Getting up tight with the 75/1.8

Jim Salvas

Veteran Member
Messages
5,671
Solutions
7
Reaction score
4,546
Location
West Chester, PA, US
I went to a backyard party on Saturday and shot with both my 12-40 and 75, mostly on the E-M1, but a few on the PM2. Once again, I came away loving the shots from the 75/1.8, because it gets so close and personal. I even like it when it crops out the tops of heads or bottoms of chins.

I'll put a few of these candid portraits in my next post.
 
e52c54b394684c299f892b6a4749be2d.jpg

714f8c2a43d046ba9475a772725cb1f1.jpg

da3a7bf1509a4e6e985f1d99d752f7f2.jpg

253541fd1c15483ea0e84d1344d4a223.jpg

c625ea130805479ea157154aa3b73462.jpg

55d202b2e6ba48f1b42321e96aae19d7.jpg

dc58457dfd92484f8d5cde4c615c28bc.jpg

9fbf810a522045c89e383f444989c763.jpg





487397cf1ac34d6c8c3eb0b623393d5f.jpg



--
Jim Salvas
 
Last edited:
I like em. You use the lens well, I think the way it is meant to be used.
 
It's definitely a great lens for outdoor portraiture. Nice shots.
 
Very nice! I love the one where they are taking a selfie and you can see the phone in reflected in his sunglasses, don't know why, just think its a neat twist. :)
 
I wouldn't part with my 75mm for anything.
 
Happy people..

Nice candid shots
 
Very nice! Love them portraits! :)
 
Wonderful series of informal portraits. Yes, the 75/1.8 is a great lens.
 
Very nice! I love the one where they are taking a selfie and you can see the phone in reflected in his sunglasses, don't know why, just think its a neat twist. :)
Yeah, a lot of those candids were the people aren't even looking at the camera came out quite nice indeed! Makes me wanna add that 75mm to my wishlist... :p
 
The 75mm is indeed a great lens. However, from my experience, 95% of the time, I am almost certain that there is little discernible image quality difference between it and the Sigma 60mm f/2.8, especially for the type of shots that you have shown, i.e. from f/2.8 to f/4. There may be 5% of the time, most probably much less, when I actually need that extra speed faster than f/2.8 or want to use it at that aperture due to the hassle in focusing and in fact inadequate DOF for most tight head shots. I can understand however how fondly most owners talk about the lens, due to its build, its AF, and extra bokeh or emotional reasons. For most portrait shooting with reasonable lighting, honestly, I have to say that the difference between the Sigma and the 75mm in actual use and in results is negligible. The IQ difference is more noticeable when comparing one of these lenses with the 45mm f/1.8.
 
Last edited:
The 75mm is indeed a great lens. However, from my experience, 95% of the time, I am almost certain that there is little discernible image quality difference between it and the Sigma 60mm f/2.8, especially for the type of shots that you have shown, i.e. from f/2.8 to f/4. There may be 5% of the time, most probably much less, when I actually need that extra speed faster than f/2.8 or want to use it at that aperture due to the hassle in focusing and in fact inadequate DOF for most tight head shots. I can understand however how fondly most owners talk about the lens, due to its build, its AF, and extra bokeh or emotional reasons. For most portrait shooting with reasonable lighting, honestly, I have to say that the difference between the Sigma and the 75mm in actual use and in results is negligible. The IQ difference is more noticeable when comparing one of these lenses with the 45mm f/1.8.
You may be right. However, ever since starting to use this lens, I've been booking more paid headshot work. Just today, I signed another corporate client for ten headshots. This was a referral from another job I shot with the lens.

Maybe I'm superstitious, but I'm not going to push my luck by using something else.
 
Very nice shots. Perfect use of the long focal length. People look very lively. I would open the lens up in the 3rd shot to 1.8 to get rid of the people in the background.
 
Very nice shots. Perfect use of the long focal length. People look very lively. I would open the lens up in the 3rd shot to 1.8 to get rid of the people in the background.
Thanks. I was shooting fast and didn't notice that. Stopping down allows for some safety when snapping them off quickly.
 
It's a fun, and challenging lens. Like your set, and especially the gal in the striped top, facing the camera directly. The portrait is full of character and energy.

Am still learning the lens and one challenge is getting the focus plane right when shooting action with it opened up. You can have 1/8000 motion freezing but it's brutally easy to miss precise focus. Worth the effort when you nail it, though, because the background just dissolves.

Cheers,

Rick
 
It's a fun, and challenging lens. Like your set, and especially the gal in the striped top, facing the camera directly. The portrait is full of character and energy.

Am still learning the lens and one challenge is getting the focus plane right when shooting action with it opened up. You can have 1/8000 motion freezing but it's brutally easy to miss precise focus. Worth the effort when you nail it, though, because the background just dissolves.

Cheers,

Rick
 
I went to a backyard party on Saturday and shot with both my 12-40 and 75, mostly on the E-M1, but a few on the PM2. Once again, I came away loving the shots from the 75/1.8, because it gets so close and personal. I even like it when it crops out the tops of heads or bottoms of chins.

I'll put a few of these candid portraits in my next post.
Great shots, really shows off this lens.

My problem is that after getting this magnificent prime it has escalated my photo budget, because it performs so well I am hesitant to get any zoom including the 12-40 which is rated so highly.



--
Regards Jim
We All Need Water!



SignatureLine2007.jpg
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top