Why do most posters say "M43"?

Any thing made small is now called micro concentrated washing powder. :)
 
Barry Stewart wrote:
tkbslc wrote:

And I am too lazy (and frankly just don't care enough) to pull up character map or memorize ascii hotkeys to satisfy the more pedantic members of our forum! :)

Sometimes I also forget to capitalize canon and nikon, too.
If you can do Shift-m for a capital M, you can do a alt(option)-m for a µ
Now you made me look it up. alt-m doesn't do that on my Windows 7 computer. I have to type alt+0181 to get a µ symbol and I'm going to forget that in about 10 minutes.

How about you just read my m's as µ's? That's a lot easier for me. And as I mentioned above, I really don't care. People know what m43 means and that is good enough for me.
 
We aren't talking digits or measurements, we are talking about a name. It's the same reason that we use MS for Microsoft and not µs. Olympus did not use the name because the number .000001333 means anything to the system.
 
Last edited:
Tim A2 wrote:

I have seen it as 2.0 in or even 2 in , but never 2.0in or 2.0inches or even 2.0 inches for that matter.
Well, that is because 'mm' is a metric thing. Just as you would never see 2.0in, you would never see 2.0 " because 2.0" is prettier. I agree 35mm is good. Sometimes there is a '.' after 'in' for 'in.'. Haven't ever seen 'mm.'.
... besides what difference once you get past 1.97 in or should that be 1.97in?
And this depends on how far you want to throw the lens. If it is going to be thrown to a receiver on a 12 yard down and out, then 1/100 of a degree doesn't matter. If the lens is launched toward the sun, then greater precision might be good.

However, if you aim for the receiver with a measured resolution of 1.97 degrees, simply dubbing it 1.968503937007874 degrees for the trip to the sun introduces as much uncertainty as accuracy.

Yeah, one is a measurement of length and the other arc. Just trying to make a point... Mixed metaphors got nothing on me :^|
 
It gets messier still. Hyphenated words are used for things like Fresnell-type lens. Maybe...

Commas are sometimes used for multiple adjectives describing a thing. 'Big, red dog' is different from 'Big Red dog'. 'Big-red dog' is just wrong.

So, would we follow the 'big,red' paradigm for have '50,mm lens' or the hyphen thing. I admit I have seen 50-mm...
Tim A2 wrote:
Joel Halbert wrote:
...recommended practice to hyphenate two adjectives when they act together to modify the noun. So, if one were to insist on separating "50 mm" with a space, then one would also be obligated to write "50-mm lens", ...
Well there you go. I did not know the mm was an adjetive. I concede. You win
 
SterlingBjorndahl wrote:

...I've got pages of college notes where I used μ as a general abbreviation for 'micro', not meaning "millionths". I know I'm not the only one.
I use a circle with a punct in the middle for 'around'. Depending on context, it may also mean 'about' but I mostly use ~ for 'about'.

According to Dan Brown, I misuse the circle/punct symbol.

I don't care.

- - - - Speaking of Dan, I wonder what Dr./DR/Dr Langdon could make of this thread...
 
Last edited:
Tan68 wrote:

It gets messier still. Hyphenated words are used for things like Fresnell-type lens. Maybe...

Commas are sometimes used for multiple adjectives describing a thing. 'Big, red dog' is different from 'Big Red dog'. 'Big-red dog' is just wrong.
Note I mentioned "when they act together to modify the noun". Big and red are independent adjectives, thus no hyphen. "Big-toothed dog" should get the hyphen.
So, would we follow the 'big,red' paradigm for have '50,mm lens' or the hyphen thing. I admit I have seen 50-mm...
Tim A2 wrote:
Joel Halbert wrote:

...recommended practice to hyphenate two adjectives when they act together to modify the noun. So, if one were to insist on separating "50 mm" with a space, then one would also be obligated to write "50-mm lens", ...
Well there you go. I did not know the mm was an adjetive. I concede. You win
--

JoelH
 
Joel Halbert wrote:
Tan68 wrote:

...
Note I mentioned "when they act together to modify the noun". Big and red are independent adjectives, thus no hyphen. "Big-toothed dog" should get the hyphen.
I see and do use hyphens that way as well.

'big-toothed' is very different from 'big, toothed'

Big-red could mean over saturated...
 
Last edited:
Tan68 wrote:
Joel Halbert wrote:
Tan68 wrote:

...
Note I mentioned "when they act together to modify the noun". Big and red are independent adjectives, thus no hyphen. "Big-toothed dog" should get the hyphen.
I see and do use hyphens that way as well.

'big-toothed' is very different from 'big, toothed'

Big-red could mean over saturated...
I am just happy to see something worthwhile discussed in this thread. I never had to think about it, because the style guides said add a space between the number and the unit, so that was that. I have seen style guides in non-technical areasthat said to omit the space.

tim
 
Tan68 wrote:
Tim A2 wrote:

I have seen it as 2.0 in or even 2 in , but never 2.0in or 2.0inches or even 2.0 inches for that matter.
Well, that is because 'mm' is a metric thing. Just as you would never see 2.0in, you would never see 2.0 " because 2.0" is prettier. I agree 35mm is good. Sometimes there is a '.' after 'in' for 'in.'. Haven't ever seen 'mm.'.
... besides what difference once you get past 1.97 in or should that be 1.97in?
And this depends on how far you want to throw the lens. If it is going to be thrown to a receiver on a 12 yard down and out, then 1/100 of a degree doesn't matter. If the lens is launched toward the sun, then greater precision might be good.

