Free photographers wanted for Tennis Australia

I am not confused about anything and once again you don't seem to understand the board rules that you are supposed to moderate.
Sorry, I missed that 'rule'. Show me please.

I am allowed to participate in the forums all I want, express any opinion I want. When I disagree with you (or others) they seem to throw that up - that somehow I"m restricted on voicing my opinion, posting links, stating facts.
In what world is calling me worthless civil?
Gees.. you really can't read and comprehend too well, can you? Or are you trying to twist my words because i'm right and you can't admit it?

In a financial sense you are worth what you charge. If you are giving away your time at a loss then you are working for less than free. As in for NO WORTH. That can be stated as WORTHLESS. As in having no value.
You keep saying I am giving away my time at a loss. I have explained several times I am not.

You also have a way of calling names in away you can later claim you were misunderstood.

If you'll notice through this entire exchange I have not done the same however tempted I am to get down to your level.

You want everyone to admit you're right. I have explained several times now that what is right for you may not be what is right for someone else.

As I said this is now a dead horse and I'll be done unless you take another shot at me in which case I'm open to some fun.
 
I am not confused about anything and once again you don't seem to understand the board rules that you are supposed to moderate.
Sorry, I missed that 'rule'. Show me please.

I am allowed to participate in the forums all I want, express any opinion I want. When I disagree with you (or others) they seem to throw that up - that somehow I"m restricted on voicing my opinion, posting links, stating facts.
In what world is calling me worthless civil?
Gees.. you really can't read and comprehend too well, can you? Or are you trying to twist my words because i'm right and you can't admit it?

In a financial sense you are worth what you charge. If you are giving away your time at a loss then you are working for less than free. As in for NO WORTH. That can be stated as WORTHLESS. As in having no value.
You keep saying I am giving away my time at a loss. I have explained several times I am not.

You also have a way of calling names in away you can later claim you were misunderstood.

If you'll notice through this entire exchange I have not done the same however tempted I am to get down to your level.

You want everyone to admit you're right. I have explained several times now that what is right for you may not be what is right for someone else.

As I said this is now a dead horse and I'll be done unless you take another shot at me in which case I'm open to some fun.
YOU are defending MWACs. So the YOU i'm referring to is your logic, your position. Unless you show me your books and 1040 I have no idea what you're doing.

You keep accusing me of forcing my pricing on everyone -yet you have no facts about my pricing. I"m espousing a basic financial and accounting rules. You are not debating with me over those so I have to assume you agree with them.

Am I right? If you don't charge enough money to cover your expenses you do not make a profit. that is a FACT.
You must account for ALL EXPENSES - not just the ones you (proverbial) you feel are real. Your time is an expense - without your time there is no business, so it as value (or should). And since it is a business assett that has value it needs to be accounted for in the expense column.

How difficult is that to understand? Yet instead of acknowledging that you are playing the martyr and saying I'm calling you names. Or you say as a mod I'm not allowed to post or respond ot posts.

You say you run 5 business (if i counted right) yet you dont' seem able to discuss BUSINESS principals. That makes me suspect all you've said. Why? Because when I talk business to busines people they don't dispute basic facts of how one runs a business by sidestepping the issue and changing the subject.

I bring up that time has value and the time you spend on your business has value - in dollar terms. even if you don't cut yourself a physical check.
yet you completely ignore this...I thought for sure you'd argue it. Since you claim I'm telling you what to charge, what you're worth in the market, I totally expected you to have issue with my $15/hour value for a photog/business owner. Yet again, you ignore that premise completely and go off on some tangent claiming i'm calling you names, which I am not.

Lets talk business. Lets talk numbers. Lets talk accounting.

SHOW ME how you feel someone charging $50 for a 2+ hour session is making a proft. You seem to believe this is possible - so show me using math.
 
I am not confused about anything and once again you don't seem to understand the board rules that you are supposed to moderate.
Sorry, I missed that 'rule'. Show me please.

I am allowed to participate in the forums all I want, express any opinion I want. When I disagree with you (or others) they seem to throw that up - that somehow I"m restricted on voicing my opinion, posting links, stating facts.
In what world is calling me worthless civil?
Gees.. you really can't read and comprehend too well, can you? Or are you trying to twist my words because i'm right and you can't admit it?

In a financial sense you are worth what you charge. If you are giving away your time at a loss then you are working for less than free. As in for NO WORTH. That can be stated as WORTHLESS. As in having no value.
You keep saying I am giving away my time at a loss. I have explained several times I am not.

You also have a way of calling names in away you can later claim you were misunderstood.

If you'll notice through this entire exchange I have not done the same however tempted I am to get down to your level.

You want everyone to admit you're right. I have explained several times now that what is right for you may not be what is right for someone else.

As I said this is now a dead horse and I'll be done unless you take another shot at me in which case I'm open to some fun.
YOU are defending MWACs. So the YOU i'm referring to is your logic, your position. Unless you show me your books and 1040 I have no idea what you're doing.
SHOW ME how you feel someone charging $50 for a 2+ hour session is making a proft. You seem to believe this is possible - so show me using math.
 
