Do I really "need" a Q :-)

Started Apr 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
viking79 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,147
Re: +1

fakuryu wrote:

I see, then lets do hope so that Pentax would release a good wide for the Q even if not a UW

-- hide signature --

There is no such thing a "Pro" level gear, just Pro level work.

The 5-15mm is very good at 5mm, so it is a pretty decent wide, something like an 18mm on APS-C.  A good prime lens 3 to 4mm would be nice though, say with 1.9 or larger aperture too.  Hopefully they make something, it looks like they have a 12-24mm (rough approximate) on their roadmap, so that would be like a 3.3 to 6.6mm zoom.


-- hide signature --

I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)
See my Blog at: (bi-weekly)
Flickr Photostream: (updated daily)

 viking79's gear list:viking79's gear list
Sony Alpha a7R Samsung NX1 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA Samsung NX 60mm F2.8 Macro ED OIS SSA +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow