Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll guess we will know once the owners manual is available on line. It would be nice if Fuji paid attention to that.Anyone know if the X-T1 is better at shooting video than it's priors?
Thanks.
At least there's hope. When I bought my 5DII it had the exact same problem--no manual video controls at all. People complained, and a few months later Canon added FULL manual video control of all settings and added broadcast accurate frame rates, including 24p. That was just one single FW update!Anyone know if the X-T1 is better at shooting video than it's priors?
Thanks.
Ok that is hopeful.At least there's hope. When I bought my 5DII it had the exact same problem--no manual video controls at all. People complained, and a few months later Canon added FULL manual video control of all settings and added broadcast accurate frame rates, including 24p. That was just one single FW update!![]()
Same line removal moire as the 5DII and many other hi-res still cameras used for video. One learns to deal with it like Fox TV did when they shot an entire episode of HOUSE with the 5DII.It looks worse
Autofocus algorithms, autoexposure algorithms, face-tracking algorithms. In fact, anything that supplies a feature that at least one competitor lacks.Ok that is hopeful.At least there's hope. When I bought my 5DII it had the exact same problem--no manual video controls at all. People complained, and a few months later Canon added FULL manual video control of all settings and added broadcast accurate frame rates, including 24p. That was just one single FW update!![]()
But like 5DII someone should come up with a firmware hack.
X-T1 will have such a potential! (Manual video controls, RAW video, extra bracketing steps ...)
I wish all the manufacturers would make the firmware open source. Other than the Fuji's jpeg algorithm I can't think of a reason why not to.
As they stole all the features from Canon when it was hacked?Autofocus algorithms, autoexposure algorithms, face-tracking algorithms. In fact, anything that supplies a feature that at least one competitor lacks.Ok that is hopeful.At least there's hope. When I bought my 5DII it had the exact same problem--no manual video controls at all. People complained, and a few months later Canon added FULL manual video control of all settings and added broadcast accurate frame rates, including 24p. That was just one single FW update!![]()
But like 5DII someone should come up with a firmware hack.
X-T1 will have such a potential! (Manual video controls, RAW video, extra bracketing steps ...)
I wish all the manufacturers would make the firmware open source. Other than the Fuji's jpeg algorithm I can't think of a reason why not to.
--
john carson