Really? You're a professional photographer and don't know that term? You must be new then. MWAC - man with a camera aka, pro-wanna-be
Oh for god sakes. When I shoot an event for any of my customers I charge between 35 and 45 bucks an hour and that normally includes the time to process and create a web gallery for their website.
That explains a lot.
It's a little more than the 25 bucks an hour that you seem to hate so much but I can assure you I am making a profit even after paying all my expenses.

My expenses are not your expenses so please don't lecture me on what a real business should be charging or what expenses a real business should have.
If you are a REAL LEGITIMATE BUSINESS then you MUST have these expenses:

Camera, lens, flash, bag to carry it around. If you 'already owned this' I don't care - if the business is using it to make money then the busines has to pay for it.

Computer and software for editing, accounting, etc. If you 'already owned this' I don't care - if the business is using it to make money then the busines has to pay for it.

Phone and internet, website. If you 'already owned this' I don't care - if the business is using it to make money then the busines has to pay for it.

Desk to hold the computer, files, bank account, invoice book, chair to sit at when editing, calendar for appts, etc If you 'already owned this' I don't care - if the business is using it to make money then the busines has to pay for it.

Insurance, biz license. If you are a LEGIT business you need these things and they are not free. The business needs to pay them

The gray area...

Education and experience - you weren't born knowing what you know and it takes time and often money to learn. This is a cost that can be hard to account for. If you hire a kid to cut the grass vs someone with a degree in accounting it's obvious that you are paying more for teh acc't beacuse of his special knowledge and expertise and not for hours of labor alone.

Time and Labor - planning, marketing, selling, travel, cleaning, education (ongoing), book keeping all take time and that time needs paid for by the business. NOT just the shooting and editing.

If you add up your ACTUAL TIME I bet you find you spend MORE THAN HALF not shooting or editing. So that $35 an hour is suddenly $17 an hour.

And out of that $17 an hour you have to pay for your gear and all other expenses. And you have thousands invested in the business.

Now you could go wait tables and invest NOTHING and make 17 an hour, if not more (i've done it and see it done every day).

You have education and skills to be a photographer, what you do can last a lifetime and be priceless possesion, the ONE thing people want out of their burning house above all other physical possessions.

But if you feel you're entrepreneural risks, your time, your investment in gear and skills, isn't worth more than the girl that served you dinner last night I'm not sure I can help you.
And as I have said before I have all the proper insurance, liability, workers comp, and I even pay all applicable payroll taxes.

How do I determine if I'm making a profit? I cover all expenses including fuel, equipment, supplies and labor and then anything leftover is profit. With that profit I am able to feed myself, live indoors and pay my own health insurance. My wife works with me so there is no second income.

Keep trying to knock everyone who does business differently than you. Are there people working at a loss?
I bet they are.

$500 insurance. Gear and computer $5,000 prorated over 3 years (depreciation -they often last longer), 40 hours setting up the biz (could be 400 hours I suppose), 2 hours a week marketing (FB posts if nothing else) so that's 100 hours. 10 sessions at 3 hours each, 10 hours in selling, 5 hours in banking, 25 hours in cleaning/backup, etc (2/month is nothing) and I'm sure I'm forgetting something but get 210 hours for the year.

If a TYPICAL full time photog can make $30k a year and work 2k hours that's $15/hour. So the labor above

A home office deduction is worth at least $3k. Phone (1/2 for business? same for internet) is an easy $1k a year.

2000 miles on your car is worth $1000 (50c is low but round numbers work here)

So TIME is worth $3000, gear 1700, 500 insurance, 3000 office, 1000 phone/net, 1000 car...we are $10,000.

I say 10 sessions...so do you know anyone making $1000 a session? From your numbers I'm ASSUMING ( bad to do I know) $200-300 is your average.

Is it possible to make a profit with these numbers? Nope.

What MWACs seem to do is ignore most of these expenses - home office, phone, interent, car. But without these things the business could not exist. To discount their efficacy is to not be following generally accepted accounting principles - aka, the real costs are being hidden to make the company look protiftable.

This is exaclty what enron did. And their execs went to jail for doing it.

So yes, I tend to say anyone that does the same thing is running an illegal business. Now if you want to call it a HOBBY, then that's different. But nobody wants to do that as it's not as ego building as being a business owner.
If that model is not sustainable what are you worried about?

And I could survive and pay my bills working at 25 bucks an hour. I would have to sell more jobs but I would still make money.
I see it over and over again...I suggest photographers charge more and I'm the one that's an idiot?

If you could make THREE TIMES AS MUCH MONEY, why would choose NOT TO?

I'm just dumbfounded as to why you or anyone would choose not to.
 
Really? You're a professional photographer and don't know that term? You must be new then. MWAC - man with a camera aka, pro-wanna-be
Oh for god sakes. When I shoot an event for any of my customers I charge between 35 and 45 bucks an hour and that normally includes the time to process and create a web gallery for their website.
That explains a lot.
It's a little more than the 25 bucks an hour that you seem to hate so much but I can assure you I am making a profit even after paying all my expenses.

