Member said:
Wormsmeat wrote:
Just beautiful.
Member said:
RealPancho wrote:
Truly outstanding. What PP did you apply?
Thanks to both of you. Here's a long answer to RealPancho:
I went to pick up my wife at a friend's house, and the friend's daughter was out front swinging on this rope swing. The scene looked great and the light looked great and I got out and asked if I could take some photos. I only had the 20mm lens. I quickly changed settings for a moving subject, and took some shots. I'm a beginner still working at just becoming technically competent, much less artistically interesting, and I had trouble with these shots. I had AF set to small area, and between that and the 20mm lens (perhaps the first time I've wished for faster AF with that lens), I was having difficulty getting my subject in focus. I just wasn't quick thinking enough to manually zone focus or otherwise adjust my camera to take these shots.
So, the one I posted is my favorite composition of the ones I shot, but the girl was not quite in focus (the
background was in focus, if you look at the image 100%). So the PP was intended to make the most out of an image that was not in focus. I initially processed it in LR, adjusting exposure, highlights, shadows, then exported to NIK Silver Efx (which I recently obtained and am still trying to figure out), where I think I used a high contrast setting then bumped up the silver tone effect; then opened in Photoshop, where I used a glow technique that someone here (Bob Tullis?) posted: (1) duplicate layer; (2) change layer mode to "overlay"'; (3) use gaussian blur on the duplicate layer; (4) adjust the opacity to about 40%; (5) flatten layers.
So the extensive PP on this image was mainly to compensate for the technical failings of my photograph.
Here's one where I managed to capture my subject in reasonably good focus, and did not PP to the same extreme extent: