Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, but it is MFT, and I was more concerned with the future rather than the past, i.e., with larger sensor (e.g., 24 mm x 36 mm). I would love to see Olympus and Pentax equipped with FF sensors to bring more competition in the market.aarond wrote:
Where have you been?moimoi wrote:
Well, if Sony benefits from the Olympus lenses, Olympus may benefit from Sony's sensor technology.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/new...ensor-supplier-for-flagship-mirrorless-camera
True, I wonder whether KEH can fix issues from such a lens if necessary. 3k USD is a lot of money, so it also makes sense to wait for the new lens.zackiedawg wrote:
I'm very familiar with it - I've actually shot with it, and the Minolta 600mm F4 as well. Excellent lenses indeed. When I picked up my Minolta 300mm F4 APO, I also tested out the 400mm F4.5 and 600mm APOs, which the party I bought from also had.
My only concern with the Minolta 400mm F4.5 is that like my 300mm F4, it's an old, uncovered lens, and close to unrepairable if it breaks (very few shops or individuals will work on these lenses) - so when getting into $2000-5000 price range, I feel a bit more confident having a warranty, and the ability to service/repair. For a super-steal of a price, I'd probably still grab one without hesitation...but otherwise I may wait to see what the new lens looks like and where it prices out.
Maybe one day Olympus will rebadge the Olympus designed Sony A-mount lenses for their own FF mount. A low cost and low risk entry to FF.moimoi wrote:
Yes, but it is MFT, and I was more concerned with the future rather than the past, i.e., with larger sensor (e.g., 24 mm x 36 mm). I would love to see Olympus and Pentax equipped with FF sensors to bring more competition in the market.aarond wrote:
Where have you been?moimoi wrote:
Well, if Sony benefits from the Olympus lenses, Olympus may benefit from Sony's sensor technology.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/new...ensor-supplier-for-flagship-mirrorless-camera
Would be lovely. I want FF to be more accessible for people, thus to be cheaper. If we can get entry FF cameras for 1.5k USD, that would be helpful. I do not think we are very far from this.Maybe one day Olympus will rebadge the Olympus designed Sony A-mount lenses for their own FF mount. A low cost and low risk entry to FF.moimoi wrote:
Yes, but it is MFT, and I was more concerned with the future rather than the past, i.e., with larger sensor (e.g., 24 mm x 36 mm). I would love to see Olympus and Pentax equipped with FF sensors to bring more competition in the market.aarond wrote:
Where have you been?moimoi wrote:
Well, if Sony benefits from the Olympus lenses, Olympus may benefit from Sony's sensor technology.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/new...ensor-supplier-for-flagship-mirrorless-camera
Putting a full frame in a small body is fraught with difficulties e.g. minimizing distortion, vignetting, maintaining corner sharpness, etc. The only reason why the RX1 works is that is the sensor is couples to fixed lens. Putting a zoom lens on a small body with large sensor would mitigate the overall performance and defeat the purpose of having a large sensor.moimoi wrote:
Well, if Sony benefits from the Olympus lenses, Olympus may benefit from Sony's sensor technology. Compactness and Full frame technology are not incompatible (e.g., RX1). It might be expensive now, but who knows in 5 years. We will see.
John De Bord Photography wrote:
Wow this is pretty big news. http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/its-official-olympus-will-develop-lenses-for-sony/ It also seems Oly will be developing the upcoming 400mm F4. What worries me? Price. Oly lenses = BIG $ but they are outstanding quality, I'll say that.
You could just as well say that APS-C DSLRs, e.g. Canon 100D/SL1, with suitable lenses, are not much bigger than NEX and m43 while offering some significant advantages like higher AF speed and better ergonomics. The problem with APS-C is that there are relatively few high quality lenses designed especially for this sensor size (this applies not only to Canikon but also Sony NEX and others).Cimarron wrote:
I think the market will consolidate around those two formats. 35mm-equivalent cameras will become more affordable, thus eliminating the need for APS-C DSLRs, which are almost the same size and use the same-sized lenses.
Sorry but I am going to disagree here. For sports shooters and wildlife photographers, large lenses are here to stay. Multi focus stacking is fine when you have a subject which is stationary, in the 2 genres mentioned above, that isn't a realistic option.Ron Poelman wrote:
The writing is already off the wall and in some cameras.
Big pixel counts and on-board multi-exposure stacking
are already enabling more "zoom" per buck.
This trend will only accelerate.
and sometimes large (bright) lenses are required just to get the small DOF that is necessary for a nice separation of the subject, or to get the fastest possible shutter speed with still good image quality; no way to get around this with electronic trickery.John De Bord Photography wrote:
Sorry but I am going to disagree here. For sports shooters and wildlife photographers, large lenses are here to stay. Multi focus stacking is fine when you have a subject which is stationary, in the 2 genres mentioned above, that isn't a realistic option.Ron Poelman wrote:
The writing is already off the wall and in some cameras.
Big pixel counts and on-board multi-exposure stacking
are already enabling more "zoom" per buck.
This trend will only accelerate.
Marty4650 wrote:
Honestly, the best possible outcome would be if Olympus designed lenses for NEX, and not for Alpha. Because that is where Sony needs the most help....
Olympus doesn't have the experience building interchangeable lenses with OIS, so just designing Alpha lenses makes more sense.Marty4650 wrote:
Honestly, the best possible outcome would be if Olympus designed lenses for NEX, and not for Alpha. Because that is where Sony needs the most help....
--
Marty