My expenses are not your expenses so please don't lecture me on what a real business should be charging or what expenses a real business should have.
If you are a REAL LEGITIMATE BUSINESS then you MUST have these expenses:

Camera, lens, flash, bag to carry it around. If you 'already owned this' I don't care - if the business is using it to make money then the busines has to pay for it.

Computer and software for editing, accounting, etc. If you 'already owned this' I don't care - if the business is using it to make money then the busines has to pay for it.

Phone and internet, website. If you 'already owned this' I don't care - if the business is using it to make money then the busines has to pay for it.

Desk to hold the computer, files, bank account, invoice book, chair to sit at when editing, calendar for appts, etc If you 'already owned this' I don't care - if the business is using it to make money then the busines has to pay for it.

Insurance, biz license. If you are a LEGIT business you need these things and they are not free. The business needs to pay them

The gray area...

Education and experience - you weren't born knowing what you know and it takes time and often money to learn. This is a cost that can be hard to account for. If you hire a kid to cut the grass vs someone with a degree in accounting it's obvious that you are paying more for teh acc't beacuse of his special knowledge and expertise and not for hours of labor alone.

Time and Labor - planning, marketing, selling, travel, cleaning, education (ongoing), book keeping all take time and that time needs paid for by the business. NOT just the shooting and editing.

If you add up your ACTUAL TIME I bet you find you spend MORE THAN HALF not shooting or editing. So that $35 an hour is suddenly $17 an hour.

And out of that $17 an hour you have to pay for your gear and all other expenses. And you have thousands invested in the business.

Now you could go wait tables and invest NOTHING and make 17 an hour, if not more (i've done it and see it done every day).

You have education and skills to be a photographer, what you do can last a lifetime and be priceless possesion, the ONE thing people want out of their burning house above all other physical possessions.

But if you feel you're entrepreneural risks, your time, your investment in gear and skills, isn't worth more than the girl that served you dinner last night I'm not sure I can help you.
And as I have said before I have all the proper insurance, liability, workers comp, and I even pay all applicable payroll taxes.

How do I determine if I'm making a profit? I cover all expenses including fuel, equipment, supplies and labor and then anything leftover is profit. With that profit I am able to feed myself, live indoors and pay my own health insurance. My wife works with me so there is no second income.

Keep trying to knock everyone who does business differently than you. Are there people working at a loss?
I bet they are.

$500 insurance. Gear and computer $5,000 prorated over 3 years (depreciation -they often last longer), 40 hours setting up the biz (could be 400 hours I suppose), 2 hours a week marketing (FB posts if nothing else) so that's 100 hours. 10 sessions at 3 hours each, 10 hours in selling, 5 hours in banking, 25 hours in cleaning/backup, etc (2/month is nothing) and I'm sure I'm forgetting something but get 210 hours for the year.

If a TYPICAL full time photog can make $30k a year and work 2k hours that's $15/hour. So the labor above

A home office deduction is worth at least $3k. Phone (1/2 for business? same for internet) is an easy $1k a year.

2000 miles on your car is worth $1000 (50c is low but round numbers work here)

So TIME is worth $3000, gear 1700, 500 insurance, 3000 office, 1000 phone/net, 1000 car...we are $10,000.

I say 10 sessions...so do you know anyone making $1000 a session? From your numbers I'm ASSUMING ( bad to do I know) $200-300 is your average.

Is it possible to make a profit with these numbers? Nope.

What MWACs seem to do is ignore most of these expenses - home office, phone, interent, car. But without these things the business could not exist. To discount their efficacy is to not be following generally accepted accounting principles - aka, the real costs are being hidden to make the company look protiftable.

This is exaclty what enron did. And their execs went to jail for doing it.

So yes, I tend to say anyone that does the same thing is running an illegal business. Now if you want to call it a HOBBY, then that's different. But nobody wants to do that as it's not as ego building as being a business owner.
If that model is not sustainable what are you worried about?

And I could survive and pay my bills working at 25 bucks an hour. I would have to sell more jobs but I would still make money.
I see it over and over again...I suggest photographers charge more and I'm the one that's an idiot?

If you could make THREE TIMES AS MUCH MONEY, why would choose NOT TO?

I'm just dumbfounded as to why you or anyone would choose not to.

--
Don't seek advice from someone who is not where you want to be - CJ Lewis
My opinions are my own and not those of DPR or its administration. They carry no 'special' value
Oh brother. I have all those expenses (my gear probablly doesn't cost as much as yours) and I can still make a profit.

My profit is probablly not as much as yours but I am working steady and enjoying life.

It is really tiresome for you to continually suggest I have no idea how to run a business or that I am not running a real legit business because I do it differently than you.

I own a lot of equipment for my main business. Most of it has been paid for for many years. That gives me an advantage over the new guy starting out who has to buy all the equipment new. That goes for my camera gear, computer, vehicle, and all those other things you mentioned.

I make enough profit and am prepared to purchase new equipment when the need arises.

And as I stated I do have a professional accountant (my dad) and he is very familiar with standard business accounting, it's kinda what he did for his entire life.

