D700 over DF for a travel photographer?

Messages
35
Reaction score
20
Location
Shanghai
I'm a travel photographer. With all the new cameras coming out (DF, I'm looking at you), is there any reason for me to get something new? Will a DF give me better images? I don't think so, but I'd love to hear other people's thoughts otherwise.

5f36bf8e5d3b45258f4495aad5e8cc88.jpg



2fa1127280f74d679b8b350d09c9445f.jpg



d4d47ae4b0764bdbbc858f544d86ff9e.jpg



e4060f8d8b824094ad44b79d82e0ff19.jpg



884876e3d58c4478b3300c3287919c1f.jpg



7ae2f9266aef4824a3d7e98565cd93dd.jpg



3741dd32f7f643a9b1346a7ca7dc2ecd.jpg



9c365383e357461d84378b66b25d6eb4.jpg



014061aee41043bdb9d5ffdc866b2f30.jpg



fe3d1dcd6f7c429ab8ea3744992fd9d0.jpg



03f4ac6ff4554a1e8144a9fa22fc2d92.jpg

b8193f2363a743399b93bd2438e98921.jpg

--
patricklovephotography.com/blog
 
You, sir, are rocking the D700. I wouldn't change a thing unless your clients are demanding more.
 
Well the DF would give you better shadow detail on the fire eater but that's about it.
 
Only a weight savings, more dynamic range, and a little higher ISO capabilities.

You will lose the built in flash, if that means anything to you.

You get a warranty. It will cost you about $1500 more than what you sell the D700 for.
 
D700 is a great camera, but I just sold mine. It is a heavy camera for travel & hand holding. Replaced it with a D610 & my hand says "thank you". I've always preferred heavier cameras, but as I get older, my hands hurt me more. May be to the fact I've had the radial artery removed from each arm from the hand to almost the elbow & I will forever have nerve damage as well.
 
I'm a travel photographer. With all the new cameras coming out (DF, I'm looking at you), is there any reason for me to get something new? Will a DF give me better images? I don't think so, but I'd love to hear other people's thoughts otherwise.

5f36bf8e5d3b45258f4495aad5e8cc88.jpg

2fa1127280f74d679b8b350d09c9445f.jpg

d4d47ae4b0764bdbbc858f544d86ff9e.jpg

e4060f8d8b824094ad44b79d82e0ff19.jpg

884876e3d58c4478b3300c3287919c1f.jpg

7ae2f9266aef4824a3d7e98565cd93dd.jpg

3741dd32f7f643a9b1346a7ca7dc2ecd.jpg

9c365383e357461d84378b66b25d6eb4.jpg

014061aee41043bdb9d5ffdc866b2f30.jpg

fe3d1dcd6f7c429ab8ea3744992fd9d0.jpg

03f4ac6ff4554a1e8144a9fa22fc2d92.jpg

b8193f2363a743399b93bd2438e98921.jpg

--
patricklovephotography.com/blog
D700 is a perfectly fine camera for photographer, especially if you shoot RAW and process with well crafted colour profiles.

The only issue I have with it is hotshoe & general durability issues. I live in the tropics and grip rubber starts wearing out within 2 or 3 months on average. If you shoot regularly or use heavy lenses it could wear out weeks after a change. I'm also worried to get a second hand D700 due to the possible older internals. Sensor, weight & size wise the D700 is the perfect travel cam. Nowadays I do not like to take street photos when travelling as the D3S & D4 are far too intimidating. But the D700 with older, smaller AF-D lenses is real sweet for quick captures on the street. Based on years of use, I find the D700 still has the most balanced AF-C performance, not too fidgety & very accurate.
 
I'm a travel photographer. With all the new cameras coming out (DF, I'm looking at you), is there any reason for me to get something new? Will a DF give me better images? I don't think so, but I'd love to hear other people's thoughts otherwise.

