Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It does...but we have seen such kind of 'promises' many times before. Lighting fast HD's of thousands of Terabytes. So I prefer to see it as a promise!chris_uk wrote:
This seems promising for storage needs in the future.
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-storage-terabytes-dvd.html
You know, I've seen science news reports about technology "breakthroughs" but have never seen anything near them come into a real product. Why? I wouldn't be surprised if "big business" buys up the technology and puts the patents on the shelf to maintain their old technology industry they earn big profits on.M Lammerse wrote:
It does...but we have seen such kind of 'promises' many times before. Lighting fast HD's of thousands of Terabytes. So I prefer to see it as a promise!chris_uk wrote:
This seems promising for storage needs in the future.
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-storage-terabytes-dvd.html![]()
The usefulness of this will depend a lot on write speed and longevity, but it could present a real breakthrough for archival and offline storage for large companies and data centres as it would require far fewer devices and discs.chris_uk wrote:
This seems promising for storage needs in the future.
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-storage-terabytes-dvd.html
Nice but...chris_uk wrote:
This seems promising for storage needs in the future.
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-storage-terabytes-dvd.html
Some do show up later. But often *much* later because they are demoed so early on the development curve. And a big reason why others don't is that despite any inherent advantages they may have, the 'old' technology develops too, and the huge amounts of knowledge and expertise that exist for it means it may well develop faster and remain cheaper. Case in point is hard disk drives - they have inherent reliability issues compared to solid-state solutions, for decades we have seen 'promising' technologies that will replace them. But expertise in HDDs pushed their cost down, and reliability and capacity up, outstripping what could reasonably be expected from the 'promising' tech (at least with sensible levels of investment). Only now is one realistically going to do that (SSD) and even then HDDs are likely to have a cost advantage for high capacity, less speed-critical, applications for many years.RedFox88 wrote:
You know, I've seen science news reports about technology "breakthroughs" but have never seen anything near them come into a real product. Why? I wouldn't be surprised if "big business" buys up the technology and puts the patents on the shelf to maintain their old technology industry they earn big profits on.M Lammerse wrote:
It does...but we have seen such kind of 'promises' many times before. Lighting fast HD's of thousands of Terabytes. So I prefer to see it as a promise!chris_uk wrote:
This seems promising for storage needs in the future.
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-storage-terabytes-dvd.html![]()
Mark den Hartog wrote:
at this rate we all be working in the cloud in 10 years (usually that means 5)
eNo wrote:
Analogy for you: do you still need cash? Many of us have a safe at home to stash some cash and valuables. The equivalent to the digital cloud here is online banking, ATM cards and credit cards. There will always be a need for local, non-"cloud" storage. IMO, trusting in the "cloud" for everything is foolish... it's not even FDIC insured.Mark den Hartog wrote:
at this rate we all be working in the cloud in 10 years (usually that means 5)
It is the folks that apply the science that change the world.falconeyes wrote:
Yes, but it is nothing but an application of Stefan Hell's (Heidelberg, Germany) work.
He invented sub-diffraction resolution when overlaying two controlled light beams.
All other aspects involved when storing large amounts of data (like writing speed) are not addressed.
Hey Ric,RicAllan wrote:
Add to that... anyone REALLY believe it is/will be SECURE... and FREE... and able to be accessed at any time YOU want...eNo wrote:
Analogy for you: do you still need cash? Many of us have a safe at home to stash some cash and valuables. The equivalent to the digital cloud here is online banking, ATM cards and credit cards. There will always be a need for local, non-"cloud" storage. IMO, trusting in the "cloud" for everything is foolish... it's not even FDIC insured.Mark den Hartog wrote:
at this rate we all be working in the cloud in 10 years (usually that means 5)
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://imagesbyeduardo.com/
Los Angeles wedding photography that seeks the heart and spirit in each image
--
Ric
Robin, both actually do.Robin Casady wrote:
It is the folks that apply the science that change the world.falconeyes wrote:
Yes, but it is nothing but an application of Stefan Hell's (Heidelberg, Germany) work.
He invented sub-diffraction resolution when overlaying two controlled light beams.
All other aspects involved when storing large amounts of data (like writing speed) are not addressed.
coronawithlime wrote:
Wonder how long it takes to burn 1000 tb? I'm already 65, I might not make it.![]()
Sorry you can't distinguish between emphasis and shouting...Mark den Hartog wrote:
Hey Ric,RicAllan wrote:
Add to that... anyone REALLY believe it is/will be SECURE... and FREE... and able to be accessed at any time YOU want...eNo wrote:
Analogy for you: do you still need cash? Many of us have a safe at home to stash some cash and valuables. The equivalent to the digital cloud here is online banking, ATM cards and credit cards. There will always be a need for local, non-"cloud" storage. IMO, trusting in the "cloud" for everything is foolish... it's not even FDIC insured.Mark den Hartog wrote:
at this rate we all be working in the cloud in 10 years (usually that means 5)
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://imagesbyeduardo.com/
Los Angeles wedding photography that seeks the heart and spirit in each image
--
Ric
no need to SHOUT to get your point across.
Yes we will still have storage on our computers but cloud will get bigger and bigger whether you like it or not. (it's already happening you know!)
Most likely you will have a "copy" in the cloud and the originals in the "safety" of your own home.
Cloud will be most likely be more secure than your PC at home. Although your PC will be of less interest for hackers. Cloud will be safer than your own home, your house might burn down, PC could get stolen,,, and you know what? if it happens to me I still have all my files!
The point I am trying to make is that a manufacturer is not going to invest in a dying breed.
Therefore it's not going to happen. Blu-ray is the last of the titans, mark my words!
have a great weekend,
Mark
me too.Sorry you can't distinguish between emphasis and shouting...
LOLAnd you're really going to have to work on your delusional affliction.
Most people don't do that. I'm guessing you don't either.At home, I can UNPLUG my computer from the net. Not as much to protect from theft as to minimize exposure to hackers and viruses. (One of the reasons I will NOT hook my camera up to the computer and/or, especially, the net.)
Actually, I do. Internet is a fast growing B!tchYou also don't factor in the advance (and growth) in camera resolution with the attendant increase in file size and data transfer speeds.
I totally agree on that one.We each have our own comfort level with public exposure of our property and believe it or not, not everyone is as trusting or int he same frame of mind as you are.
--
Ric
Only reason you think so is because you're the same age as meSolomon wrote:
Now THAT was funny.
Regards,
Sol
coronawithlime wrote:
Wonder how long it takes to burn 1000 tb? I'm already 65, I might not make it.![]()