>>> Street Photography eXchange #71 <<<

081dbf864f914211aec63d54bb9393d1.jpg

-gerald

500px / Gerald Gay / Photos
 

Attachments

  • 2743836.jpg
    2743836.jpg
    511.7 KB · Views: 0
pretty adorable. nice find.

i don't really understand the choice to frame in so closely--i would prefer not to decapitate the figure in the bg; to let in a bit more of the case in the window, which makes a nice counterpoint to the bag; and to show enough of the bike under the bag to be visually unambiguous.

but the dog is expressive, and it is an interesting trend, how many people these days carry their pets around.
My intantaneous reaction was like yours. So, since I had a prime on, I went back a few steps and shot a second wider shot and make a choice later.

There are two problems with a wider framing
  • things are not set up optimally for either vertical or horizontal framing --if it were an arranged shot, we could solve that, but not on the street.
  • the dog's head is small, but it is the artistic heart of the image. Making it to small would reduce our identification with, and sympathy for the dog. It would be more of a graphic object.
So the closer shot had more impact. Deciding on the framing was a delicate balancing act of where to cut, and what to include, to give the head the most impact and harmony. I'm pretty happy with the result, but I know it is far from perfect. I think it gets across of the idea of this cute little dog, zipped up in a bag, next to, but outside of the bright lights of a store, and isolated on the desert street at night, which is the epitome of islands of sociability in a desert of vacant loneliness. He sits there, in all his cuteness, alone, seeking comfort, and eager to give us comfort in return.
 
[No message]
 
Still, if you feel called on to do this kind of photography, please do so without shame. Remember that failure is the price of success. It sounds like my desire to do night shots. Years of lousy and disappointing pictures to me, until I learned how to make them work. Nothing taught me anything but all my failures. Likewise, someday I will be able to make better contre jour shots. Right now, I'm doing the essential --learning what does not work so well.

And please, don't hesitate to share your failures with us, so we can learn too, and maybe even fail together, but with mutual love, and mutual growth as photographers.

All the best.
 
this one has gorgeous texture and atmosphere. i could wish that the face fell in the zone of sharper bits, but not sure it would matter much.
It would matter. ;)
 
I like the red, white, and blue columns.

Might have more space at the top of the frame than it needs-not sure.
Thank you!

I wanted to keep intact the line of lamps on the wall of the building - any crop at the top would disconnect this line and the leftest white lit vertical strip of the wall. Probably I would expand this shot up to the square proportions - if it was possible :)
 
[No message]
 
Sweet subject :). I like the result of your b/w PP.
Coming from the master of BW highlights, that's a real compliment.
2013-November-03-2013-DSC_4617-Left-outside-the-shop_.jpg


The bokeh and flare control of the 50/1.8G is on display here.

--
Frank
shot in downtown Manhattan.
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
Always view all photos in Gallery or Original Size


--
Frank
shot in downtown Manhattan.
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
Always view all photos in Gallery or Original Size
 
Have you thought of cropping the figure on the left completely, leaving the shadow only?
but i think that cropping partly gives a more explanation to the shadow.

36e72062c0af4400bf539dda704ca5e8.jpg

thanks. very good.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that beggars and homeless people are so over-shot and ubiquitous and easy to shoot because they are static, and often performing, that one should accept severe demerits just for choosing them as a subject. An alarm should go off.

Just like performers, and sexy women, one should demand of oneself something extra or exceptional to consider them of interest. There should be a high hurdle to jump over.

I think the center triangle might qualify, if cropped as a square. But that would be a very radical crop.



--
Frank
shot in downtown Manhattan.
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
Always view all photos in Gallery or Original Size
 
This picture brings me great joy. The left 20% is exceptional. The empty area on the bottom right weakens it a bit, but the brown nicely matches the color of the boy's shirt.

Nicely done.
 
2013-November-03-2013-_DSC4539-dog-and-bear-in-WashSq_.jpg


Capitalist class inequality - Washington Square

--
Frank
shot in downtown Manhattan.
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
Always view all photos in Gallery or Original Size
 
Have you thought of cropping the figure on the left completely, leaving the shadow only?
but i think that cropping partly gives a more explanation to the shadow.

36e72062c0af4400bf539dda704ca5e8.jpg

thanks. very good.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that beggars and homeless people are so over-shot and ubiquitous and easy to shoot because they are static, and often performing, that one should accept severe demerits just for choosing them as a subject. An alarm should go off.

Just like performers, and sexy women, one should demand of oneself something extra or exceptional to consider them of interest. There should be a high hurdle to jump over.

I think the center triangle might qualify, if cropped as a square. But that would be a very radical crop.

--
Frank
shot in downtown Manhattan.
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
Always view all photos in Gallery or Original Size
hi Fad

I was waiting for this comment. My answer lies in the title of the picture. The “palm”, not “a beggar’. My interest was the palm of the beggar against the one in the shadow which I think is interesting. The first picture was only a preface to the position of the hand. Generally I too don’t mess with pictures of the poor if there isn’t a justification. If you state not to show people in bad condition this is another story. As I can recall you have defended it in the past with one of your picture [the disable].

Thanks for your comments.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top