Mitch Connor
Active member
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/05/27/MN29482.DTL&type=news
I'd like to get a handholdable 300mm or higher lens so I was curious to see which lens the photographer used on this bird shot. I didn't expect to get all this information by right-clicking on the inage and clicking Properties (after downloading the jpg and opening with ACDSee). Is this usual for a newspaper photo?
Anyway, it seems a good way to get some insight.
1/3200 sec. suprised me.
I'd have been pleased/surprised to see that the 100-400L had been used since that's the lens that I'm thinking of getting (instead of the 300 2.8 with 1.4X TC the photojournalist used or the 400mm DO).
Maybe 6 lbs. without a TC for the 300 2.8 isn't that handholdable. Decisions, decisions.
I'd like to get a handholdable 300mm or higher lens so I was curious to see which lens the photographer used on this bird shot. I didn't expect to get all this information by right-clicking on the inage and clicking Properties (after downloading the jpg and opening with ACDSee). Is this usual for a newspaper photo?
Anyway, it seems a good way to get some insight.
1/3200 sec. suprised me.
I'd have been pleased/surprised to see that the 100-400L had been used since that's the lens that I'm thinking of getting (instead of the 300 2.8 with 1.4X TC the photojournalist used or the 400mm DO).
Maybe 6 lbs. without a TC for the 300 2.8 isn't that handholdable. Decisions, decisions.