Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm curious about the focusing speed also, how quick is it compared to the say G15 or G16? ThanksGreg, for me, it is all about speed. The IQ of the G1X is just fine for me, so the move to next model depends on speed. Did overall responsiveness improve? Have you tried fast moving subjects yet?
Best, Michael
The AF and general operation of the Mk II is much improved over the MkI. That said, general speed is still somewhere in point and shoot territory. In comparison, my Fuji X-T1 with 18-55 focuses faster and is faster to take the shot.Thanks, Greg. My issue with the G1x was not so much the speed of focusiing but the overall "sluggishness" (somewhat). So when I wanted to capture an expression (a snapshot) of a face at a party or event, more often than not I failed because of the combination AF speed and shutter delay. Hope that has improved.
Hi Michael,Thanks, Greg. My issue with the G1x was not so much the speed of focusiing but the overall "sluggishness" (somewhat). So when I wanted to capture an expression (a snapshot) of a face at a party or event, more often than not I failed because of the combination AF speed and shutter delay. Hope that has improved.
Not to be flippant! But, this is a "Point & Shoot" camera, albeit a very good one!The AF and general operation of the Mk II is much improved over the MkI. That said, general speed is still somewhere in point and shoot territory.Thanks, Greg. My issue with the G1x was not so much the speed of focusiing but the overall "sluggishness" (somewhat). So when I wanted to capture an expression (a snapshot) of a face at a party or event, more often than not I failed because of the combination AF speed and shutter delay. Hope that has improved.
In comparison, my Fuji X-T1 with 18-55 focuses faster and is faster to take the shot.
I agree up to a point. It also matters that IQ has not gone backwards. I'm concerned about all the less than sharp pictures I see which have been posted to date. The G1X was such great performer...Really hope they didn't wreck that in the MkII.Greg, for me, it is all about speed. The IQ of the G1X is just fine for me, so the move to next model depends on speed. Did overall responsiveness improve? Have you tried fast moving subjects yet?
Best, Michael
Agreed!Not to be flippant! But, this is a "Point & Shoot" camera, albeit a very good one!The AF and general operation of the Mk II is much improved over the MkI. That said, general speed is still somewhere in point and shoot territory.Thanks, Greg. My issue with the G1x was not so much the speed of focusiing but the overall "sluggishness" (somewhat). So when I wanted to capture an expression (a snapshot) of a face at a party or event, more often than not I failed because of the combination AF speed and shutter delay. Hope that has improved.
I definitely agree with you on this. We have a few folks here who are at the least rushing to judgement at best, or who have an agenda against the camera at worst. Meanwhile, actual owners like us seem to be pretty happy with the camera.I have owned many cameras and the G1X MK2 has little problem with lack of sharpness or noise. Sounds more like "sour grapes" to me.
Not worth it to you perhaps but I'm not sure everyone will apply your 'value' criteria in quite this way, i.e. "You can have an EOS 100D or 600D with kit lens for half price" So what? I can get a nice SUV for much less that the price of, say, a 911. That is if I happened to want an SUV.I didn't want to touch country politics and pricing. This is not the case. I can afford that cam but this is just not worth. Maybe other cams are in different class, but this difference in IQ is so big that it pushed me to think about different class. You can have EOS 100D or 600D with kit lens for half price, some Nikons also, or even 1100D for "fraction" of that price, still with better image quality. This is just too much what they ask for the output.
--
Why does he do it?