Unbelievable... DavidP to be banned...

Doug Walker said:

Either koalafarm or KiranP complained to Phil about DavidP's post
about his Epson 2200. Phil even went so far as threantening to ban
DavidP unless he behaves and then moved his post to the "Open
forum" forum!!
Unbelievable!! Neither koalafarm or KiranP have contributed
anything of value to this forum except their requirements to censor
the subject line and/or the content of every post on this forum.
How dare they!! How is it that the anal rentative types have any
control over this forum. I advise all to boycott all post from
these two control freaks.
DavidP, you are a learning process, keep posting!
I have sent a complaint about koalafarm and kiranp to phil. I
encourage all that feel the same to email Phil as well.
Don't let this forum be controlled by those that wish to censor
this forum. Please send an email to Phil expressing your feelings.
--
Doug Walker
Check my profile for equipment list.

Click to expand...

Doug Walker said:

Either koalafarm or KiranP complained to Phil about DavidP's post
about his Epson 2200. Phil even went so far as threantening to ban
DavidP unless he behaves and then moved his post to the "Open
forum" forum!!
Unbelievable!! Neither koalafarm or KiranP have contributed
anything of value to this forum except their requirements to censor
the subject line and/or the content of every post on this forum.
How dare they!! How is it that the anal rentative types have any
control over this forum. I advise all to boycott all post from
these two control freaks.
DavidP, you are a learning process, keep posting!
I have sent a complaint about koalafarm and kiranp to phil. I
encourage all that feel the same to email Phil as well.
Don't let this forum be controlled by those that wish to censor
this forum. Please send an email to Phil expressing your feelings.
--
Doug Walker
Check my profile for equipment list.

Click to expand...

Doug Walker said:

Either koalafarm or KiranP complained to Phil about DavidP's post
about his Epson 2200. Phil even went so far as threantening to ban
DavidP unless he behaves and then moved his post to the "Open
forum" forum!!
Unbelievable!! Neither koalafarm or KiranP have contributed
anything of value to this forum except their requirements to censor
the subject line and/or the content of every post on this forum.
How dare they!! How is it that the anal rentative types have any
control over this forum. I advise all to boycott all post from
these two control freaks.
DavidP, you are a learning process, keep posting!
I have sent a complaint about koalafarm and kiranp to phil. I
encourage all that feel the same to email Phil as well.
Don't let this forum be controlled by those that wish to censor
this forum. Please send an email to Phil expressing your feelings.
--
Doug Walker
Check my profile for equipment list.

Click to expand...

Doug Walker said:

Either koalafarm or KiranP complained to Phil about DavidP's post
about his Epson 2200. Phil even went so far as threantening to ban
DavidP unless he behaves and then moved his post to the "Open
forum" forum!!
Unbelievable!! Neither koalafarm or KiranP have contributed
anything of value to this forum except their requirements to censor
the subject line and/or the content of every post on this forum.
How dare they!! How is it that the anal rentative types have any
control over this forum. I advise all to boycott all post from
these two control freaks.
DavidP, you are a learning process, keep posting!
I have sent a complaint about koalafarm and kiranp to phil. I
encourage all that feel the same to email Phil as well.
Don't let this forum be controlled by those that wish to censor
this forum. Please send an email to Phil expressing your feelings.
--
Doug Walker
Check my profile for equipment list.

Click to expand...

Doug Walker said:

http://www.pbase.com/mankman
Canon EOS 10D

Equipment list in profile...subject to change on a daily basis ;^)

Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and
it holds the universe together

Click to expand...

Doug Walker said:

Either koalafarm or KiranP complained to Phil about DavidP's post
about his Epson 2200. Phil even went so far as threantening to ban
DavidP unless he behaves and then moved his post to the "Open
forum" forum!!
Unbelievable!! Neither koalafarm or KiranP have contributed
anything of value to this forum except their requirements to censor
the subject line and/or the content of every post on this forum.
How dare they!! How is it that the anal rentative types have any
control over this forum. I advise all to boycott all post from
these two control freaks.
DavidP, you are a learning process, keep posting!
I have sent a complaint about koalafarm and kiranp to phil. I
encourage all that feel the same to email Phil as well.
Don't let this forum be controlled by those that wish to censor
this forum. Please send an email to Phil expressing your feelings.
--
Doug Walker
Check my profile for equipment list.

Click to expand...

Kiran P said:

First of all, I never spoke to Phil at all. Second of all, I
wasn't even trying to get the post moved. All I asked is that
threads should have appropriate titles so that we can decide if its
something we want to read or not, as opposed to just having to
click on it cause we didn't know what it was about at all.
Thirdly, I have actually been quite helpful. Just a couple of days
ago I helped fill someone in about white balance issues. Even
though many people wrote 2 cents, I went to the trouble to outline
the differences between AWB, presets, manual, and using the temp.
scale. And that was jsut a few days ago, never mind the number of
times I've really helped way before that.

