Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where and when will you take a compact camera? Will the attached lens serve your needs? If you want an equivalent lens or set of lenses, will you take that backpack with you or simply leave a small prime or small zoom on the camera and miss shots?Can anyone who has owned both comment on the differences?
I'm leaning towards the g1x mII. I loved my G9 until it died. I'm not sure I'm ready to spend so much in extra lenses or want the hassle of packing them.
I will take the camera on day outings, weekend trips, traveling etc.Where and when will you take a compact camera? Will the attached lens serve your needs? If you want an equivalent lens or set of lenses, will you take that backpack with you or simply leave a small prime or small zoom on the camera and miss shots?Can anyone who has owned both comment on the differences?
I'm leaning towards the g1x mII. I loved my G9 until it died. I'm not sure I'm ready to spend so much in extra lenses or want the hassle of packing them.
The G1 X II is a cross between a G camera and a DSLR/ILC. It's kind of like an M with a fixed lens, except for the difference in movie mode and other details noted here and elsewhere. The sensor is a bit smaller, but considering the sensor matches my 7D for detail reproduction, color, dynamic range, noise behavior, etc. I'd say the big difference here is just the difference in pixel count.
So, will you take the G1 X II with you more often, take more pictures, enjoy it more? If you're a G9 shooter and you want something with an amazing lens all in one package and small, then you'll probably get more use from the G1 X II.
I grab mine every time I leave the house and always take it on trips. Great backup for my 7D or walkaround, casual camera.I will take the camera on day outings, weekend trips, traveling etc.Where and when will you take a compact camera? Will the attached lens serve your needs? If you want an equivalent lens or set of lenses, will you take that backpack with you or simply leave a small prime or small zoom on the camera and miss shots?Can anyone who has owned both comment on the differences?
I'm leaning towards the g1x mII. I loved my G9 until it died. I'm not sure I'm ready to spend so much in extra lenses or want the hassle of packing them.
The G1 X II is a cross between a G camera and a DSLR/ILC. It's kind of like an M with a fixed lens, except for the difference in movie mode and other details noted here and elsewhere. The sensor is a bit smaller, but considering the sensor matches my 7D for detail reproduction, color, dynamic range, noise behavior, etc. I'd say the big difference here is just the difference in pixel count.
So, will you take the G1 X II with you more often, take more pictures, enjoy it more? If you're a G9 shooter and you want something with an amazing lens all in one package and small, then you'll probably get more use from the G1 X II.
I moved to a wrist strap on my G1 X, but different strokes and all.I believe that the attached lenses will definitely serve my needs. I'm a simple photographer who wants simplicity over complexity and small/portable over extra lenses.
Yes, the G1x mii is small enough for me. I will carry it with a neck strap.
Define what you mean by "better image quality."I do feel though, that $800 is a lot, and so therefore, am curious if the money wouldn't be better spent on a camera with better image quality.
Hmmmmm....no idea.I am also assuming that the EOS M mII solved a lot of short comings of the mI. slow focus etc.
They are different beasts. Image quality about the same. Lens selection using the adapter is nice if you don't mind the size. Otherwise, the Mark II lens is pretty amazing.I am pretty sold on the all-in-one simplicity and quality of the g1x mii, but am looking for alternate opinions and options for the same money.
thanks for the help!
Thanks for this legit response!I have a G1x and an EOS M amongst others.
However, the G1x and G1x ll have virtually identical IQ looking at DPR files.
The M and Gx1 are both outstanding cameras. They both have great IQ.
The M has I think a slight edge in IQ. I cant tell the difference in IQ between the M and ANY of Canon's 18MP cameras, 7D included. You might if you examined the minutest detail at 200%,otherwise not.
The G1x comes close. I love the G1x; its a classic rangefinder style camera with all the knobs and buttons.
The M gets more airtime though.... Reason - I love its uncomplicated-ness and its' a sheer joy to use. I don't even know it's there half the time. No fiddling required. Solid build too, great size.
Very different cameras, close call as to IQ. Depends which feels more fun to use. Photography is about having fun. Only you can decide which makes you feel good about using it.
-
Peter Bendheim
www.peterbendheim.com
Hello Steve,I am considering both also. I am new to this forum (and not a troll). The major complaint has been on the M is the focusing speed. I am considering them for candid photography. Is the M acceptable? G1x acceptable. BTW, I shoot with a 5d m2 with Magic Lantern. Does ML work/ help the M?
Do you find yourself mostly using the M with the 22mm pancake? or with the longer kit lens?
I personally use the 18-55 mostly, with the 22 in certain situations - low light, family stuff, if I have time for tripod and can get the right FOV, etc. My next add will be the 55-250 EF-S STM + adapter, then the 11-22 OR I may buy an SL1 or SL2 when/if it comes out. My main goal right now is having fun shooting pix!I don't really need zoom for a particular style of photography. I just like the convenience of it.
Not for mine, the 18-55 covers about 75% of what I shoot.If you just had the M with the 22mm, would that be enough for 90% of average photo subjects? Sorry if that sounds confusing. Is the M with 22mm pancake along enough camera for most peoples day to day shooting needs?
Well I find that a lot of people here are too concerned with gear and not concerned enough about using the gear to take great pix and have fun. There are enough good souls that want to help, and give really good advice, that I still check in frequently...whatever you decide, enjoy!thanks for the input.
PS this thread is starting to stink of T.R.O.L.Lsss what's up DPR? kick these guys out already!
No, I would not pay that for such a lens.Let's face it, if there was a 15-70mm f2-3.9 pancake lens for the EOS M, we'd all pay $800 for it, wouldn't we? That would be amazing. So to me, it's worth it just for the lens. EOS M has the 35mm equiv f2 pancake and the G1X II has a 24mm f2 pancake that zoom to 120mm f4 when needed.
Abu, you've said this about the G1X MkII before. What exactly do you not like about the MkII lens?No, I would not pay that for such a lens.Let's face it, if there was a 15-70mm f2-3.9 pancake lens for the EOS M, we'd all pay $800 for it, wouldn't we? That would be amazing. So to me, it's worth it just for the lens. EOS M has the 35mm equiv f2 pancake and the G1X II has a 24mm f2 pancake that zoom to 120mm f4 when needed.