pany 7-14mm opinions

Anders W wrote:
Jacques Cornell wrote:

Perfect grammar. And commas, even. Son, we just can't have that around here.

;-)
Well, ain't that sweet. Here I'm doin me very best to raise em forum standards and all ye can tell me is to cut it out and level with em hillbillies. ;-)
In contrast to your usual high standards, Anders, you've failed miserably here with your atttempt at American slang. :D

For starters: You're missing the requisite double negative ( ’you ain't got nuttin' ) etc.

Anders W wrote:

Several posts in this thread express a certain ambivalence with regard to the Pany 7-14 on the ground that it is known to give rise to purple flare in certain situations when used on the E-M5 (or other Oly bodies). It might therefore be worth pointing out that a solution to this problem exists and that there is consequently little reason to abstain from the 7-14 on such grounds if it is found desirable on others. See here for details:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51390321

On top of eliminating the purple flare, the solution also provides a general option to use filters with the 7-14 in spite of the fact that the lens does not take ordinary screw-in filters up front.

Apart from eliminating the purple flare, the solution has the additional advantage of simultaneously reducing the residual CA that may appear whenever a Pany lens (not only the 7-14) is used on an Oly body and which remains even after ordinary software-correction for lateral CA has been carried out in PP. See this thread for details:

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51600715
--
jacquescornell.com
"No matter where you go, there you are."
 
Like in this shot of the Pope's altar in St. Peter's Basilica, where a pano shot just wasn't practical.





The 7-14 is an excellent, and you'll enjoy the image quality of this lens a lot longer than you'll fret over spending so much. I haven't regretted it for a second.

--
-------------------------------------------------
No Signature.
 

Attachments

  • 2718386.jpg
    2718386.jpg
    898.9 KB · Views: 0
Jacques Cornell wrote:
DaveEM1 wrote:

I am very close in deciding the 7-14mm. What are your opinions of this lens for those that own it. I also welcome those that

do not own it. I love how you can capture a wide area in one shot. I thought about doing panorama stitching but the effect is different.

Thanks
Optical performance is excellent, even wide-open.

I find it interesting that I use the 7-14 on MFT far more than I used my 17-40 on Canon FF, even when shooting similar subject matter. Not sure why that is. I hesitated to plunk down $900 on a lens I wasn't sure I'd use much, but I'm really glad to have the 7-14 as part of my 3-zoom travel & landscape kit.
Funny, I thought the same thing. I sold all my Canon FF gear to move to m4/3, and have found that the Canon 17-40 is no match for the 7-14. It's a better lens in nearly every respect.
 
DaveEM1 wrote:

I also welcome those that do not own it. I love how you can capture a wide area in one shot. I thought about doing panorama stitching but the effect is different.
But it's a low priority. It is definitely a "want" rather than a "need". My current widest lens is the Olympus 12mm f/2 and it is wide enough for most of my needs. Pano stitching does look different in terms of capturing a wide area, but subjectively I prefer it. For me, ultrawides are more about playing with perspective than capturing a wide scene.
 
Thanks for your nice words, MikeGre. Yes, Pany 7-14 is insanely sharp. Photography is just a hobby for me, so I have not got chance to try "professional" lenses like Zeiss 15mm or Canon 17mm. However, among all the lenses I have owned, Pany 7-14 and Canon 70-200 F4 IS are the most impressive ones.
 
The 7-14mm is arriving tomorrow. Now i wait for the EM1.

I think capturing a very wide area has a creative feel and gets more 'story' in the photo. If i want to capture a lot of area when confined in a room this will be great. The video recording is very smooth because of the wide angle. It almost looks like a machine is moving the camera and no shake. I saw a sample video on youtube.

I am getting the oly 17mm f1.8 and 60mm macro. I dont expect much telephoto while in europe. I could add the oly 40-150mm 4-5.6 in case
 
Used the panny 7-14 on GF1, GH2, GX1 and yesterday, first lens on a brand new GX7.

To me: an indispensable UWA lens for inside architectural work, landscapes and other special perspective situations.

Some shots taken yesterday (@ 7 and 14mm) are at

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3558939

T
 
Indeed no shame needed. Great shots!
Abrak wrote:

This does seem a shameless opportunity to post some of my favorite shots with this lens over the past year....

7f6ee35730b64864ab348f5fbe5cef62.jpg

d7e2b8aef64e4d8fa040cb46be6b9f6e.jpg

1ebbe5d81aa24f1884d103edeb7b1992.jpg

6c99b1aa5827466c8a2ca86634b1fa2b.jpg

0228fd5ed1284f8fac113c96970bfc05.jpg

b69467f1ea8f4c039cf9790b896c03a8.jpg
 
DaveEM1 wrote:

The 7-14mm is arriving tomorrow. Now i wait for the EM1.

I think capturing a very wide area has a creative feel and gets more 'story' in the photo. If i want to capture a lot of area when confined in a room this will be great. The video recording is very smooth because of the wide angle. It almost looks like a machine is moving the camera and no shake. I saw a sample video on youtube.

I am getting the oly 17mm f1.8 and 60mm macro. I dont expect much telephoto while in europe. I could add the oly 40-150mm 4-5.6 in case
I have an EM5 with 7-14, 12-35, 40-150 and 60 macro. I assumed that the 12-35 would be my walk around lens but it turns out that I love the ultra wide perspective so much that the 7-14 acounts for about 70% of my shots. The 40-150 is fine for my limited telephoto needs and I have had some reasonable results with the EM5 digital teleconverter. The maco lens is not talked about much on these forums but is a fine prime in its own right - perhaps as good as the much vaunted 75mm. I can carry all this kit on a belt with the camera around my neck!
 
Wow! This lens is no 1 on my list, and I am sure it will produce images just as good for me as these and Tom's. What a minute, the photographer has something to do with it.......

F.
 
Last edited:
I've had the 7-14mm for about two years and love it. My primary camera is an Oly OM-D E-M5 and the two lenses I use most are the 7-14 and the Pany 12-35mm. I've not done any formal testing of the lens but I love the images it produces. I tend to use it at its limit for artistic purposes so I'm not worried at distortion





1e5f0d20a2e64493bc8f6d625801b0c5.jpg



b53f9b0372d24a5b88dbce252ae870c9.jpg








3bdbcac1fef941448d9e31f5f011aaa7.jpg



a09c33d3c4304ac098c2b7425557489e.jpg



4f651a2eaed04291b95ea8ff74c46fd4.jpg



c741df7e25ab435fbd005e8218d43c6e.jpg



. I've posted a few images.
 
All of the images I attached were shot between 7 and 9mm. They have all been processed in LR5 with distortion removed via auto corrected lens profile feature.
 
Thanks. If you are asking about the image of the older couple, it was shot in Antwerp this past July. The other shots are from Berlin, Cologne, etc.
 
Yes, a beautiful P1800 but shot in Copenhagen.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top