I don't want David banned at all so please stop your witch hunt.
Clicking on some of these threads is like opening up a book without
reading the title. Would it be great if all the thread titles just
started with a number... as in Theard 20324, then 20325 and so on?
Cause that is what its like sometimes when people don't take the 10
seconds to think of a thoughtful title.

Tell you what, if my idea was so bad, start posting messages with
wacky thread titles and see how many other people you pi$$ off,
cause I can assure you, its not just me, and my intentions were
only to help the greatest number of people here. Cause you know,
we do have lots of people here now. Its not just you anymore, who
may be part of the in group that gets to decide how things are run.

Now I'm curious. Exactly what did you say to Phil? "Ban this guy
cause he's trying to take the forum over by just asking people to
post an appropriate title?" Whatever happened to Phil knows best,
its his forum. Looks like he moved David's thread and everything
else remains intact. So exactly who was in the wrong here buddy?
(and just incase anyone asks, I didn't even think david was in teh
wrong. all i wanted was a move to better thread titles)

I do have to commend you on your title though. It was very
accurate and descriptive. Looks like my suggestions are helping.

Kiran

Click to expand...

smoody said:

It's easy to critisize when you're not the one managing this forum.
I know that if I were him, I would have pulled the plug on this
group already. I don't see why it's such a big deal to follow his
simple rules. It's not as if he's telling anyone they can't talk
about printers at all. It's just that he's provided a link to
click on before you do. Pretty simple.

The problem is that this community has momentum and people like not
only to know they've been heard almost immediately after posting,
but also that they can expect to get a lot of responses everytime
they do. It's addictive to some people.

Personally, I don't mind printer posts on this forum from
time-to-time because so many people print their 10D images, but, in
general, I try to target the best forum for the job (for me, it's
Canon SLR and Lighting Technique).

Click to expand...

smoody said:

http://www.pbase.com/mankman
Canon EOS 10D

Equipment list in profile...subject to change on a daily basis ;^)

Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and
it holds the universe together

Click to expand...

John Mankos said:

This is actually the first time I can remember that Phil has spoken
on this issue.

smoody said:

It's easy to critisize when you're not the one managing this forum.
I know that if I were him, I would have pulled the plug on this
group already. I don't see why it's such a big deal to follow his
simple rules. It's not as if he's telling anyone they can't talk
about printers at all. It's just that he's provided a link to
click on before you do. Pretty simple.

The problem is that this community has momentum and people like not
only to know they've been heard almost immediately after posting,
but also that they can expect to get a lot of responses everytime
they do. It's addictive to some people.

Personally, I don't mind printer posts on this forum from
time-to-time because so many people print their 10D images, but, in
general, I try to target the best forum for the job (for me, it's
Canon SLR and Lighting Technique).

Click to expand...

--
John

John Mankos said:

http://www.pbase.com/mankman
Canon EOS 10D

Equipment list in profile...subject to change on a daily basis ;^)

Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and
it holds the universe together

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Doug Walker said:

Either koalafarm or KiranP complained to Phil about DavidP's post
about his Epson 2200. Phil even went so far as threantening to ban
DavidP unless he behaves and then moved his post to the "Open
forum" forum!!
Unbelievable!! Neither koalafarm or KiranP have contributed
anything of value to this forum except their requirements to censor
the subject line and/or the content of every post on this forum.
How dare they!! How is it that the anal rentative types have any
control over this forum. I advise all to boycott all post from
these two control freaks.
DavidP, you are a learning process, keep posting!
I have sent a complaint about koalafarm and kiranp to phil. I
encourage all that feel the same to email Phil as well.
Don't let this forum be controlled by those that wish to censor
this forum. Please send an email to Phil expressing your feelings.
--
Doug Walker
Check my profile for equipment list.

Click to expand...

John Davis said:

John

Doug Walker said:

Either koalafarm or KiranP complained to Phil about DavidP's post
about his Epson 2200. Phil even went so far as threantening to ban
DavidP unless he behaves and then moved his post to the "Open
forum" forum!!
Unbelievable!! Neither koalafarm or KiranP have contributed
anything of value to this forum except their requirements to censor
the subject line and/or the content of every post on this forum.
How dare they!! How is it that the anal rentative types have any
control over this forum. I advise all to boycott all post from
these two control freaks.
DavidP, you are a learning process, keep posting!
I have sent a complaint about koalafarm and kiranp to phil. I
encourage all that feel the same to email Phil as well.
Don't let this forum be controlled by those that wish to censor
this forum. Please send an email to Phil expressing your feelings.
--
Doug Walker
Check my profile for equipment list.

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Kiran P said:

First of all, I never spoke to Phil at all. Second of all, I
wasn't even trying to get the post moved. All I asked is that
threads should have appropriate titles so that we can decide if its
something we want to read or not, as opposed to just having to
click on it cause we didn't know what it was about at all.
Thirdly, I have actually been quite helpful. Just a couple of days
ago I helped fill someone in about white balance issues. Even
though many people wrote 2 cents, I went to the trouble to outline
the differences between AWB, presets, manual, and using the temp.
scale. And that was jsut a few days ago, never mind the number of
times I've really helped way before that.

