Sigma 15-30 rocks!

chrisam

Member
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Location
Yorkshire, UK
Just a thank-you to everyone who recommended the Sigma 15-30...
Managed to get one from Jessops for £399 using their price match.

Nice and wide even on the 10D, lovely sharpness and contrast, shame its such a big beast!

Just found out its also pretty good at showing sensor dust at 15mm and tiny apertures...

-- http://www.pbase.com/chris_uk
 
Have fun!

Dan.
Just a thank-you to everyone who recommended the Sigma 15-30...
Managed to get one from Jessops for £399 using their price match.
Nice and wide even on the 10D, lovely sharpness and contrast, shame
its such a big beast!
Just found out its also pretty good at showing sensor dust at 15mm
and tiny apertures...

-- http://www.pbase.com/chris_uk
--
'Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so' HHGTTG
http://www.pbase.com/dasantillo
 
Thanks Kit - does the aperture make any difference then?
Yes it does. Dust will be there all the time but stopping down to say.... f16 or f22 make them more visible. I usually shoot in f8 or f11 so they don't really shot unless its very bad.
 
The aperture was at least f16 (maybe smaller). If I can avoid having to clean I will - the marks were easily clone-brushed out anyhow.
Glad to hear the 15mm aspect makes no difference - I love that end of the zoom!
I've only seen dust on my 10D images at apertures smaller than
f/16, and have therefore chosen to ignore the problem, at least for
the time being! :-)

--
Thanks,
Mark Goldstein
http://www.markgoldstein.co.uk
http://www.photographyblog.com
--
http://www.pbase.com/chris_uk
 
I had a hard time choosing between the Sigma and the 16-35 L

I ended up with the canon (Just) The slightly better contrast plus the easy use of filters did it.

Although i was TOTALY impressed with the Sigma, especialy when you consider the very dmall price tag : )
Just a thank-you to everyone who recommended the Sigma 15-30...
Managed to get one from Jessops for £399 using their price match.
Nice and wide even on the 10D, lovely sharpness and contrast, shame
its such a big beast!
Just found out its also pretty good at showing sensor dust at 15mm
and tiny apertures...

-- http://www.pbase.com/chris_uk
--
If only thire wos money to mayke owt of typo's
 
I haven't even handled a 16-35 (or any L come to that) - Jessops were supposed to get 16-35 and 15-30 for me to compare both - but they only got the Sigma. The price for the Canon and Adam-T's comments about his put me off.

The clincher was when they matched the cheapest Sigma web price I could find - seemed rude to refuse after that !
I'm worried if I ever do get close to an L lens, my life will change for ever.
I ended up with the canon (Just) The slightly better contrast plus
the easy use of filters did it.

Although i was TOTALY impressed with the Sigma, especialy when you
consider the very dmall price tag : )
Just a thank-you to everyone who recommended the Sigma 15-30...
Managed to get one from Jessops for £399 using their price match.
Nice and wide even on the 10D, lovely sharpness and contrast, shame
its such a big beast!
Just found out its also pretty good at showing sensor dust at 15mm
and tiny apertures...

-- http://www.pbase.com/chris_uk
--
If only thire wos money to mayke owt of typo's
--
http://www.pbase.com/chris_uk
 
I'm going to tell you something that can make you happier.

Before I got my 15-30, I had the chance to compare it with the shop's demo 16-35 and my own 20mm. My budget was for the 16-35 though. To my surprise, the 15-30 outperforms the 16-35 is all aspects. Wide open, stopped down, lone end, wide end whatever. The 16-35 was (for the lack of a better description), an expensive mess. I returned the following day to get the 15-30 and had a chat with the lady. Without me showing her the sample images, she wasn't surprised that I went for the 15-30. Apparently, she had more bad reviews from customers with the 16-35 compared to the 15-30 I was told by her.

I'm in no way knocking the 16-35, but judging from the tests, how can i refuse a better lens that costs half the price? The demo 16-35 might be a lemon though.
 
Just a thank-you to everyone who recommended the Sigma 15-30...
Managed to get one from Jessops for £399 using their price match.
Nice and wide even on the 10D, lovely sharpness and contrast, shame
its such a big beast!
Just found out its also pretty good at showing sensor dust at 15mm
and tiny apertures...
You bet it rcks !



 
Great images there Maurice
Hope to post some of mine when I get a chance
Just a thank-you to everyone who recommended the Sigma 15-30...
Managed to get one from Jessops for £399 using their price match.
Nice and wide even on the 10D, lovely sharpness and contrast, shame
its such a big beast!
Just found out its also pretty good at showing sensor dust at 15mm
and tiny apertures...
You bet it rcks !



--
http://www.pbase.com/chris_uk
 
I had a hard time choosing between the Sigma and the 16-35 L
I started out with the 15-30 but slowly became dissatisfied when comparing the images to the image made with a Canon 28-70mm f/2.8L. No surprise there.

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1177985

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1337415&size=lg
I ended up with the canon (Just) The slightly better contrast plus
the easy use of filters did it.
But when it came to scenics, the 15-30 just couldn't pull the boat and so I broke down and picked up a 16-35 because I was wanted more.

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1547842&size=lg

None of the WA's that I have, hold a candle to the amount of detail that I'm pulling from my scenics since getting the 16-35 and this using a D30:-) Contrast and color are nothing short of fabuoulous.

