docmaas
Veteran Member
These two new technologies are embedded in the new Bionz processor. Does this mean the modifications to the captured data take place before/during creation of the raw image?
Mike
Mike
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to Sony’s website, the Exmoor sensor itself does noise reduction to the analog and digital raw data. The Bionz is subsequent to this, at least according to the documentation.These two new technologies are embedded in the new Bionz processor. Does this mean the modifications to the captured data take place before/during creation of the raw image?
According to Sony’s website, the Exmoor sensor itself does noise reduction to the analog and digital raw data. The Bionz is subsequent to this, at least according to the documentation.These two new technologies are embedded in the new Bionz processor. Does this mean the modifications to the captured data take place before/during creation of the raw image?
Those technologies appear to be regular signal processing techniques including sharpening. It might be difficult to bake those into the raw file; perhaps they are just found in the camera JPEG?
--
http://therefractedlight.blogspot.com
We normally think of RAW as minimally processed and uncompressed. My readings of A7(r) reviews is that Sony includes compression and some NR into the RAW's. That would suggest they would not be adverse to further "cooking the RAW's" with such technology.docmaas wrote:
These two new technologies are embedded in the new Bionz processor. Does this mean the modifications to the captured data take place before/during creation of the raw image?
Analog NR in the sensor. Digital compression after ADC.... My readings of A7(r) reviews is that Sony includes compression and some NR into the RAW's.docmaas wrote:
These two new technologies are embedded in the new Bionz processor. Does this mean the modifications to the captured data take place before/during creation of the raw image?
That might be quite difficult. As Mark says above:That would suggest they would not be adverse to further "cooking the RAW's" with such technology.
To be more precise, all CMOS sensors (apart from Foveon) perform so called 'correlated double sampling' (CDS). This removes reset-noise (kTC noise) from the signal without damaging the information of the signal. CDS isn't really noise reduction, certainly not in the way noise reduction is normally though of, but kind of noise removal where one noise componen is eliminated without negative effects.Analog NR in the sensor. Digital compression after ADC.... My readings of A7(r) reviews is that Sony includes compression and some NR into the RAW's.docmaas wrote:
These two new technologies are embedded in the new Bionz processor. Does this mean the modifications to the captured data take place before/during creation of the raw image?
PSP where? Moreover, PSP is hard to measure, and cannot be used directly. However, storing tangential/saggital MTF curve at 4–6 different distances from the center would be nice — but publishing it instead would be as good as this…The diffraction reduction is likely deconvolution of the signal. It will increase image noise levels somewhat and requires a good point spread function (PSF) so it'll likely work only with Sony (and Zeiss) lenses. Ideally the camera should add the PSF as metadata into the raw file.