Oh, and you're gonna love this, you better sit down, I don't pay him. I did just get back from spending several hours on his 2 acres doing yard work so it's a fair exchange. Plus he likes me.

That's another one of those unfair advantages I have.

Maybe you should sit down and figure out which expenses you could cut or maybe find an accountant who knows what he's doing to help you out.

And one last thing I never asked for help. I'm doing fine, really I am, but it's nice you care so much.

You really just seem very angry at anyone who can earn a living doing what you used to be able to do. Life is really too short. Relax, maybe even retire or wait those tables for 17 bucks an hour. Maybe less stress will put you in a better mood.

Oh well, I've got nothing to do right now so I think I'll edit my daughter's vacation photos and get her wedding website designed. I wonder if I should charge her.
 
I am earning a lviing at photography and ONLY photography. I don't have to 'underwrite' or support my photography business with income from another enterprise or day job.

Maybe you are lucky enough to not have to advertise, run without gear coverage and only liability. Maybe you're shooting with a 10D and kit lens so don't have gear expenses. Maybe you shoot and burn so have no online sales costs, product costs, don't have samples to show customers (that need updated so as to not look out of date which hurts sales).

More power to ya.

But having been full time for nearly 7 years now and part time before that (weddings only plus a part time job) I know what time it takes and what expenses there are.

I have talked with MWACs and seen their phony accounting practices. Yes, if your gear is paid for it's not an 'expense' day to day but gear wears out, breaks, goes out of date. So you need to set aside some money for when you do upgrade a body.
It does depend I guess on how much you do where and how. If you do 10 sessions a year and never leave your studio vs handing gear over to employees that go shoot weddings or sports out in the weather you won't need to worry about gear as much so spend less on it.

Many photogs are gear hogs - they gotta have the latest greatest newest thingy. I bought my last body because my 2 main ones were 3 years old. No sign of reliability issues upcoming but losing a body during a shoot and being without it 5-10 days isn't acceptable. A planned expense is better than a surprise any day.

Same for home office - it's a tax deduction more than a cash flow expense, but I know my elec bill is up with my working from home vs when I went out to work. Same for yard expenses, and snow removal.

Regardless, It is very very very unlikely $35/hour is profitable - and you have yet to prove otherwise. So I suppose I'm right.

Besides, you should be able to get double that and lose no business or at most 10-15%. But if you do 85% of the hours at 200% of the income I think you'd see that is a better deal.

And $70/ an hour is less than most other service businesses charge - car repair, furnace repair, plumbers, electricians, lawyers, financial planners, etc. I'm sure if one of them COULD charge half as much and be profitable they would - they'd surely have all the business they can handle.
 
Regardless, It is very very very unlikely $35/hour is profitable - and you have yet to prove otherwise. So I suppose I'm right.
What would you like? My income tax returns and my yearly profit and loss statement? Would you like to see my proof of insurance and declaration page listing all my gear that is insured? Would you like to see my articles of incorporation? How about my federal tax ID? How about a copy of my business checking account?

You have yet to prove any of your statements so I guess I'm right.

Hey, I like how that works.

$35 dollars an hour is profitable. Can you accept the fact that maybe, just maybe, I am able to live in a manner I think is comfortable on a lot less money than you need?

Maybe that's your problem, you need lots of money to be happy. I just need enough money to live indoors and eat.

You were nice enough to offer to help me so maybe a I can return the favor. I had a heart attack about 19 months ago. All of my doctors said most people don't survive the particular heart attack I had. 100% blockage full cardiac arrest.

Take it from someone who has seen the white light. Life is to short. Figure out a way to get happy and enjoy the very brief moment we have in this world.
 
YOu can't read or have memory issues?

I've shown you the math in this thread. I can't see 35/hr being profitable. show me YOUR math.

You just keep avoiding showing how your math works out. Either because you can't (don't know the numbers), it doesn't work out profitably and you know it - or you're afraid it won't work out profitably.

Reality is reality - ignoring it doesn't make it go away. If you're working for less than you thinnk it's best to find out sooner rather than later.

If you have $5k in overhead and $9k in labor that's $14,000 in costs. To be profitable you need to have sales in excess of that figure.

So -do you have 400 hours in sold work?

that's 20+ weddings or maybe 80 portrait sessions.

How much money you NEED is not the issue. Total sales is not the issue. Profit is the discussion here, not your standard of living. Quit trying to change the topic to avoid answering the question.

Great you survived the heart attack. Again, it has NOTHING to do with whether or not you're making a profit at $35/hour.

I can't see how it's possible to do it at that price. And you've not shown ANY numbers to demonstrate how you do it.

I have a home based business - no rent or the like. My expenses - cash out the door - this year so far is a bit over $25,000. 11k or so is lab costs and materials (prints, framing, etc). I do sports leagues which has a small margin - over 75% of that 11k is for the sports products.