Is my comment intended to knock the 15-30? Not a chance, the 15-30, which I still have and won't part with, rocks as the original posters commented but there is better if that's what you're looking for.
Although i was TOTALY impressed with the Sigma, especialy when you
consider the very dmall price tag : )
Price wise, the 15-30 blows the 16-35 away and definitely comes under the heading of "Best Buy" for a WA zoom. Even if you pick up a Canon 20mm f/2.8 to complement this beast with, you're still a few hundred bucks under the price of a 16-35. Now I have all three:-)

The point of my above, I have both and highly recommend the 15-30 zoom as an excellent buy for the price.

--
If you don't want to believe me, ignore me:-)
 
Was torn (and I mean TORN) between the 15-30 & the 16-35L. Spent a month trying to decide, then went for the L, when I couldn't find anyone that could give me an "I tried both" comparison.

I'm using the lens for low-light concert photography, so my f's are 4 and below.

Tried it out last night for the first time. I'm pretty impressed. Now I gotta find someone local that has a 15-30 to rent, so I can compare them back-to-back. I don't "regret" buying the L, but if I could have gotten off $900 US cheeper, with "close" results, I probably would have gotten the Sigma, and a macro.

No biggie.

Rick
I'm going to tell you something that can make you happier.

Before I got my 15-30, I had the chance to compare it with the
shop's demo 16-35 and my own 20mm. My budget was for the 16-35
though. To my surprise, the 15-30 outperforms the 16-35 is all
aspects. Wide open, stopped down, lone end, wide end whatever. The
16-35 was (for the lack of a better description), an expensive
mess. I returned the following day to get the 15-30 and had a chat
with the lady. Without me showing her the sample images, she wasn't
surprised that I went for the 15-30. Apparently, she had more bad
reviews from customers with the 16-35 compared to the 15-30 I was
told by her.

I'm in no way knocking the 16-35, but judging from the tests, how
can i refuse a better lens that costs half the price? The demo
16-35 might be a lemon though.
 
I'm worried if I ever do get close to an L lens, my life will
change for ever.
Then I'll give you a clue of which door "NOT" to open:-)

Never! And I repeat, never open a door marked "Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L inside". If you ever open this door, all will be lost and you'll be contaminated forever and your wallet will be drained to a point of disbelief. You'll lose you mind and all contact with reality. You'll go weak as you dream and pine for the next lens. It's a communicable sickness and disease that's easily past'd on to the next unsupecting innocent soul via the internet.

If someone at a camera store, even so much as try's to show you a side-by-side comparative results this lens is capable of, blind your eyes and walk away immediately and don't turn back. If you do the salt you'll taste will be that of your very own tears as you look at your next credit card receipt. You'll have no strength to prevent this from happening. No photographer has the ability to resist after being exposed in this manner:-) Laws need to be passed I tell ya! :-)

The 24-70mm f/2.8L is a gateway lens and you'll not be able to return to the light, airy and satisfying world of cheap glass, repleate with image distortions and slow focus speeds once your eyes have tasted the sweet smooth image quality a good copy of a 24-70mm f/2.8 is easily capable of:-)

Before you know it, all the lenses that you were so happy with start getting the sideways look. Ya know, I should probably replace this lens and I know just the "L" lens that I can replace it with. It takes you over as you lose control. You no longer see the price tag of a 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, all you can think of is how can I get one. You start to lie to the family; "We can get another six years out of this fifteen year old car." And you find new ways to rationalize reusing fashions from years past; "Honey, just tell them it's the retro look." You'll know that you're hooked when a good looking gal walks by and you think, "Dang, I bet she'd look good if captured with my "L" lens and not "What a hot momma!"

So please, listen to the wisdom of my warning. Please! Ruination is all that you'll find if you should ever be so nieve as to open the door marked "Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L inside". Please..... don't do it!

You've been warned!!!!! Echo, echo..., echooooo....., ec........:-)

--
If you don't want to believe me, ignore me:-)
 
Never! And I repeat, never open a door marked "Canon 24-70mm
f/2.8L inside". If you ever open this door, all will be lost and
you'll be contaminated forever and your wallet will be drained to a
point of disbelief. You'll lose you mind and all contact with
reality. You'll go weak as you dream and pine for the next lens.
It's a communicable sickness and disease that's easily past'd on to
the next unsupecting innocent soul via the internet.
I bought one a week or so ago.. just starting to use it.. ouch $1149.00 in Dallas but the pictures are very good.. and the lens comes with that nifty looking red circle around the barrel.... isn't red the international warning color?.... guess it's there for a reason. ... so anyway.. next lens will be the 70-200 2.8 IS... we didn't need that Carribean Vacations this year anyway.. too much work.

Jim
http://www.image36.com
The ability to 'see' is more important than the gear.
 
Never! And I repeat, never open a door marked "Canon 24-70mm
f/2.8L inside". If you ever open this door, all will be lost and
you'll be contaminated forever and your wallet will be drained to a
point of disbelief. You'll lose you mind and all contact with
reality. You'll go weak as you dream and pine for the next lens.
It's a communicable sickness and disease that's easily past'd on to
the next unsupecting innocent soul via the internet.
I bought one a week or so ago.. just starting to use it.. ouch
$1149.00 in Dallas but the pictures are very good.. and the lens
comes with that nifty looking red circle around the barrel....
isn't red the international warning color?.... guess it's there for
a reason. ... so anyway.. next lens will be the 70-200 2.8 IS... we
didn't need that Carribean Vacations this year anyway.. too much
work.
I lucked out. My wife knew that I had lost my mind, so she didn't pay me too much attention:-) Besides, you're probably only going to get sunburned while in the Carribean and we all know that sunburns can increase you chances of getting skin cancer. I bet they've not been able to pin cancer of an "L" lens:-) So by buying a "L" lens and not going on the vacation, you're looking out for your health:-) Yeah! That works:-)

--
If you don't want to believe me, ignore me:-)
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top