Well Fuji are apparently going to be bringing out an X-T1b or similar very soon, so the only way the price of the X-T1 is going to go is down. Therefore I'd suggest waiting a while and seeing what happens. You're not going to lose any money waiting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The main reason to buy the XT-1 is none of these, but the said increased AF speed in locking on to a subject.The choice is easy if you need the tilt screen, weather sealing and want the bigger VF.
Can you tell us which foto is which ? For me the second one looks a little "crispier"When I moved to the Fuji system around 18 or so months ago I had a D300s, a D800 and a Canon 5DMKII and was thinking of getting an E1 as a small travel camera. For travels I had previously used the D300s plus the 16-85 zoom.I am also considering an XE2 or XT1.
I currently shoot a D90 with 18-200, and picked up an X20 last fall, for a compact carry around. If I had my time back, I should have switch then to an XE2 with kit 18-55. Comparing what I have today with the XE2, will I really see a huge improvement in IQ compared to the D90 or X20?
The new toy side of me is sawing go for the XE2, the practical side, and thinking of my skills side, is sawing save the money and just shoot more. Maybe wait a year, then upgrade. Thoughts?
I found immediately that the E1 photos were crisper, had more 3-D feel to it and I could tell the photos were a notch up from the D300s. So I took the E1 into the studio and compared the files from the D800 (not the E version though...) and found the files from the E1 were similar to the D800 files in terms of sharpness and detail, obviously the D800 has way more pixels for sure but the Fuji files were just very, very good, you might have seen the 100% comparison files I posted here some time ago? In short, the D90 although not a bad camera as such but not on the same level as the Fujis as far as image quality goes. Here are the 2 100% crops from the same photo shoot, one from the D800 the other from the X-E1. I dodn't have the Nikons anymore so these are from April last year, processed in Capture One 7 Pro.
What they don't tell you about those Fuji cameras is how much fun it is to shoot them! Walked around Melbourne with an X-E2 and the fabulous 23/1.4 and thought that this was by far the best system I have ever used - and there sure was some competition!
Good luck
Deed
I actually didn't even think of that ergonomics-wiseFor me it is the X-E2. It has the better looks and the better ergonomics, because the distance from the viewfinder to the right hand and thumb is too small on the X-T1 for a left eye shooter like me. For right eye shooter the X-E2 is even better, because the nose is totally out of the game. I hope Fuji did not discontinue the RF form factor and bring a X-E3 some time in the future. If not I would be very disappointed...
First one is the D800, the second one the X-E1 ...Can you tell us which foto is which ? For me the second one looks a little "crispier"When I moved to the Fuji system around 18 or so months ago I had a D300s, a D800 and a Canon 5DMKII and was thinking of getting an E1 as a small travel camera. For travels I had previously used the D300s plus the 16-85 zoom.I am also considering an XE2 or XT1.
I currently shoot a D90 with 18-200, and picked up an X20 last fall, for a compact carry around. If I had my time back, I should have switch then to an XE2 with kit 18-55. Comparing what I have today with the XE2, will I really see a huge improvement in IQ compared to the D90 or X20?
The new toy side of me is sawing go for the XE2, the practical side, and thinking of my skills side, is sawing save the money and just shoot more. Maybe wait a year, then upgrade. Thoughts?
I found immediately that the E1 photos were crisper, had more 3-D feel to it and I could tell the photos were a notch up from the D300s. So I took the E1 into the studio and compared the files from the D800 (not the E version though...) and found the files from the E1 were similar to the D800 files in terms of sharpness and detail, obviously the D800 has way more pixels for sure but the Fuji files were just very, very good, you might have seen the 100% comparison files I posted here some time ago? In short, the D90 although not a bad camera as such but not on the same level as the Fujis as far as image quality goes. Here are the 2 100% crops from the same photo shoot, one from the D800 the other from the X-E1. I dodn't have the Nikons anymore so these are from April last year, processed in Capture One 7 Pro.
What they don't tell you about those Fuji cameras is how much fun it is to shoot them! Walked around Melbourne with an X-E2 and the fabulous 23/1.4 and thought that this was by far the best system I have ever used - and there sure was some competition!
Good luck
Deed
Thanks.. I just know what I like in a photo and so that's what I shoot. I used to try to follow the suggestions of others but found I was not personally happy with the results.. so, I shoot for me... and I feel better now.Hi Jim
I checked out your site. There is no doubt you know how to use a camera. Very clean images with good colour and strong tonality. I like your compositional style. I seem unwitting addicted to a triangular/swoosh composition and the rule of thirds. You keep things fresh.
This is one of mine it took me a while to realise I really liked. While your 'look' is undoubtedly modern, I always end up producing images in the 'fin de siecle' style.
Could be worse I suppose. :-D
Technically, then second one seems better, sharper, but I prefer the first one for that kind of portrait, with a warmer tone and softer skin.First one is the D800, the second one the X-E1 ...
Surprised?? Well lets just say I was!
Deed
It is indeed divine!The XE2 has a simplicity about it which is the hallmark of god design.