However, if you aim for the receiver with a measured resolution of 1.97 degrees, simply dubbing it 1.968503937007874 degrees for the trip to the sun introduces as much uncertainty as accuracy.

Yeah, one is a measurement of length and the other arc. Just trying to make a point... Mixed metaphors got nothing on me :^|
I'll bet those good Leica lenses are made with such precision that you need all those digits to be accurate. A 50 mm Canon, Nikon, etc, you could probably get by with "about 50 mm or so". But if I had to pick one to throw or launch it probably wouldn''t be the Leica.

tim
 
Joel Halbert wrote:
Marty4650 wrote:

The "Micro" in Micro Four Thirds just means a "smaller camera based on a 4/3 sensor.'
Therefore, the whole notion that "µ" is more correct than "M" is based on the incorrect premise that we are discussing some engineering unit of measure.
Quite.

Maybe someone should start a post arguing that we should really be calling the system:

μίκρος τέτταρες τρεῖς
 
xpatUSA wrote:

While realizing it's too late for μ4/3" or even u43 to be generally acceptable, one can but dream . . . ;-)
So, what do people say this in the rest of the world?

I'm a scientist, µ means 10^-6, as in 1µL is 1/1000 of a mL which is 1/1000 of a liter. µ43 does not make any sense to me. 10^-6 of what?
 
Alexis D wrote:

Because we are sick of awkward to type names like OM-D, E-M5, Micro Four Thirds, E-PL5, E-P5 ... ...
That, I absolutely agree. Olympus has the worse model names. If you look at the thread titles here, people already spelled E-M1 in many different ways.
 
SDPharm wrote:

I'm a scientist, µ means 10^-6, as in 1µL is 1/1000 of a mL which is 1/1000 of a liter. µ43 does not make any sense to me. 10^-6 of what?
What, that's the ONLY thing the word 'micro' means, is an SI prefix?

We're not talking about refereed publication here. We're talking about vernacular abbreviations. I've used the letter µ to abbreviate a lot of instances of the word (or prefex) "micro", when writing informally.

To say that µ "means" 10^6 is an oversimplification. It's shorthand for the word/prefix "micro" too.

Sterling
--
Lens Grit
 
Tan68 wrote:

- - - - Speaking of Dan, I wonder what Dr./DR/Dr Langdon could make of this thread...
That gives me an idea for a book! I call dibs on the copyright! :)
 
MAubrey wrote:
Joel Halbert wrote:
Marty4650 wrote:

The "Micro" in Micro Four Thirds just means a "smaller camera based on a 4/3 sensor.'
Therefore, the whole notion that "µ" is more correct than "M" is based on the incorrect premise that we are discussing some engineering unit of measure.
Quite.

Maybe someone should start a post arguing that we should really be calling the system:

μίκρος τέτταρες τρεῖς
 
SterlingBjorndahl wrote:
SDPharm wrote:

I'm a scientist, µ means 10^-6, as in 1µL is 1/1000 of a mL which is 1/1000 of a liter. µ43 does not make any sense to me. 10^-6 of what?
What, that's the ONLY thing the word 'micro' means, is an SI prefix?

We're not talking about refereed publication here. We're talking about vernacular abbreviations. I've used the letter µ to abbreviate a lot of instances of the word (or prefex) "micro", when writing informally.

To say that µ "means" 10^6 is an oversimplification. It's shorthand for the word/prefix "micro" too.
You need to read his post again, this time carefully - before responding.
 
I don't know how to generate a "μ"...I only got that one and the one in the subject by copying and pasting from your post!

Some people type a "u" instead.

That doesn't bother me compared to teh mis-use of the term "crop factor" referring to ANY sensor smaller than the misnamed " full frame"! It's multiplication factor, NOT crop factor!
 
Gidday Mike

It's one of those symbol characters that I have engraved in my frontal lobes somewhere.

µ = Alt+0181

Besides µ = Mu, therefore MFT is more or less correct, according to the nomenclature used by Olympus and Panasonic, et. al.

° = Alt+0176

é = Alt+0233

± = Alt+0177

² = Alt+0178

³ = Alt+0179

etc ... Don't type the "+" sign; keep the "Alt" key depressed while typing in the numbers ... ;-)

--
Regards, john from Melbourne, Australia.
(see profile for current gear)
Please do not embed images from my web site without prior permission
I consider this to be a breach of my copyright.
-- -- --
.
The Camera doth not make the Man (nor Woman) ...
Perhaps being kind to cats, dogs & children does ...
.
I am a Photography Aficionado ... and ...
"I don't have any problems with John. He is a crotchety old Aussie. He will smack you if you behave like a {deleted}. Goes with the territory." boggis the cat
.
Gallery: http://canopuscomputing.com.au/gallery2/v/main-page/



C120644_small.jpg




Bird Control Officers on active service.
 
Mike_PEAT wrote:

I don't know how to generate a "μ"...I only got that one and the one in the subject by copying and pasting from your post!
I suspect it would be a pain on a smart phone or Pad, with limited keys.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top