It’s official: Olympus will develop lenses for Sony.

aarond wrote:
moimoi wrote:

Well, if Sony benefits from the Olympus lenses, Olympus may benefit from Sony's sensor technology.
Where have you been?

http://www.imaging-resource.com/new...ensor-supplier-for-flagship-mirrorless-camera
Yes, but it is MFT, and I was more concerned with the future rather than the past, i.e., with larger sensor (e.g., 24 mm x 36 mm). I would love to see Olympus and Pentax equipped with FF sensors to bring more competition in the market.

 
zackiedawg wrote:

I'm very familiar with it - I've actually shot with it, and the Minolta 600mm F4 as well. Excellent lenses indeed. When I picked up my Minolta 300mm F4 APO, I also tested out the 400mm F4.5 and 600mm APOs, which the party I bought from also had.

My only concern with the Minolta 400mm F4.5 is that like my 300mm F4, it's an old, uncovered lens, and close to unrepairable if it breaks (very few shops or individuals will work on these lenses) - so when getting into $2000-5000 price range, I feel a bit more confident having a warranty, and the ability to service/repair. For a super-steal of a price, I'd probably still grab one without hesitation...but otherwise I may wait to see what the new lens looks like and where it prices out.
True, I wonder whether KEH can fix issues from such a lens if necessary. 3k USD is a lot of money, so it also makes sense to wait for the new lens.

I "feel lucky" that I do not shoot wildlife because the 400 mm f/4.5 will have been mine already. Anyhow, I think there will be no shopping this year as I have all gear I need for now.

Good luck, sometimes choices are tough.

Cheers,

moimoi

 
moimoi wrote:
aarond wrote:
moimoi wrote:

Well, if Sony benefits from the Olympus lenses, Olympus may benefit from Sony's sensor technology.
Where have you been?

http://www.imaging-resource.com/new...ensor-supplier-for-flagship-mirrorless-camera
Yes, but it is MFT, and I was more concerned with the future rather than the past, i.e., with larger sensor (e.g., 24 mm x 36 mm). I would love to see Olympus and Pentax equipped with FF sensors to bring more competition in the market.
Maybe one day Olympus will rebadge the Olympus designed Sony A-mount lenses for their own FF mount. A low cost and low risk entry to FF.
 
moimoi wrote:
aarond wrote:
moimoi wrote:

Well, if Sony benefits from the Olympus lenses, Olympus may benefit from Sony's sensor technology.
Where have you been?

http://www.imaging-resource.com/new...ensor-supplier-for-flagship-mirrorless-camera
Yes, but it is MFT, and I was more concerned with the future rather than the past, i.e., with larger sensor (e.g., 24 mm x 36 mm). I would love to see Olympus and Pentax equipped with FF sensors to bring more competition in the market.
Maybe one day Olympus will rebadge the Olympus designed Sony A-mount lenses for their own FF mount. A low cost and low risk entry to FF.
Would be lovely. I want FF to be more accessible for people, thus to be cheaper. If we can get entry FF cameras for 1.5k USD, that would be helpful. I do not think we are very far from this.
 
The writing is already off the wall and in some cameras.
Big pixel counts and on-board multi-exposure stacking
are already enabling more "zoom" per buck.
This trend will only accelerate.
 
moimoi wrote:

Well, if Sony benefits from the Olympus lenses, Olympus may benefit from Sony's sensor technology. Compactness and Full frame technology are not incompatible (e.g., RX1). It might be expensive now, but who knows in 5 years. We will see.
Putting a full frame in a small body is fraught with difficulties e.g. minimizing distortion, vignetting, maintaining corner sharpness, etc. The only reason why the RX1 works is that is the sensor is couples to fixed lens. Putting a zoom lens on a small body with large sensor would mitigate the overall performance and defeat the purpose of having a large sensor.
 
Good news, but SAR does a syllogism. Because at this point: it's not because they have some agreements between the two brands, that necessarily proves a launch for a mirrorless design in 2014 (for the a-mount).

Regards,
--
Michel J
« Having the latest gear is nice, but great photographers don't have to have it. They can shoot good stuff with anything »
 
Last edited:
Cimarron wrote:

I think the market will consolidate around those two formats. 35mm-equivalent cameras will become more affordable, thus eliminating the need for APS-C DSLRs, which are almost the same size and use the same-sized lenses.
You could just as well say that APS-C DSLRs, e.g. Canon 100D/SL1, with suitable lenses, are not much bigger than NEX and m43 while offering some significant advantages like higher AF speed and better ergonomics. The problem with APS-C is that there are relatively few high quality lenses designed especially for this sensor size (this applies not only to Canikon but also Sony NEX and others).

The extra cost for FF sensors is still too much for the average buyer, especially as long as the worldwide economy is in trouble. And I doubt the average user is interested in carrying the high quality FF lenses that you need to realise the potential of these high quality sensors, even if the prices were affordable.
 
Ron Poelman wrote:

The writing is already off the wall and in some cameras.
Big pixel counts and on-board multi-exposure stacking
are already enabling more "zoom" per buck.
This trend will only accelerate.
Sorry but I am going to disagree here. For sports shooters and wildlife photographers, large lenses are here to stay. Multi focus stacking is fine when you have a subject which is stationary, in the 2 genres mentioned above, that isn't a realistic option.

--
John De Bord Photography
Showcasing the Images of Colorado
website: http://jdebordphoto.com
G+ https://plus.google.com/103586615087663445665/about
photoblog: http://jdebordphoto.blogspot.com/
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/jdebordphotography
 
Last edited:
John De Bord Photography wrote:
Ron Poelman wrote:

The writing is already off the wall and in some cameras.
Big pixel counts and on-board multi-exposure stacking
are already enabling more "zoom" per buck.
This trend will only accelerate.
Sorry but I am going to disagree here. For sports shooters and wildlife photographers, large lenses are here to stay. Multi focus stacking is fine when you have a subject which is stationary, in the 2 genres mentioned above, that isn't a realistic option.
and sometimes large (bright) lenses are required just to get the small DOF that is necessary for a nice separation of the subject, or to get the fastest possible shutter speed with still good image quality; no way to get around this with electronic trickery.
 
Being a dual user of both Olympus and Sony, I can promise you that you will love any new Zuiko lenses for the Alpha mount.

The Olympus kit lenses tend to be better than anything else in the same category, and their high grade lenses are spectacular. I think they compare very favorably with Zeiss glass, and are a better value.

Of course, they probably won't be labeled as "Zuiko" but they will be designed by the same Olympus lens designers, then built by Sony at their own facilities. Pretty much like the same arrangement that Panasonic has with Leica.

Honestly, the best possible outcome would be if Olympus designed lenses for NEX, and not for Alpha. Because that is where Sony needs the most help....
 
Marty4650 wrote:

Honestly, the best possible outcome would be if Olympus designed lenses for NEX, and not for Alpha. Because that is where Sony needs the most help....

--
Marty
Olympus doesn't have the experience building interchangeable lenses with OIS, so just designing Alpha lenses makes more sense.
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top