J
JamesD2
Guest
On a cool evening, Lin and I walked down to the estuary.
View attachment 5510
--
JamesD
Happy Snappin'
View attachment 5510
--
JamesD
Happy Snappin'
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Robert, a lovely shot. Love the older ivy-covered buildings in your country. Bear in mind, it's Lin who now possesses the Sony RX100. Mine is sold and all I have to show for it is an entry-level Nikon with kit lens. I traded downwards in order to soothe my troubled spirit as it were. Evidently my lack of patience is revealing itself, eh?! hahaMember said:Sir Corey of Deane wrote:
I had no trouble uploading this pic to my gallery.........let's see if it will post. It's nothing special and a subject I wouldn't normally waste film on but I like it and shows the advantage of digital photography where one can snap away without regard to cost.
James, I'm going to stick my neck out and suggest that the Sony RX100 couldn't do any better than this £70 Fuji under the circumstances this photo was taken and I'm pretty sure you wont quarrel with the colour. Just a little cropping and mild sharpening whose artifacts you can see if you view 100%!
Anyway, you take five - I'm a bit like you in that my patience tends to wear a little thin with some of this modern technology.
Posted straight away!
hmmmmm......JamesD2 wrote:
The sun came out briefly so I turned the camera in the opposite direction.
--
JamesD
Happy Snappin'
JamesD2 wrote:
The truth is, Charlie, they both lack punch and I'm not going to add punch for the sake of adding it. Oh ... don't get me wrong. I'm not against using software to improve the image (a bit anyway). After all, that's what was formerly done in the darkroom. But I need to get closer to "getting it right" in the camera and I'm not there yet by a country mile. I need to go into the settings and make some changes. And the fact is, while the kit lens is "okay", it's not exactly the best piece of glass. It's certainly not what was on the Sony RX100. I don't believe in pixel peeping so I'm not about to blow either image up beyond what you see. The sharpness is "okay" (nothing exciting there) but the contrast and saturation could stand a boost. Then there is the thing called composition. I need to start thinking "outside the box".