Given that -
- I don't need a weather sealed camera to take pictures in the rain.
- I am not really fussed about image stabilisation ( 3 axis vs 5 axis)
- I don't think that the VF4 is very good. Its better than the VF2 but neither are that great. So not the difference in EVFs unless the E-M1 EVF is a lot better than the VF4.
- PDAF gives E-M1 an edge over the E-M10 for C-AF but not a patch on a D7100.
- Build quality of the E-M10 is good enough.
Those things apart, what can the E-M1 do that the E-M10 cannot. As a separate question what can the E-M1 do better than the E-M10.
That all sounds pretty negative but i am genuinely interested in what the E-M1 offers over the E-M10. I can see some advantages that they both have over my E-PL5s but apart from the items that I bulleted I don't see what else the E-M1 has over the E-M10.
Regards
John
I think some people will like one and others will like the other.
I got the E-M1 in November and, in my opinion, it is the best camera I've ever owned (including the Nikon D90 and D7000). However, it is roughly as big as the smallest DSLRs (Canon Rebel SL1), and because of the grip, it handles like a DSLR. I missed my old E-M5. I prefer small and light cameras that handle more like film SLRs or rangefinders (like the old Canonet QL-17).
The E-M1's EVF is nicer, but not tremendously so. It has lots of programmable buttons. I especially like the lever on the E-M1 that switches the function of the dials (but I can program a button on the E-M10 to do the same). The 1/8000 max shutter speed could come in handy at noon on a bright day. Focusing is slightly faster in low light too. I never use C-AF or legacy 4/3 lenses, so that doesn't matter to me.