Taekwondo

Platanomangu

Active member
Messages
92
Reaction score
26
Location
La vega, DO
hi, im a newbie first time with a DSLR, i just wanted to post my first pictures in A,P,S mode, here my son's practices today, i know they don't look good but just want to take some advice, i don't take any advice personal so feel free



 Christopher
Christopher



acd572adba1f4723a3e4ca689a06afe0.jpg



cf8b7e885b414617bbc502ddbae8a76a.jpg



2656ec2f72e441c3bd4e83ab0bf21d43.jpg



ee208f48880d4601abcb05a19d8d840a.jpg



f712c26b0cdb457b9257a207670229f6.jpg



dcf19a2ec4fd43bfafca83484f9c145e.jpg
 
Initial impression:

1) They look a bit underexposed to me.

2) There is no exif information so I don't know what settings you are using. That makes it difficult to comment further. So I guess my advice would be to repost a couple of shots with the exif metadata included in the files.

Shooting sports is great fun, lots of challenges for you and a good way to participate in your son's activities. I have galleries of sports shots of my grand-kids ranging from T-ball to State High School Championships. They are not all great photos but they are priceless.
 
Initial impression:

1) They look a bit underexposed to me.

2) There is no exif information so I don't know what settings you are using. That makes it difficult to comment further. So I guess my advice would be to repost a couple of shots with the exif metadata included in the files.

Shooting sports is great fun, lots of challenges for you and a good way to participate in your son's activities. I have galleries of sports shots of my grand-kids ranging from T-ball to State High School Championships. They are not all great photos but they are priceless.
i really dont know how to do that, do i have to do it manually?
 
The meta data or exif information is placed in the image file by your camera when you take the photo. The software you use to process/resize your images may be stripping that data out.

Old versions of Photoshop used to do that.

What software are you using to process images?

Did you get software with your camera from Nikon?

A good free viewer/editor software application is FastStone Image Viewer. Basic image editing/resize tools and a great viewer. It will also let you easily view the exif information while viewing your images so you can evaluate what camera settings work and what does not work for a given situation.

The FastStone software will only strip the exif information out of the files if you tell it to.

You are facing a big learning curve but it is all rewarding if you have reasonable expectations. Eventually it will all come together.
 
The meta data or exif information is placed in the image file by your camera when you take the photo. The software you use to process/resize your images may be stripping that data out.

Old versions of Photoshop used to do that.

What software are you using to process images?

Did you get software with your camera from Nikon?

A good free viewer/editor software application is FastStone Image Viewer. Basic image editing/resize tools and a great viewer. It will also let you easily view the exif information while viewing your images so you can evaluate what camera settings work and what does not work for a given situation.

The FastStone software will only strip the exif information out of the files if you tell it to.

You are facing a big learning curve but it is all rewarding if you have reasonable expectations. Eventually it will all come together.
I used nikon viewx2, the original format was raw so I had to converted it yo jpg, I have photoshop cs5 but photoshop was giving me a error on couples picture s
 
Did you upload the pics from your CPU or post them from Photobucket? I know when I post pcs from Photobucket the EXIF info does not show up. When I upload them from my CPU they are there.
 
Did you upload the pics from your CPU or post them from Photobucket? I know when I post pcs from Photobucket the EXIF info does not show up. When I upload them from my CPU they are there.
 
1f29b8e3d2d34d5bb54b1c8aa09d904f.jpg



87bbbf6ef4ce47618c074e711b404232.jpg



ab0e5aa35e3e4a2b8567467e0fc13409.jpg



50f645f5fced4032b906588c95a26c1b.jpg



4419b7c4c38941ad95049b8b8b56227e.jpg



0ff5df65fbc34ad8bd63a35f34575470.jpg





hope the exif are there
 
Last edited:
Well, I can tell you that I shot my kid's test last week in a studio much like the one in your photo and it went like this: ISO8000, f/4.0, 1/500 and I kind of wished I had a 2.8 zoom with me.
 
I don't know what you did different but the exif information is present in this set of images.

shutter speed: 1/250

aperture: f/5.6

ISO: 6400

As I said before, they seem a bit under exposed. More specifically the faces are under exposed. The floor is well exposed. The majority of light in this gym is coming from the ceiling. Not so much reflected from the walls or floor.

Possibly add some exposure compensation in camera to bump the exposure up a bit while using the same mode you used for this set of images. The floor will be a bit overexposed but the faces will be more well exposed.

Another possibility . . .

Put the camera in manual exposure mode and use similar settings to what was used in the images you uploaded here. The images are clear of significant noise at ISO 6400 so I would keep that setting. You don't need an aperture of f/5.6, so if you can, I would open that up as far as possible, (f/3.5?). Take a few shots with shutter speed at 1/200, 1/250 and faster then check the images in the camera's LCD. See if you can get better exposure on the faces. When you find a shutter speed/aperture combination that exposes well for the faces stick with that.

One of the rules for high ISO sports shooting is to expose to the right. That is a reference to the histogram, where the right side of the curve is located up against the right side of the graph frame. That results in some clipping of fully lighted white areas in the image.
 
I don't know what you did different but the exif information is present in this set of images.

shutter speed: 1/250

aperture: f/5.6

ISO: 6400

As I said before, they seem a bit under exposed. More specifically the faces are under exposed. The floor is well exposed. The majority of light in this gym is coming from the ceiling. Not so much reflected from the walls or floor.

Possibly add some exposure compensation in camera to bump the exposure up a bit while using the same mode you used for this set of images. The floor will be a bit overexposed but the faces will be more well exposed.

Another possibility . . .

Put the camera in manual exposure mode and use similar settings to what was used in the images you uploaded here. The images are clear of significant noise at ISO 6400 so I would keep that setting. You don't need an aperture of f/5.6, so if you can, I would open that up as far as possible, (f/3.5?). Take a few shots with shutter speed at 1/200, 1/250 and faster then check the images in the camera's LCD. See if you can get better exposure on the faces. When you find a shutter speed/aperture combination that exposes well for the faces stick with that.

One of the rules for high ISO sports shooting is to expose to the right. That is a reference to the histogram, where the right side of the curve is located up against the right side of the graph frame. That results in some clipping of fully lighted white areas in the image.
thank you soo much, ill keep all that in mind for the next time
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top