Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I started off scratching quite a bit, but now I'm guessing you meant to write "Who's keeping their FZ70 and who's sent their's back? Mine went back" LOL .. I'm probably going to buy myself one, regardless of how poor your pics appear, because I've actually seen lots of "acceptable" quality bird pics. It's probably in the camera settings somewhereHo keep there FZ70 and sent there 's back mine went back
Sure do wish that camera had a remote shutter release socket, though.Wow Gary , those pics are fantastic, just goes to show that the person behind the camera is often the culprit when poor results are the issue and not the camera.
People need to remember that.
Excellent shots, Gary. This says a lot for the camera actually which is why I'll probably get it just for the sake of birds.So far I still have mine. Samples below. I know these are just web sized samples. I still haven't printed anything from mine. But I believe Michael Reichmann when he says he printed a very nice 13x19 print from it. And looking at my own shots I'm sure they would print fine at that size too, as long as I don't try to crop much. With a 1200mm lens you shouldn't need to crop a lot.
I don't use it as "my only camera", if I could only keep one compact it would be my FZ200. Instead, I use it as a long reach camera when I want to travel extra light.
Thanks. It's kind of a difficult camera to use, sort of. Slower aperture with such a long focal length. It really takes a steady hand. The image quality is OK and it takes a little more aggressive work in post to get what I like. What I mean is, more aggressive noise reduction and more aggressive sharpening after that. You have to be careful not to over-sharpen.Wow Gary , those pics are fantastic, just goes to show that the person behind the camera is often the culprit when poor results are the issue and not the camera.
People need to remember that.
Only with the Panasonic LT55 and the Olympus B300. In both cases the FZ70 produced better results. I have not tried the larger Nikon TC that is popular with some people in this forum. That looks like the best TC to use with these zooms. I haven't purchased one or tried one at this point. I was pretty discouraged with the previous TC experiences which is why I bought the FZ70. The Nikon might be a different story.Dogglet wrote: Have you ever compared the IQ of the 70 versus the FZ200 + a T/C lens + eZoom?
Thanks. That's how I view mine. I take it when I know I'll want the extra reach, and the lighting is mostly good. I live in So California so it's sunny most of the time. That really helps with such a slow aperture. If I don't care about the reach then I take the FZ200 instead.These are awesome shots, Gary.
I am going to have to check the FZ70 out as a companion to my FZ200.
Gary--Gorgeous shots! May I ask: Were you using a monopod/tripod when taking those shots? I'm wondering if that's the real key to getting a good shot at distance with this camera.
My hands shake a bit more than I'd like them to, so I use a tripod for high zoom shots, and the remote shutter lets me trigger without touching the camera.Sherm, what are the scenarios when you use the remote shutter? I have one for my FZ200, used it a little when I first got it by setting up the camera where some small birds would perch. Haven't used it for a while now though.
Unless you favor a smaller camera, it's hard to beat the FZ200. That f2.8 lens helps in lower lighting, overcast skies, etc. Very fast burst rate when needed also. Nice electronic viewfinder. Not everyone likes an electronic viewfinder, they're usually pretty small on cameras like that and not the easiest to use when wearing glasses. But it has the nice flip-out LCD for times when that works out better for someone. The FZ200 also has excellent video options. It's hard for me to recommend anything over the FZ200 unless something more pocket-sized is really needed or wanted.We are going to South Africa next summer and I am contemplating buying a FZ200 for the game reserve. Though I am wondering if the ZS25 (or whatever model is out then), with the clearviewer would be sufficient. Any thoughts?
Oh Gary, my man .. you're saying something I can totally relate to !! I already have the LT55 for the FZ150, which produces quite decent images. Appears that the FZ70 is no pushover in terms of its optics and long focal lengths. Shall I even ask if you tried out the LT55 on the FZ70 or would that be pushing my luck ?Only with the Panasonic LT55 and the Olympus B300. In both cases the FZ70 produced better results. I have not tried the larger Nikon TC that is popular with some people in this forum. That looks like the best TC to use with these zooms. I haven't purchased one or tried one at this point. I was pretty discouraged with the previous TC experiences which is why I bought the FZ70. The Nikon might be a different story.Dogglet wrote: Have you ever compared the IQ of the 70 versus the FZ200 + a T/C lens + eZoom?
I did, yes. Here's the result. Especially notice the foot/claw area, you can really see how in this case cropping is giving me better results. You also have to consider that shooting 2040mm by hand is nearly impossible. For this shot I had the camera steadied on a backpack sitting on a cement table. For those people who have the larger Nikon TC, the results might be noticeably better. I also don't discount that I might have a sub-par LT55. However my Olympus B300 gives me nearly identical results.Dogglet wrote: I already have the LT55 for the FZ150, which produces quite decent images. Appears that the FZ70 is no pushover in terms of its optics and long focal lengths. Shall I even ask if you tried out the LT55 on the FZ70 or would that be pushing my luck ?![]()