5f36bf8e5d3b45258f4495aad5e8cc88.jpg

2fa1127280f74d679b8b350d09c9445f.jpg

d4d47ae4b0764bdbbc858f544d86ff9e.jpg

e4060f8d8b824094ad44b79d82e0ff19.jpg

884876e3d58c4478b3300c3287919c1f.jpg

7ae2f9266aef4824a3d7e98565cd93dd.jpg

3741dd32f7f643a9b1346a7ca7dc2ecd.jpg

9c365383e357461d84378b66b25d6eb4.jpg

014061aee41043bdb9d5ffdc866b2f30.jpg

fe3d1dcd6f7c429ab8ea3744992fd9d0.jpg

03f4ac6ff4554a1e8144a9fa22fc2d92.jpg

b8193f2363a743399b93bd2438e98921.jpg

--
patricklovephotography.com/blog
D700 or Df, you are a fantastic creator of images, so i say, take your pick man.
 
There is a long list of advantages. Remember that the D700 is years old. Add these improvements to those already mentioned...

- better ISO sensitivity
- 16 MP resolution
- 100% viewfinder frame coverage
- SD card slot
- additional picture controls.
 
 
Prior to getting the Df I wanted another camera for travel that performed better in low light conditions. My typical travel kit consisted of the D300 with a 12-24 f4, 28-70 f2.8, a macro lens 60 f2.8 and the 70-200 f2.8. As well as assorted cables, a flash, batteries, extra memory cards, etc. I live by the rule it is better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it, so I take enough to cover most of my perceived needs. On a trip to the Gobi this year, out of my 35lb weight limit, my camera gear was 14lbs. Needless to say, I had to have another passenger check my gear as he was traveling light. My most recent trip to China, I took the D300 with the 35 f1.8 DX, 50 f1.8d and the 18-70 DX. I used the 35 for most of the trip and the other 2 occasionally, walking around with a light sling bag. I had some back pain from that setup.

When I first handled the Df I noticed the weight difference right away, so much so that I considered not getting it. The Fuji X20 was the other camera I considered for a travel camera. After the 3rd time handling one, I pulled out the D300 and compared the weight, I then realized this new camera while lighter was also going to be a FF with a lot higher ISO capability similar to the D4, which meant more hand held shots without the need for a flash, has a battery which allows 1400 shots (again, less weight in the bag) and uses less expensive SD cards. That clinched it for me. For the rest of the trip I popped the 50 on the body and used the Df. I took out the other lens, extra battery and memory cards and was very happy with the lighter bag, light weight around my neck and no more back pain.

The D700 has more pro features that the Df do not have which is something to consider as well however, to me, as a FF camera for travel I much prefer it to all the other Nikon offering. The lighter weight means I can have it with me more often than I would the D300. If you have not yet checked out the Df, you should. You might be tempted to add that to your bag. No one can say if it will be for you or not, you ill decide once you have spent some time with it. I eventually got mime after handling it at 6 different shops in Hong Kong over a few hours. I am happy with my decision.
 
Great a shots. For speed, precision, image quality and general all round reliability, the D700 certainly is hard to beat. A D700 with a low shutter count is a rare beast indeed these days and if I saw one, I would snap it up in a heartbeat.
 
You're obviously making the most out of your equipment. No need to change unless you shoot at ISO 3200+ regularly. If you do, the fantastic high ISO of the Df might be reason enough to trade up.
 
AF-C - agree - 700 AF performance is just really "well sorted" as the Brits like to say ...

to the OP - stick with what you know - when it's worn out - then replace
 
Great point! I lived in SE Asia for two years (now I'm in Shanghai). The rubber on my D700 is all coming unglued as well. I re-apply superglue every now and then, but that is not a permanent solution.

I think I'm going to wait for the Nikon DF2 with better focus and shutter speed :-). Hopefully, the rubber will stay put. In SE Asia my body and lenses spend a lot of time around salt water. Weather sealing and good glue is critical for travel cameras.
 
Agreed. I think I'm in an, 'if it aint broke..." type of situation.
 
Great perspective. Thank you for your comments.
 
You certainly don't need to hanker over this latest incarnation, you are doing just fine. I love my D700 and just paid more than what I would for a brand new DF or D800 and bought a mint D3x. I could not be happier and am not worried one little bit that both of my cameras are 'old' technology. They took great pic's when they were introduced and still do.

Like me - let your pic's do the talking.

Sutto

philipsuttonphotography.com
 
Great a shots. For speed, precision, image quality and general all round reliability, the D700 certainly is hard to beat. A D700 with a low shutter count is a rare beast indeed these days and if I saw one, I would snap it up in a heartbeat.
I have two of those rare beasts with low actuations. After much contemplation of 610/800/Df, I'm sticking with them.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top