I don't want David banned at all so please stop your witch hunt.
Clicking on some of these threads is like opening up a book without
reading the title. Would it be great if all the thread titles just
started with a number... as in Theard 20324, then 20325 and so on?
Cause that is what its like sometimes when people don't take the 10
seconds to think of a thoughtful title.

Tell you what, if my idea was so bad, start posting messages with
wacky thread titles and see how many other people you pi$$ off,
cause I can assure you, its not just me, and my intentions were
only to help the greatest number of people here. Cause you know,
we do have lots of people here now. Its not just you anymore, who
may be part of the in group that gets to decide how things are run.

Now I'm curious. Exactly what did you say to Phil? "Ban this guy
cause he's trying to take the forum over by just asking people to
post an appropriate title?" Whatever happened to Phil knows best,
its his forum. Looks like he moved David's thread and everything
else remains intact. So exactly who was in the wrong here buddy?
(and just incase anyone asks, I didn't even think david was in teh
wrong. all i wanted was a move to better thread titles)

I do have to commend you on your title though. It was very
accurate and descriptive. Looks like my suggestions are helping.

Kiran

Click to expand...

UncleMikey said:

Did it ever ocurr to you that this forum has gotten along very
well, in fact it has become one of the best single sources of
digital photo info in the entire world, all without your help?

Learn to use the search feature and you won't need to worry about
the appropriateness of titles.

Kiran P said:

First of all, I never spoke to Phil at all. Second of all, I
wasn't even trying to get the post moved. All I asked is that
threads should have appropriate titles so that we can decide if its
something we want to read or not, as opposed to just having to
click on it cause we didn't know what it was about at all.
Thirdly, I have actually been quite helpful. Just a couple of days
ago I helped fill someone in about white balance issues. Even
though many people wrote 2 cents, I went to the trouble to outline
the differences between AWB, presets, manual, and using the temp.
scale. And that was jsut a few days ago, never mind the number of
times I've really helped way before that.

I don't want David banned at all so please stop your witch hunt.
Clicking on some of these threads is like opening up a book without
reading the title. Would it be great if all the thread titles just
started with a number... as in Theard 20324, then 20325 and so on?
Cause that is what its like sometimes when people don't take the 10
seconds to think of a thoughtful title.

Tell you what, if my idea was so bad, start posting messages with
wacky thread titles and see how many other people you pi$$ off,
cause I can assure you, its not just me, and my intentions were
only to help the greatest number of people here. Cause you know,
we do have lots of people here now. Its not just you anymore, who
may be part of the in group that gets to decide how things are run.

Now I'm curious. Exactly what did you say to Phil? "Ban this guy
cause he's trying to take the forum over by just asking people to
post an appropriate title?" Whatever happened to Phil knows best,
its his forum. Looks like he moved David's thread and everything
else remains intact. So exactly who was in the wrong here buddy?
(and just incase anyone asks, I didn't even think david was in teh
wrong. all i wanted was a move to better thread titles)

I do have to commend you on your title though. It was very
accurate and descriptive. Looks like my suggestions are helping.

Kiran

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

UncleMikey said:

Did it ever ocurr to you that this forum has gotten along very
well, in fact it has become one of the best single sources of
digital photo info in the entire world, all without your help?

Learn to use the search feature and you won't need to worry about
the appropriateness of titles.

Kiran P said:

First of all, I never spoke to Phil at all. Second of all, I
wasn't even trying to get the post moved. All I asked is that
threads should have appropriate titles so that we can decide if its
something we want to read or not, as opposed to just having to
click on it cause we didn't know what it was about at all.
Thirdly, I have actually been quite helpful. Just a couple of days
ago I helped fill someone in about white balance issues. Even
though many people wrote 2 cents, I went to the trouble to outline
the differences between AWB, presets, manual, and using the temp.
scale. And that was jsut a few days ago, never mind the number of
times I've really helped way before that.

I don't want David banned at all so please stop your witch hunt.
Clicking on some of these threads is like opening up a book without
reading the title. Would it be great if all the thread titles just
started with a number... as in Theard 20324, then 20325 and so on?
Cause that is what its like sometimes when people don't take the 10
seconds to think of a thoughtful title.

Tell you what, if my idea was so bad, start posting messages with
wacky thread titles and see how many other people you pi$$ off,
cause I can assure you, its not just me, and my intentions were
only to help the greatest number of people here. Cause you know,
we do have lots of people here now. Its not just you anymore, who
may be part of the in group that gets to decide how things are run.

Now I'm curious. Exactly what did you say to Phil? "Ban this guy
cause he's trying to take the forum over by just asking people to
post an appropriate title?" Whatever happened to Phil knows best,
its his forum. Looks like he moved David's thread and everything
else remains intact. So exactly who was in the wrong here buddy?
(and just incase anyone asks, I didn't even think david was in teh
wrong. all i wanted was a move to better thread titles)

I do have to commend you on your title though. It was very
accurate and descriptive. Looks like my suggestions are helping.

Kiran

Click to expand...

Click to expand...