No. More like 13.5uberzone wrote:
Yeah but what is that in full frame terms? Only 27 million?YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Micro Four Thirds 54 million
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. More like 13.5uberzone wrote:
Yeah but what is that in full frame terms? Only 27 million?YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Micro Four Thirds 54 million
I could drill down into the segments but Flickr has mirrorless listed as point and shoot and DSLR not their own segment, also it needs to be weighted or broken down as to when cameras were launched etc, maybe someone with more time on their hands....GeorgianBay1939 wrote:
Good stuff!YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Mirrorless images on flickr (approx):
Sony 32 Million images
Panasonic 30 million images
Olympus 24 million images
Nikon 4 million images
Canon 0.7 million
Samsung 0.5 million
can't find Pentax Q
Micro Four Thirds 54 million
Can you put the above in a context?
Like comparing with
It would be even more interesting if the (time) trends of the stats could be determined.
- phones
- P&S
- DSLR
- Other
Thanks
Tom
Micro Four Thirds has 60% of the images taken by mirrorless cameras on Flickr with Sony taken up 31% and Pentax, Nikon, Canon, Fuji etc taking up 9% between them....YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Mirrorless images on flickr (approx):
Sony 32 Million images
Panasonic 30 million images
Olympus 24 million images
Nikon 4 million images
Canon 0.7 million
Samsung 0.5 million
can't find Pentax Q
Micro Four Thirds 54 million
Cipher wrote:
The GF1 seems still quite popular...but they only have the GX1 as the other m43 in the top 10. Very poor showing compared to Olympus. I think this shows that Panasonic really came out with boring bodies (until the GX7). The E-M5 is the top for Olympus and they have eight m43 bodies in the top 10. Quite a difference. But Canon crushes both Olympus and Canon combined.
![]()
Well to give you a rough idea...GeorgianBay1939 wrote:
Good stuff!YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Mirrorless images on flickr (approx):
Sony 32 Million images
Panasonic 30 million images
Olympus 24 million images
Nikon 4 million images
Canon 0.7 million
Samsung 0.5 million
can't find Pentax Q
Micro Four Thirds 54 million
Can you put the above in a context?
Like comparing with
It would be even more interesting if the (time) trends of the stats could be determined.
- phones
- P&S
- DSLR
- Other
Thanks
Tom
Yes who would have thought it? Just about the most expensive P+S also has more people uploading more images to Flickr than any other P+S model.YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Sony RX100 5.3 million images and high activity factor
The best thing to do would be to delete this complete thread.YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Mirrorless images on flickr (approx):
Sony 32 Million images
Panasonic 30 million images
Olympus 24 million images
Nikon 4 million images
Canon 0.7 million
Samsung 0.5 million
can't find Pentax Q
Micro Four Thirds 54 million
Well that is one way of looking at it I suppose.ernstbk wrote:
The best thing to do would be to delete this complete thread.YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Mirrorless images on flickr (approx):
Sony 32 Million images
Panasonic 30 million images
Olympus 24 million images
Nikon 4 million images
Canon 0.7 million
Samsung 0.5 million
can't find Pentax Q
Micro Four Thirds 54 million
I did a bit of searching to find the GH3 in the statics and where I would be able to contact flickr about this. All I found is chaos, and for this reason the statistics published are absolutely worthless. If the GH3 is not found then we have to ask what other cameras are being omitted.
3000 photos taken by 202 members of the group, what about the photos on non-members ?Abrak wrote:
Well that is one way of looking at it I suppose.ernstbk wrote:
The best thing to do would be to delete this complete thread.YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Mirrorless images on flickr (approx):
Sony 32 Million images
Panasonic 30 million images
Olympus 24 million images
Nikon 4 million images
Canon 0.7 million
Samsung 0.5 million
can't find Pentax Q
Micro Four Thirds 54 million
I did a bit of searching to find the GH3 in the statics and where I would be able to contact flickr about this. All I found is chaos, and for this reason the statistics published are absolutely worthless. If the GH3 is not found then we have to ask what other cameras are being omitted.
But as 99% of posts on DPR are based on opinions, I prefer facts that are imperfect rather than no facts at all.
And, of course, there is also the possibility that the Panasonic GH3 Flickr group
http://www.flickr.com/groups/gh3/
With 202 members and 3000 photos is actually too small to register on the grid at all!!
Well all I am saying is that if you go Flickr and search for images from the Panasonic GH3. You then sort the images by 'most recent' all you find is 1 photo that was dated yesterday. The second photo was dated the day before.ernstbk wrote:
3000 photos taken by 202 members of the group, what about the photos on non-members ?Abrak wrote:
With 202 members and 3000 photos is actually too small to register on the grid at all!!
I've been shooting Panasonic for near 6 years and been on Flickr for the same, as I previously pointed that on Flickr stats as far as Panasonic models listings go they they tend to lag behind other manufacturers for some reasons, the GH3 will turn up and with upto date stats....ernstbk wrote:
The best thing to do would be to delete this complete thread.YouDidntDidYou wrote:
Mirrorless images on flickr (approx):
Sony 32 Million images
Panasonic 30 million images
Olympus 24 million images
Nikon 4 million images
Canon 0.7 million
Samsung 0.5 million
can't find Pentax Q
Micro Four Thirds 54 million
I did a bit of searching to find the GH3 in the statics and where I would be able to contact flickr about this. All I found is chaos, and for this reason the statistics published are absolutely worthless. If the GH3 is not found then we have to ask what other cameras are being omitted.
Flickr includes Apple cameras with an average of 1 daily user.... http://www.flickr.com/cameras/appleAbrak wrote:
Well all I am saying is that if you go Flickr and search for images from the Panasonic GH3. You then sort the images by 'most recent' all you find is 1 photo that was dated yesterday. The second photo was dated the day before.ernstbk wrote:
3000 photos taken by 202 members of the group, what about the photos on non-members ?Abrak wrote:
With 202 members and 3000 photos is actually too small to register on the grid at all!!
So, you have to at least entertain the possibility that the GH3 is not included in the statistics because it is not statistically significant.
I doidn't bother but I bet if you look for D7000, D5200, 60D, 650D, you'll see they still beat all or almost all mirrorless.YouDidntDidYou wrote:
The ranking you show is for activity factor not images taken.Olympus and Panasonic compare better in that regard over Canon meaning their users are getting more use and enjoyment out if their cameras (smart phones score highly in images taken, check apple and Samsung).
If you look at Canon and Nikon's stats for images taken their older cameras score highly suggesting their best days are behind them...
Don Karner wrote:
I can't figure the value of this report. I have thousands of images I've taken with a Canon M, and NONE of them are on Flickr.
None of the pictures I've taken with any camera are on Flickr...... Probably thousands of other photographers can say the very same thing.
rhlpetrus wrote:
I doidn't bother but I bet if you look for D7000, D5200, 60D, 650D, you'll see they still beat all or almost all mirrorless.YouDidntDidYou wrote:
The ranking you show is for activity factor not images taken.Olympus and Panasonic compare better in that regard over Canon meaning their users are getting more use and enjoyment out if their cameras (smart phones score highly in images taken, check apple and Samsung).
If you look at Canon and Nikon's stats for images taken their older cameras score highly suggesting their best days are behind them...
Don Karner wrote:
I can't figure the value of this report. I have thousands of images I've taken with a Canon M, and NONE of them are on Flickr.
None of the pictures I've taken with any camera are on Flickr...... Probably thousands of other photographers can say the very same thing.