Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very kind words - thank you!I really like your " eye". I had a look around on your flickr site. Quite some good level stuff. your own style and definately high standard .. Nice to have you here in the forum
have a noce day
MeaC


I actually do have a Codachrome 400 around somewhere... My biggest problem is that these Ilford are doing pretty great except for when kept in about 30 celcius / 80% humidity for a while.interesting shots. Its a shame there isnt more on the right side of the second picture; if you had all of the three figures, that would make a nice series across the frame. I'm guessing you were using the 50mm for these, which can be a bit long if you arent used to it--looks like a 35 might have been about right for both of these to me.
I also think that as presented these both look bunched up in the highlights and shadows, with a steep, relatively empty expanse in the midtones. That could be down to scanning, or development, or film... You might consider a more forgiving bw film for use in bright light--even hp5, despite the speed, is a good choice, but if you want a slower speed for sunlight, fp4 is also excellent, and gives you a lot of latitude in your exposures. Personally i default to tri-x, but hp5 is both more forgiving and more sensitive.
Hope you experiment with more film and bring us back what you find--
I have a little folder with burned JPEG files I call uploaded where I tag the individual as to where I've uploaded itsorry for repeated posting. Is there a way I can see what I already posted here and what not or should one keep record for himself in that respect. ?
Perhaps you should see a neurologist.sorry for repeated posting. Is there a way I can see what I already posted here and what not or should one keep record for himself in that respect. ?