-5
 
For that use your Kodak instamatic!

Bowling??!! I can just imagine Bubba walking into the bowling
alley with a 1Ds around his neck asking for a fresh pair of 9 shoes
and a bud.
Just sold my Canon 1Ds.

It was a joke.

The AF was the pits. Sure, it was "fast," but far from accurate -
especially in AI SERVO mode. I was taking pictures of my gf
bowling and she was rarely in focus. The AF was continually
jumping in and out of focus, and I kept the AF sensor on her at all
times.

The operational is a joke as well. I turn on the camera, and
depending on how many pics is on the CF card, it takes about 1-2
seconds to become usable.

If I decide to review my pics, I have to wait until the buffer is
completely flushed to even look at them.

The overall usability speed of the camera was no better than the 10D.

The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.

I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.

Just for good measure, the 1Ds had outstanding colour and
resolution that the Nikon could never touch (at the time of this
article.)

I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.

I feel that the Nikon AF system is better as far as keeping the
subject in focus and not losing it all the time and trying to
readjust.

I also felt that the high ISO images from the 1Ds were a joke as
well. When you zoom in 100% all I would see is blotches of red and
green. Even at ISO 400 this was prevelant.

Sorry to bash the 1Ds so much, but for $8000 this camera is a piece
of s* .

Compare that to a Nikon D1X which has instant operation speed, from
viewing files, to turning on, to deleting and has a better AF
system - I don't even know why I bothered buying the 1Ds.

No, this isn't a troll.
--
My favorite Cameras -
Nikon F100, Nikon FM3A, Canon EOS 1V, Fuji S2 pro
Amateur Radio call sign VR2XEE
Favorite handhekd ham transceiver - Yaesu VX-5
 
i don't understand why everytime someone posts something negative about a camera he/she is called a troll... it shouldn't even matter to us what he thinks about the camera... it's his camera, he paid $8,000 bucks for it... i don't care... i also don't care that he don't like the camera... that's his opinion... it's only a camera... a tool... an inanimate object... not a religious relic... although i have to say that to me the person always lose credibility when ever he says "it's not user error" or "i'm an experienced professional"... and Roark, if you're gonna write criticisms, at least sound more knowledgeable... describing things as "a joke" does little for your image... i probably seen "joke" in there 5-7 times...
 
The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.
I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.
Canon uses a positive control system in that to change almost anything you have to press a button AND rotate a dial. This insures that an important setting isn't changed by accident. In other words, it's a feature.
I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.
According to eBay, you sold your 1Ds and 28-135 "kit". So you put a slow consumer-grade, f/3.5-5.6 lens on a 1Ds, and then you complain about indoor AI-Servo tracking.

And that's not a human error thing?

I wonder why Nikon seemed "better"? Could it be due to the fact that all of the Nikon gear you sold off ebay was bright, fast, pro f/2.8 equipment?

Did you ever stop to think that maybe the 1Ds would ALSO benefit from such a lens?

Personally, I'm glad you sold it, as it's likely the recepient will be able to make use of it.
 
There are a few people who get wrongly accused of being a troll, but I don't think this is one of them. He is not looking for a discussion. His post was meant to stir up trouble.
i don't understand why everytime someone posts something negative
about a camera he/she is called a troll... it shouldn't even
matter to us what he thinks about the camera... it's his camera,
he paid $8,000 bucks for it... i don't care... i also don't
care that he don't like the camera... that's his opinion... it's
only a camera... a tool... an inanimate object... not a
religious relic... although i have to say that to me the person
always lose credibility when ever he says "it's not user error" or
"i'm an experienced professional"... and Roark, if you're
gonna write criticisms, at least sound more knowledgeable...
describing things as "a joke" does little for your image... i
probably seen "joke" in there 5-7 times...
--
Jim

'cause life is a lesson – you learn it when you’re through' - LB
 
I used the 50mm 1.4 when I did most of my shooting or I used the 28-70mm 2.8 - NOT the 28-135mm turd.
The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.
I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.
Canon uses a positive control system in that to change almost
anything you have to press a button AND rotate a dial. This insures
that an important setting isn't changed by accident. In other
words, it's a feature.
I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.
According to eBay, you sold your 1Ds and 28-135 "kit". So you put a
slow consumer-grade, f/3.5-5.6 lens on a 1Ds, and then you complain
about indoor AI-Servo tracking.

And that's not a human error thing?

I wonder why Nikon seemed "better"? Could it be due to the fact
that all of the Nikon gear you sold off ebay was bright, fast, pro
f/2.8 equipment?

Did you ever stop to think that maybe the 1Ds would ALSO benefit
from such a lens?

Personally, I'm glad you sold it, as it's likely the recepient will
be able to make use of it.
 
From EBAY:

"I used to own a photography business, now my client base is slowly fading..."

Gee I wonder WHY?
The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.
I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.
Canon uses a positive control system in that to change almost
anything you have to press a button AND rotate a dial. This insures
that an important setting isn't changed by accident. In other
words, it's a feature.
I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.
According to eBay, you sold your 1Ds and 28-135 "kit". So you put a
slow consumer-grade, f/3.5-5.6 lens on a 1Ds, and then you complain
about indoor AI-Servo tracking.

And that's not a human error thing?

I wonder why Nikon seemed "better"? Could it be due to the fact
that all of the Nikon gear you sold off ebay was bright, fast, pro
f/2.8 equipment?

Did you ever stop to think that maybe the 1Ds would ALSO benefit
from such a lens?

Personally, I'm glad you sold it, as it's likely the recepient will
be able to make use of it.
--
Jim

'cause life is a lesson – you learn it when you’re through' - LB
 
I call it as I see it.