So if I had NO product costs I'd still have $14,000 in expenses, PLUS gas in the car and home office expenses and cell phone costs (my wife's biz is paying the actual cellphone bill)

My time/labor isn't in those figures. I get what's left over after expenses are paid. If I tracked my time accurately I could give you an hourly figure, but alas, I don't. Some days I work alot and some months I do not work much at all. So this past month I probably make $8.hour but in feb I may get paid $100/hour - as I draw a salary every month regardless of sales that month.

And you've never addressed my question - and you are not alone in ignoring it - why don't you charge more money?


Lets make it more concrete, easier to answer, ok?
How did you arrive at the $35/hour you charge?

Regardless, It is very very very unlikely $35/hour is profitable - and you have yet to prove otherwise. So I suppose I'm right.
What would you like? My income tax returns and my yearly profit and loss statement? Would you like to see my proof of insurance and declaration page listing all my gear that is insured? Would you like to see my articles of incorporation? How about my federal tax ID? How about a copy of my business checking account?

You have yet to prove any of your statements so I guess I'm right.

Hey, I like how that works.

$35 dollars an hour is profitable. Can you accept the fact that maybe, just maybe, I am able to live in a manner I think is comfortable on a lot less money than you need?

Maybe that's your problem, you need lots of money to be happy. I just need enough money to live indoors and eat.

You were nice enough to offer to help me so maybe a I can return the favor. I had a heart attack about 19 months ago. All of my doctors said most people don't survive the particular heart attack I had. 100% blockage full cardiac arrest.

Take it from someone who has seen the white light. Life is to short. Figure out a way to get happy and enjoy the very brief moment we have in this world.
 
YOu can't read or have memory issues?

I've shown you the math in this thread. I can't see 35/hr being profitable. show me YOUR math.

You just keep avoiding showing how your math works out. Either because you can't (don't know the numbers), it doesn't work out profitably and you know it - or you're afraid it won't work out profitably.

Reality is reality - ignoring it doesn't make it go away. If you're working for less than you thinnk it's best to find out sooner rather than later.

If you have $5k in overhead and $9k in labor that's $14,000 in costs. To be profitable you need to have sales in excess of that figure.

So -do you have 400 hours in sold work?

that's 20+ weddings or maybe 80 portrait sessions.

How much money you NEED is not the issue. Total sales is not the issue. Profit is the discussion here, not your standard of living. Quit trying to change the topic to avoid answering the question.

Great you survived the heart attack. Again, it has NOTHING to do with whether or not you're making a profit at $35/hour.

I can't see how it's possible to do it at that price. And you've not shown ANY numbers to demonstrate how you do it.

I have a home based business - no rent or the like. My expenses - cash out the door - this year so far is a bit over $25,000. 11k or so is lab costs and materials (prints, framing, etc). I do sports leagues which has a small margin - over 75% of that 11k is for the sports products.

So if I had NO product costs I'd still have $14,000 in expenses, PLUS gas in the car and home office expenses and cell phone costs (my wife's biz is paying the actual cellphone bill)

My time/labor isn't in those figures. I get what's left over after expenses are paid. If I tracked my time accurately I could give you an hourly figure, but alas, I don't. Some days I work alot and some months I do not work much at all. So this past month I probably make $8.hour but in feb I may get paid $100/hour - as I draw a salary every month regardless of sales that month.

And you've never addressed my question - and you are not alone in ignoring it - why don't you charge more money?

Lets make it more concrete, easier to answer, ok?
How did you arrive at the $35/hour you charge?
I am not posting my numbers but you are assuming my expenses are the same as yours.

Of course my needs or standard of living is relevant. If my needs or standard of living is less than yours and I charge enough to cover my expenses the rest is profit even though it might be a much smaller amount then you need..

I arrived at my number the same way you arrive at yours. I will not post an expense report or profit and loss statement.

I am in business legitimately, legally and every other thing you accuse me of. I pay all me expenses and there is money left over. Profit.

I'm beginning to think that is what makes you so angry, that someone can do it a lot less than you and still make a profit.

Can you admit that it is possible to have a business with less expense than you allowing them to charge less than you?

I don't charge more money because I don't need to. I have enough business to earn me the money I need. I've managed to stay in business for close to 25 years, how do you explain being in business that long unless I was making a profit? Clearly it's possible to do it my way and not yours. (although my way is your way you just think expenses are the same for everyone)

The beauty about being happy with less is I don't have nearly as far to fall as you do. When the economy took a dump my expenses and pricing kept me going while others went out of business. I'm doing nothing wrong, I'm doing what works for me. You should try doing what works for you which appears to mean you should try something new.

You really should take my advice and relax a little before you pop a vein.
 
I am not posting my numbers but you are assuming my expenses are the same as yours.

Of course my needs or standard of living is relevant. If my needs or standard of living is less than yours and I charge enough to cover my expenses the rest is profit even though it might be a much smaller amount then you need..
WRONG! OMG, how wrong and twisted can your logic (or lack of) be? Apparently you know no end to trying to confuse matters.

BUSINESS is BUSINESS. What YOU get paid (or pay an employee) has NOTHING to do with it. You can eat caviar or live in a box - it doesn't matter as far as the business' profitablity is concerned.

Period.

