Wides and Normals: amaziing resolution findings at Lens Rentals...

slimandy wrote:
amalric wrote:
My argument however is not about this, it is about the pretense of forcing shallow DOF to genres it doesn't belong to at all, like in Street Shooting. There is a fine example here:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51247571

What do you earn by forcing a modicum of bokeh in the street, where the onlooker would rather have the complete scene surrounding the subject?

Frankly I don't remember HCB or Doisneau, the masters of the genre, making use of it.
Really? I do...

http://sobrefotografia.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/henri-cartier-bresson-7.jpg
It just happened. Bokeh happens to me too :)
For the simple reason that a large aperture slows you down, since you can't make use of hyperfocal, and since it creates a very busy bokeh with obstacles. And then why hide the mess in the street in the first place?
If you want to isolate your subject you don't need hyperfocal. You focus on you subject.

This is street, not landscape.
I am not sure that your being Master of the College of Stockbrokers of Brobdinagg, and peddling your piccies at 19 pounds a piece entitles you to judge my street shooting, which is varied, free and appreciated by electronic crowds, despite I use hyperfocal, or deep DOF. I couldn't detect much Street in your Ambitious Site...

So tone down the Inquisition, unless you have no fear of Ridicule, Sir.
Do you want to beautify it? Beautification and political correctness are the cardinal sins of the suburban 'culture' Lack of sincerity and lack of perspective are another two.

HCB was a master at selecting the geometry of an image, without using bokeh. I am not sure that at the time there weren't big fast lenses - I myself have a Sonnar 85/2 from the 1950s, but that's the kind of thing you don't use in the street, because it draws too much attention.
HCB principally used a Leica rangefinder. Leica make some of the fastest glass in the world.
Leica started by making a folding 50mm/3.5 normal exactly for the same reason why we like pancakes at m4/3. Because they are small.

Just ponder, Sir.

Am.
 
Your rudeness and sarcasm tell me all I need to know about you. If your opinion had any validity you would not need to resort to either.
 
slimandy wrote:

He didn't shoot with an MFT camera though. He tends not to shoot anything that needs shallow DOF or in low light either. If you want to shoot @ f64 you're in the wrong forum!
I suppose that transaltes then to about f/8.0 in MFT. So maybe amalric should found the F/8.0 club.
 
KenBalbari wrote:
slimandy wrote:

He didn't shoot with an MFT camera though. He tends not to shoot anything that needs shallow DOF or in low light either. If you want to shoot @ f64 you're in the wrong forum!
I suppose that transaltes then to about f/8.0 in MFT. So maybe amalric should found the F/8.0 club.
Yes, probably.

The camera Adams used also makes a mockery of the term 'full frame' meaning 35mm.
 
Last edited:
amalric wrote:
So tone down the Inquisition, unless you have no fear of Ridicule, Sir.
Magister Luny is growing tired of these cheap shot from mere hoi polloi. Ingrates all, mere vermin !



.

They self-righteously assail me with their pitiful barbs. Do they not recognize true artistic genius ?



.

Look what happened to the last poseur who assaulted my artistic honor. Rather lost his head, eh ?



.

Not long after, he crawled like a dog back into his decrepit rented room (shared kitchen, bath).



.

Soon after, the entire clan of the bokeh poseurs began to squirm and writhe in my terrible wrath.



.

Yes, that's it, man the last lifeboat, your one measely chance to escape like pitiful worms, scum ...



... before the endless night of vapid, uninspired ignorance descends upon the tramps and beggars.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top