A6000 or RX3

Currently travelling for 12 months and have been using an RX 2. Is there a reason to go for the a6000 if I have no interest in changing lenses?

Podgy Dad said:

Currently travelling for 12 months and have been using an RX 2. Is there a reason to go for the a6000 if I have no interest in changing lenses?

Click to expand...

Are you a time traveler?

There is no RX2 in this space-time reality yet.

Apologies, of course I meant the RX100 M3

Podgy Dad said:

Currently travelling for 12 months and have been using an RX 2. Is there a reason to go for the a6000 if I have no interest in changing lenses?

Click to expand...

I purchased the RX100 M3 the other day and did some testing. Really liked the compact aspect of the camera but couldn't get use to the popup viewfinder. Very small and it bothered my eyes trying to use it.

Last night, I returned it to the Sony store and picked up the A6000. Viewfinder is much better and I have the 16-50 kit lens which is slower than the lens on the M3. The reach on the M3 is longer so it's a matter of personal preference.

Podgy Dad said:

Currently travelling for 12 months and have been using an RX 2. Is there a reason to go for the a6000 if I have no interest in changing lenses?

Click to expand...

M 3 is a pocket P&S and A6000 with 16-70 is a CAMERA!

Al.

Podgy Dad said:

Currently travelling for 12 months and have been using an RX 2. Is there a reason to go for the a6000 if I have no interest in changing lenses?

Click to expand...

Not if:

a) you have no interest in changing lenses

b) you rarely shoot in low light

c) you don't need fast AF

--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mars_observer/