You may own the business but you are NOT the business - it is it's own entitiy. It pays you (and any other employees). Whether you can live on what it pays has NOTHING to do with the business at all. Walmart is profitable but pays it's employees low wages. SEPARATE THINGS entirely.

if the business is profitable then it is profitable. Whether you can live on what it's paying you is a completely separate issue and has nothing to do with it's profitability. If you can't live on what it pays then you get a raise - and perhaps then teh business isn't profitable anymore (can't cover the labor expense).
I arrived at my number the same way you arrive at yours. I will not post an expense report or profit and loss statement.
Have I asked for that? I think not. Again, you read one thing and think another - twisting what I mean.

What have you spent on insurance this year? that I doubt is a trade secret. I spent 1100 on commercial auto, 550 on workers comp and 750ish on biz insurance. there, I did it- why can't you?
I am in business legitimately, legally and every other thing you accuse me of. I pay all me expenses and there is money left over. Profit.

I'm beginning to think that is what makes you so angry, that someone can do it a lot less than you and still make a profit.
You keep saying that but CANNOT EVEN ATTEMPT TO PROVE IT. You have yet to post any figure beyond $35.

All you keep saying is your profitable. we don't need your tax returns as proof.

As a business owner you must have plans, projections, budgets, etc.

Let me ask it a different way then...

SHOW ME HOW TO BE PROFITABLE AT 35/hour!

why not charge $70/hour and take half a year off work? I'm not suggesting you work more or be richer (not that anyone has ever turned down more money).

I assume if i charged less i'd be busier - but your price is 1/3 what i"m charging- well below costs.

Simple math proves it too - if my costs are 12k for OH, ad, insurance and I can bill for 1000 hours a year I need $12/hour just to cover overhead. I will work 1500 hours to bill for 1000 as I can't bill for planning, cleaning, education, backup, accounting, marketing, etc. If I want $15/hour (and honestly I want more than that) that divides out to $22.50 per billable hour. I'm at $34.50 per hour. Plus product costs...another $12/hour if divided out...$46.50. I have to pay taxes on my income so add $7k or $7/hour.

Now my COSTS are $53.50 an hour for 1000 hours of billable work. Working alone you can't bill every one of the 2000 in a work year. And to be honest if you want $30k a year over 1000 hours of billable work the per hour cost will he higher yet.

there is NO WAY $35/hour is profitable unless you're working for min wage and even then i'm not sure it is.

And this is without setting some money aside for a rainy day, business growth and reinvestment. and profit is after all that.

So your figure is about HALF of what is proftiable. THAT is why I don't believe you. the only way your numbers work is if you leave off ALL your expenses and don't count much of your labor.

Shooting for 2 hours and getting 70 dollars sounds like $35/hour but you have sales time, travel time, editing time, backup time, delivery of the product time, etc. SO that 2 hours is more realistically 4 hours. So $35 is wrong, it's $17.50 per BILLABLE hour.

If you disagree with my figures SHOW ME. How do YOU figure it?
Can you admit that it is possible to have a business with less expense than you allowing them to charge less than you?

I don't charge more money because I don't need to. I have enough business to earn me the money I need. I've managed to stay in business for close to 25 years, how do you explain being in business that long unless I was making a profit? Clearly it's possible to do it my way and not yours. (although my way is your way you just think expenses are the same for everyone)

The beauty about being happy with less is I don't have nearly as far to fall as you do. When the economy took a dump my expenses and pricing kept me going while others went out of business. I'm doing nothing wrong, I'm doing what works for me. You should try doing what works for you which appears to mean you should try something new.

You really should take my advice and relax a little before you pop a vein.
--
Don't seek advice from someone who is not where you want to be - CJ Lewis
My opinions are my own and not those of DPR or its administration. They carry no 'special' value
 
Last edited:
I am not posting my numbers but you are assuming my expenses are the same as yours.

Of course my needs or standard of living is relevant. If my needs or standard of living is less than yours and I charge enough to cover my expenses the rest is profit even though it might be a much smaller amount then you need..
WRONG! OMG, how wrong and twisted can your logic (or lack of) be? Apparently you know no end to trying to confuse matters.

BUSINESS is BUSINESS. What YOU get paid (or pay an employee) has NOTHING to do with it. You can eat caviar or live in a box - it doesn't matter as far as the business' profitablity is concerned.

Period.

You may own the business but you are NOT the business - it is it's own entitiy. It pays you (and any other employees). Whether you can live on what it pays has NOTHING to do with the business at all. Walmart is profitable but pays it's employees low wages. SEPARATE THINGS entirely.

if the business is profitable then it is profitable. Whether you can live on what it's paying you is a completely separate issue and has nothing to do with it's profitability. If you can't live on what it pays then you get a raise - and perhaps then teh business isn't profitable anymore (can't cover the labor expense).
I arrived at my number the same way you arrive at yours. I will not post an expense report or profit and loss statement.
Have I asked for that? I think not. Again, you read one thing and think another - twisting what I mean.