As mentioned above, I actually sold off the 1Ds precisely because of the reasons I complained.

I used the best glass available for that camera. I had a 50mm 1.4, 16-35mm 2.8, 28-70mm 2.8 and a 70-200mm 2.8. That camera could not hold a focus, even with the custom settings putting the focus set to "normal" or "slow"

Besides, NO ONE can argue that the camera is slow. Go ahead, turn it on and instantly tap on the shutter button -- NOTHING happens -- it has to read the CF card and "boot up" for about 1-2 seconds.

Go ahead and take a photograph, no wait, go ahead and take about 7 photographs -- now tap the Display button -- what do you see? "Busy" or was it "Wait?" I can't remember. But you had to WAIT until the images were flushed to the CF card before you could even see them.

And NO ONE can argue that Nikon holds its own in this area. Go ahead and turn on that D1 series and tap the shutter - instant photograph. Go ahead and snap off 7 shots - hit the Display button, instant preview, while its still writing to disk.

I'm sorry but the 1Ds was a complete rip off for $8000

I'm glad I got rid of that piece of garbage.

Can you feel my frustration?
i don't understand why everytime someone posts something negative
about a camera he/she is called a troll... it shouldn't even
matter to us what he thinks about the camera... it's his camera,
he paid $8,000 bucks for it... i don't care... i also don't
care that he don't like the camera... that's his opinion... it's
only a camera... a tool... an inanimate object... not a
religious relic... although i have to say that to me the person
always lose credibility when ever he says "it's not user error" or
"i'm an experienced professional"... and Roark, if you're
gonna write criticisms, at least sound more knowledgeable...
describing things as "a joke" does little for your image... i
probably seen "joke" in there 5-7 times...
--
Jim

'cause life is a lesson – you learn it when you’re through' - LB
 
The only person making personal insults seems to be you, Jimmy.

What's wrong?
"I used to own a photography business, now my client base is slowly
fading..."

Gee I wonder WHY?
The three-finger ISO change is a joke as well.
I'm sorry but the Nikon D1 series has the Canon 1D and 1Ds beat in
the usability area.
Canon uses a positive control system in that to change almost
anything you have to press a button AND rotate a dial. This insures
that an important setting isn't changed by accident. In other
words, it's a feature.
I'm very familiar with the Canons and Nikons. This isn't a human
error thing.
According to eBay, you sold your 1Ds and 28-135 "kit". So you put a
slow consumer-grade, f/3.5-5.6 lens on a 1Ds, and then you complain
about indoor AI-Servo tracking.

And that's not a human error thing?

I wonder why Nikon seemed "better"? Could it be due to the fact
that all of the Nikon gear you sold off ebay was bright, fast, pro
f/2.8 equipment?

Did you ever stop to think that maybe the 1Ds would ALSO benefit
from such a lens?

Personally, I'm glad you sold it, as it's likely the recepient will
be able to make use of it.
--
Jim

'cause life is a lesson – you learn it when you’re through' - LB
 
I call it as I see it.

As mentioned above, I actually sold off the 1Ds precisely because of the reasons I complained.

I used the best glass available for that camera. I had a 50mm 1.4, 16-35mm 2.8, 28-70mm 2.8 and a 70-200mm 2.8. That camera could not hold a focus, even with the custom settings putting the focus set to "normal" or "slow"

Besides, NO ONE can argue that the camera is slow. Go ahead, turn it on and instantly tap on the shutter button -- NOTHING happens -- it has to read the CF card and "boot up" for about 1-2 seconds.

Go ahead and take a photograph, no wait, go ahead and take about 7 photographs -- now tap the Display button -- what do you see? "Busy" or was it "Wait?" I can't remember. But you had to WAIT until the images were flushed to the CF card before you could even see them.

And NO ONE can argue that Nikon holds its own in this area. Go ahead and turn on that D1 series and tap the shutter - instant photograph. Go ahead and snap off 7 shots - hit the Display button, instant preview, while its still writing to disk.

I'm sorry but the 1Ds was a complete rip off for $8000

I'm glad I got rid of that piece of garbage.

Can you feel my frustration?
 
I call it as I see it.

As mentioned above, I actually sold off the 1Ds precisely because
of the reasons I complained.

I used the best glass available for that camera. I had a 50mm 1.4,
16-35mm 2.8, 28-70mm 2.8 and a 70-200mm 2.8. That camera could not
hold a focus, even with the custom settings putting the focus set
to "normal" or "slow"

Besides, NO ONE can argue that the camera is slow. Go ahead, turn
it on and instantly tap on the shutter button -- NOTHING happens --
it has to read the CF card and "boot up" for about 1-2 seconds.

Go ahead and take a photograph, no wait, go ahead and take about 7
photographs -- now tap the Display button -- what do you see?
"Busy" or was it "Wait?" I can't remember. But you had to WAIT
until the images were flushed to the CF card before you could even
see them.

And NO ONE can argue that Nikon holds its own in this area. Go
ahead and turn on that D1 series and tap the shutter - instant
photograph. Go ahead and snap off 7 shots - hit the Display button,
instant preview, while its still writing to disk.

I'm sorry but the 1Ds was a complete rip off for $8000

I'm glad I got rid of that piece of garbage.

Can you feel my frustration?
Sure I understand. It doesn't work for everybody. I have two 1D and two 1Ds and since my digital revolution, my business has double.

If you give grandmom a Ferrari for Christmas she'll complain that she has a hard time driving it.

It's all in the image. And I went for the best right now.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top