Do I really "need" a Q :-)

Started Apr 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
viking79 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,149
Re: +1

fakuryu wrote:

Seems very interesting but I'm really waiting for is a ultra wide for the Q

Ultra wide for such a small sensor is a difficult proposition.  There are a few high quality C mount lenses that might cover that need.  You really need 3.5mm or so for a 12mm APS-C equivalent, and some of these might not perform all that well.  There are also several high quality fisheye 1.8mm or so lenses, but the good ones are like $400+.

We need Pentax to release a good UW


-- hide signature --

I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)
See my Blog at: (bi-weekly)
Flickr Photostream: (updated daily)

 viking79's gear list:viking79's gear list
Sony a7R Samsung NX1 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA Samsung NX 60mm F2.8 Macro ED OIS SSA +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow