compact flash card reader for macbook pro

momo246197

Leading Member
Messages
859
Reaction score
13
Location
Montpellier, FR
can you suggest a compact flash reader for me please...it'll be used with a new macbook pro...usb3 compatible? thunderbolt?

I've been using a firewire 400 lexar for a long time...it's ok fast...how's usb3 for speed?

thanks for your thoughts...

M
 
USB3 faster than FW400 I think.
No contest. USB 3 is much faster than FW400.

While FireWire 400 was great because it was faster than both USB 1 and USB 2, USB 3 is so much faster than any common version of FireWire that it's worth chucking FireWire out the window, which is why Apple did that when USB 3 came out. The only consumer protocol faster than USB 3 is Thunderbolt, but nobody is going to make a Thunderbolt card reader.

(My old Compact Flash card reader was FireWire 800; USB 3 is much faster than that too.)
Because it's expensive. $49.99

I have two USB 3 readers, one for home and one for the travel bag. Both have Compact Flash slots and both have been reliable so far.

Transcend RDF8 - $14.95

Monoprice item 9977 - $12.16

The Lexar might perform better, I don't know. And if you load cards every single day, maybe the Lexar will hold up longer. But from a price perspective, I'd have to see the death of 3 Transcend or 4 Monoprice card readers before I'll start to feel like I should have bought the Lexar...

Back when FireWire was the fastest protocol, Mac users (like me and you) bought Lexar because they were one of the few companies that made FireWire Compact Flash readers. But USB 3 chipsets are such a cheap commodity that they have made cheap fast card readers possible and Lexar no longer has the stranglehold it once did.
 
Last edited:
Hi There,

These are are fast, also depends on how fast the card is,

Both CF and SD USB3

..........Gary



93a01caa51924d2885ffd3c29f9ce696.jpg
 
USB3 faster than FW400 I think.
No contest. USB 3 is much faster than FW400.

While FireWire 400 was great because it was faster than both USB 1 and USB 2, USB 3 is so much faster than any common version of FireWire that it's worth chucking FireWire out the window, which is why Apple did that when USB 3 came out. The only consumer protocol faster than USB 3 is Thunderbolt, but nobody is going to make a Thunderbolt card reader.

(My old Compact Flash card reader was FireWire 800; USB 3 is much faster than that too.)
Because it's expensive. $49.99

I have two USB 3 readers, one for home and one for the travel bag. Both have Compact Flash slots and both have been reliable so far.

Transcend RDF8 - $14.95

Monoprice item 9977 - $12.16

The Lexar might perform better, I don't know.
I don't care as much about expense as size, the readers you listed seemed like they would perform well but they sure look a lot more massive than the Lexar reader.

I have a compact cheap USB 3.0 SD only reader, but I would like to see a really compact USB 3.0 CF only reader...
 
The only consumer protocol faster than USB 3 is Thunderbolt, but nobody is going to make a Thunderbolt card reader.
Lexar does.
Cool. It almost makes me wish I had a use for one :-D
There are Macs that have Thunderbolt ports, but not built-in USB 3.0 ones. Maybe their users would be potential customers for Thunderbolt-based card readers.
Wow. I stand corrected! Although I can also be pedantic and say technically my post's still correct because it isn't out yet (the web page says "Coming Soon"). And when it does, who knows how much it will cost. Chances are it will, like FireWire, cost many times as much as the $12.16 USB 3 reader at Monoprice.

Yes, one argument for buying what will probably be an overpriced TB card reader would be that your Mac's out of USB ports. Or maybe you have a Mac like mine that has Thunderbolt but is too old to have USB 3, in which case a TB reader would be much faster than the poky USB 2 ports.

But as for speed, are there any CF cards that are faster than USB 3 in real world throughput so that they could benefit from TB at all? My guess is that as long as you have a USB port free, there might not be any performance advantage to a TB reader vs a USB 3 reader if speed is ultimately limited by the card.
 
Last edited:
The only consumer protocol faster than USB 3 is Thunderbolt, but nobody is going to make a Thunderbolt card reader.
Lexar does.
Cool. It almost makes me wish I had a use for one :-D
There are Macs that have Thunderbolt ports, but not built-in USB 3.0 ones. Maybe their users would be potential customers for Thunderbolt-based card readers.
Wow. I stand corrected! Although I can also be pedantic and say technically my post's still correct because it isn't out yet (the web page says "Coming Soon"). And when it does, who knows how much it will cost. Chances are it will, like FireWire, cost many times as much as the $12.16 USB 3 reader at Monoprice.
FYI, the USB 3 version is supposed to cost $100 and the TB version $200 (it's a four-bay card reader). And one can argue that a dual-port TB device includes something akin to a two-port (TB) hub.
But as for speed, are there any CF cards that are faster than USB 3 in real world throughput so that they could benefit from TB at all? My guess is that as long as you have a USB port free, there might not be any performance advantage to a TB reader vs a USB 3 reader if speed is ultimately limited by the card.
The fastest cards today offer about 170 MB/s or 1.35 GBit/s. USB 3 offers 5 GBit/s, TB 1 offers 10 GBit/s, TB 2 20 GBit/s. So a four-bay reader might just about saturate USB 3 but you'd need four of the fastest cards and a PCI SSD or a RAID on the receiving end to notice any difference. I'd mainly get TB to reduce the number of cables.
 
I have two USB 3 readers, one for home and one for the travel bag. Both have Compact Flash slots and both have been reliable so far.

Transcend RDF8 - $14.95

Monoprice item 9977 - $12.16
I've also got the Transcend and it's fine. I haven't clocked it, but my MBP has USB3 ports and the Transcend unit is visibly faster than my Lexar FW400 reader. Bonus: it reads most kinds of removable media, so it's very nice to have for a number of reasons.
 
The fastest cards today offer about 170 MB/s or 1.35 GBit/s. USB 3 offers 5 GBit/s, TB 1 offers 10 GBit/s, TB 2 20 GBit/s. So a four-bay reader might just about saturate USB 3 but you'd need four of the fastest cards and a PCI SSD or a RAID on the receiving end to notice any difference. I'd mainly get TB to reduce the number of cables.
That's what I thought. Still, a lot of high volume photographers could see value in a four-bay reader when used with software that can ingest efficiently (in parallel) from it, even if the bus isn't fully saturated. The four bays might just make it worth their time to pay 16x the price of the Monoprice reader.
 
I have a pair of these and like them. Multi-format. USB 3.0. Cable included. $15.

 
The only consumer protocol faster than USB 3 is Thunderbolt, but nobody is going to make a Thunderbolt card reader.
Lexar does.
Cool. It almost makes me wish I had a use for one :-D
There are Macs that have Thunderbolt ports, but not built-in USB 3.0 ones. Maybe their users would be potential customers for Thunderbolt-based card readers.
Why do you say..... 'no built-in USB3 ports' ???
My MacBook Pro Retina 2013 has TW) USB3 ports AND a Thunderbolt port !! .... all of them for sometime earlier even, had the same.
 
The only consumer protocol faster than USB 3 is Thunderbolt, but nobody is going to make a Thunderbolt card reader.
Lexar does.
Cool. It almost makes me wish I had a use for one :-D
There are Macs that have Thunderbolt ports, but not built-in USB 3.0 ones. Maybe their users would be potential customers for Thunderbolt-based card readers.
Why do you say..... 'no built-in USB3 ports' ???
My MacBook Pro Retina 2013 has TW) USB3 ports AND a Thunderbolt port !! .... all of them for sometime earlier even, had the same.
Before making such bold statements better check your facts firsts (if your memory cannot be relied upon). TB was introduced by Apple in 2011, USB 3 was added in 2012 (to laptops, minis, and iMacs). And if you want to count the TB display, it was introduced in 2011 as well but kept its USB 2 ports throughout 2012 and 2013.

That 'sometime earlier even' of yours was just one single model year (2012).
 
The only consumer protocol faster than USB 3 is Thunderbolt, but nobody is going to make a Thunderbolt card reader.
Lexar does.
Cool. It almost makes me wish I had a use for one :-D
There are Macs that have Thunderbolt ports, but not built-in USB 3.0 ones. Maybe their users would be potential customers for Thunderbolt-based card readers.
Why do you say..... 'no built-in USB3 ports' ???
My MacBook Pro Retina 2013 has TW) USB3 ports AND a Thunderbolt port !! .... all of them for sometime earlier even, had the same.
Before making such bold statements better check your facts firsts (if your memory cannot be relied upon). TB was introduced by Apple in 2011, USB 3 was added in 2012 (to laptops, minis, and iMacs). And if you want to count the TB display, it was introduced in 2011 as well but kept its USB 2 ports throughout 2012 and 2013.

That 'sometime earlier even' of yours was just one single model year (2012).
The MacBook that I have, was bought in October 2013...if I've got my thoughts right on THIS one...the model was first introduced in I'm sure February 2013. That's "some time earlier" enough to be what I had in mind... and YOUR statement was made in July 2014.. reading just as though it referred to such as models almost 18 months ago or more.
Be careful in making your statement which cannot help but be regarded as being in relation to models which are almost in the 'relics' stage now.. certainly back to 2012 which really is a long time ago... and for which I'm quite sure most owners have no thought whatsoever of using USB3 for anything.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top