What have you spent on insurance this year? that I doubt is a trade secret. I spent 1100 on commercial auto, 550 on workers comp and 750ish on biz insurance. there, I did it- why can't you?
I am in business legitimately, legally and every other thing you accuse me of. I pay all me expenses and there is money left over. Profit.

I'm beginning to think that is what makes you so angry, that someone can do it a lot less than you and still make a profit.
You keep saying that but CANNOT EVEN ATTEMPT TO PROVE IT. You have yet to post any figure beyond $35.

All you keep saying is your profitable. we don't need your tax returns as proof.

As a business owner you must have plans, projections, budgets, etc.

Let me ask it a different way then...

SHOW ME HOW TO BE PROFITABLE AT 35/hour!

why not charge $70/hour and take half a year off work? I'm not suggesting you work more or be richer (not that anyone has ever turned down more money).

I assume if i charged less i'd be busier - but your price is 1/3 what i"m charging- well below costs.

Simple math proves it too - if my costs are 12k for OH, ad, insurance and I can bill for 1000 hours a year I need $12/hour just to cover overhead. I will work 1500 hours to bill for 1000 as I can't bill for planning, cleaning, education, backup, accounting, marketing, etc. If I want $15/hour (and honestly I want more than that) that divides out to $22.50 per billable hour. I'm at $34.50 per hour. Plus product costs...another $12/hour if divided out...$46.50. I have to pay taxes on my income so add $7k or $7/hour.

Now my COSTS are $53.50 an hour for 1000 hours of billable work. Working alone you can't bill every one of the 2000 in a work year. And to be honest if you want $30k a year over 1000 hours of billable work the per hour cost will he higher yet.

there is NO WAY $35/hour is profitable unless you're working for min wage and even then i'm not sure it is.

And this is without setting some money aside for a rainy day, business growth and reinvestment. and profit is after all that.

So your figure is about HALF of what is proftiable. THAT is why I don't believe you. the only way your numbers work is if you leave off ALL your expenses and don't count much of your labor.

Shooting for 2 hours and getting 70 dollars sounds like $35/hour but you have sales time, travel time, editing time, backup time, delivery of the product time, etc. SO that 2 hours is more realistically 4 hours. So $35 is wrong, it's $17.50 per BILLABLE hour.

If you disagree with my figures SHOW ME. How do YOU figure it?
Can you admit that it is possible to have a business with less expense than you allowing them to charge less than you?

I don't charge more money because I don't need to. I have enough business to earn me the money I need. I've managed to stay in business for close to 25 years, how do you explain being in business that long unless I was making a profit? Clearly it's possible to do it my way and not yours. (although my way is your way you just think expenses are the same for everyone)

The beauty about being happy with less is I don't have nearly as far to fall as you do. When the economy took a dump my expenses and pricing kept me going while others went out of business. I'm doing nothing wrong, I'm doing what works for me. You should try doing what works for you which appears to mean you should try something new.

You really should take my advice and relax a little before you pop a vein.
 
there is NO WAY $35/hour is profitable unless you're working for min wage and even then i'm not sure it is.

Shooting for 2 hours and getting 70 dollars sounds like $35/hour but you have sales time, travel time, editing time, backup time, delivery of the product time, etc. SO that 2 hours is more realistically 4 hours. So $35 is wrong, it's $17.50 per BILLABLE hour.

If you disagree with my figures SHOW ME. How do YOU figure it?
For the last time, your costs are not the same as everyone else.
Then what are your costs? If not in dollars then in items...insurance, camera, what???????
For the last time I am making a profit at 35 bucks an hour.
SHOW ME HOW! I'm charging nearly 3x times that to be profitable. If I could be proftiable at your price I'd do it tomorrow.

But I can't read minds...what is your secret to be profitable at that price point?
For the last time my expenses are much less than yours.
Then what are your expenses? If not in dollars then in items...insurance, camera, what???????
This is officially tiresome. You don't seem to be able to grasp a simple fact. Your expenses are not fixed for every business. You also don't seem to be able to grasp the fact that if I meet all my expenses (I do) and have a single penny left I am profitable. I can live off that penny, I am happy.
I"m REALLY confused as to why my expenses are so much higher than yours.

I pay insurance, you claim to.
I have a website, a phone - I assume you do to.
Our gear is paid off, we both work from home - so no gear costs and no rent.

I spent about 7% of sales on marketing (that is web, all advertising, all samples, bridal shows, promotions, etc). Perhaps you don't spend a dime on this stuff.

I assume you give customers a receipt - so you spend something on office supplies.

I realize not everyone has the same expenses or amount of expenses i have. But as you can plainly see I"m not renting a 5000 sf studio and paying a staff of 3 - I think, from what you've said, our expense items should be similar in what they are if not in the dollar amount.

I have a check scanning system for sports league checks and a CC machine - costs for a year of $900 perhaps that you may not have. fine. But if I lost that cost I'd still be nowhere near able to be profitable on 35/hour.

perhaps you could list your expense items and a total for the year? rounded to the nearest 100. I'm not asking you to divulge state secrets - or do something I've not already done.

I can only conclude you've something to hide. Show me I'm wrong.
 
The best way to promote your work is to represent your work in a competitive way. All the flags, bells, whistles and really attractive or TVQ recognizable subjects that clients expect to see in professional sports work.

Shooting matches at legitimate events and getting to use the resultant images screams win win. If you are really good at shooting tennis (or whatever sport) it shouldn't take more than six hours of your time and you have solved your credibility problem. You get viable subjects and all the set dressing for nothing but your time. If you could have afforded pro tennis capable models and a court with all the decorations and a crowd to generate high end test photos for your portfolio you would have. You did not. It's a good deal.

In all businesses there is such a thing as servicing the brand.
 
while the original article has been eased off a bit, what many seem to be missing is while it's a great op to get experience - WHAT are you getting the experience for?
A paying job, right?

Well, if they replace paying jobs with 'experience' there's little point to getting the experience and building a portfolio beyond hobby/bucket list/bragging rights.

Depends on your perspective - as a hobbyist this is seen as great news. But as a professional who makes his living being paid for photography I see this as just another step down the path to elimination of my profession.

And I find rather unsettling to see so many revel in the death of a profession and people losing their jobs so what, they can play more with their cameras?

--
Don't seek advice from someone who is not where you want to be - CJ Lewis
My opinions are my own and not those of DPR or its administration. They carry no 'special' value
 
Last edited:
while the original article has been eased off a bit, what many seem to be missing is while it's a great op to get experience - WHAT are you getting the experience for?
A paying job, right?

Well, if they replace paying jobs with 'experience' there's little point to getting the experience and building a portfolio beyond hobby/bucket list/bragging rights.

Depends on your perspective - as a hobbyist this is seen as great news. But as a professional who makes his living being paid for photography I see this as just another step down the path to elimination of my profession.

And I find rather unsettling to see so many revel in the death of a profession and people losing their jobs so what, they can play more with their cameras?

--
Don't seek advice from someone who is not where you want to be - CJ Lewis
My opinions are my own and not those of DPR or its administration. They carry no 'special' value
As part of their school curriculum, kids here in Oz take on work experience in their last year at high school/college and spend a couple of weeks working alongside adults who are experienced in a variety of different vocations. I've taken on two, a few years back, who wanted to be aspiring photographers - what's wrong with that? I completed a report on how they went during the 2 weeks and have never seen them again.

Apprentices abound in all manner of professions - we all have to start somewhere. Those with ability and a good business sense will succeed while others will continue to struggle and/or ultimately fail.

If they eventually become a threat to me then so be it - I'll just have to try that little bit harder but somehow I know that the way I conduct my business will make it harder for them because I do my best at all times with passion.

You surely can't begrudge them for having a go or Tennis Australia for giving them a foot in the door to see what's on the other side.

Zoooming
 
As part of their school curriculum, kids here in Oz take on work experience in their last year at high school/college and spend a couple of weeks working alongside adults who are experienced in a variety of different vocations. I've taken on two, a few years back, who wanted to be aspiring photographers - what's wrong with that? I completed a report on how they went during the 2 weeks and have never seen them again.

Apprentices abound in all manner of professions - we all have to start somewhere. Those with ability and a good business sense will succeed while others will continue to struggle and/or ultimately fail.

If they eventually become a threat to me then so be it - I'll just have to try that little bit harder but somehow I know that the way I conduct my business will make it harder for them because I do my best at all times with passion.

You surely can't begrudge them for having a go or Tennis Australia for giving them a foot in the door to see what's on the other side.

Zoooming
Thank you.
 
To PenguinPhotoCO ( WITHOUT MOD HAT ON)

I am not a PRO, just enjoy photography as a hobby, I take nothing for anyone other than myself. I visit this Forum, purely for the pleasure of others discussion and views

I do find your stance strange

My stance is I am a plumber, I get paid for work, if there is no work I do not get paid, If I work 40 hours a week for 48 weeks a year, then my profit is my wage, about US$25K a year (after tax)

I do not go out, and say I have to make 35k this year, so divide my ten jobs that year and charge 3.5k plus 5 weeks expenses a job, If I do not have work that week then tough on me

I also do not add the cost of my tools, every job or every year, I have had them for the past 40years with the odd modern replacement claimed for

Quote Penguin. So sure, open a photog biz and pay yourself less - but deliver FULL QUALITY and charge FULL PRICE. And no, $15-20 an hour is not full price. It is not a price a photography business can charge and make a profit.

Simple math: there are 2000 work hours in a year. If you COULD fill all 2000 with paying clients at $25/hour you'd have $50,000 in sales. From that comes expenses and taxes. And you'd work another 500 plus hours doing things you can't charge customers for, like education, accoutning, cleaning, equip mtce, software updates, backups, etc.

Working part time the numbers are even worse.
And if you want we can talk about how consumer/retail photographer is seasonal so there is much of the year you won't come close to getting a full week's work.
END QUOTE

I can not charge someone in April for what I expect I will not get in September

Your ethic should be I need a profit of us$52k a year, therefore I need at least 52 weddings at us$1k plus expenses, Not one a month at us$4k plus the months expenses

IMHO

Regards Jack McH
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top