Phororhacos
Senior Member
The D800E was never bad for me, I don(t see any changes in its focus ability after the firmware.
Hell of a camera, always was!
Walter
Hell of a camera, always was!
Walter
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
John Motts wrote:
Marcin 3M wrote:
My 24-70/2,8 needs different af-ft values for outer af points than the center point while at 70mm, and is fine with -10 value all over the image, while at 24mm it requires about +5.
Firmware didn't fixed that.
Marcin 3M wrote:
John Motts wrote:
Marcin 3M wrote:
My 24-70/2,8 needs different af-ft values for outer af points than the center point while at 70mm, and is fine with -10 value all over the image, while at 24mm it requires about +5.
Firmware didn't fixed that.
Marcin 3M wrote:
My 24-70/2,8 needs different af-ft values for outer af points than the center point while at 70mm, and is fine with -10 value all over the image, while at 24mm it requires about +5.
Firmware didn't fixed that.
Robin you are bang off, here is why. The initial poster here remarked saying people who have sent their camera off to Nikon again and again, who still can't seem to fix their left AF point issue should just roll over and become a fanboy just because of some firmware update, which might I add, does not fix it. Yeh, that's a fanboy!Robin Casady wrote:
I'm saying that some people will complain no matter what happens. Nikon comes out with a firmware update that improves AF and all one person can talk about is why something that seems to have been improved isn't on the change list. No celebration about a problem getting fixed. Just accusations that Nikon is lying because they didn't mention fixing something that appears to be fixed.drifter605 wrote:
Are you saying everyone should also be a fanboy & just praise Nikon for their QC & service plus the fact that it has taken a year for this update? are you also saying you would not complain if you had a faulty item?Robin Casady wrote:
There wont be positive responses from guys that have a chronic need to complain about something.drifter605 wrote:
Hi, there won't be positive responses from the guys that still have an expensive camera with L/H focus points that still can't focus & it seems Nikon can't fix! Or from those that used focus trap!T O Shooter wrote:
I've been reading the threads on the latest D800 firmware and there seems to be a lot of positive responses. It's obvious it didn't give everyone what was on their wish list, but that's really to be expected. Maybe over time this will eradicate some of the negativity associated with the D800 and it will end up being regarded as the superb camera it really is.
Like who remember Bill and Monica now?? Maybe bad example.
Looking forward to getting mine ( and the D4 ) updated for the weekend and hopefully I'll be as pleased with the results as some of you are. I may end up with the camera I hoped it would be.
--
Robin Casady
http://www.robincasady.com/Photo/index.html
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
— Bertrand Russell
Some are so emotionally invested in complaining that they can't let go of it.
You don't have to be a fanboy to be happy about a firmware improvement. Only being able say negative things about it is a good indication that you are a hysterical whiner.
--
Robin Casady
http://www.robincasady.com/Photo/index.html
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
— Bertrand Russell
primeshooter wrote:
Robin Casady wrote:
drifter605 wrote:
Robin Casady wrote:
There wont be positive responses from guys that have a chronic need to complain about something.drifter605 wrote:
Hi, there won't be positive responses from the guys that still have an expensive camera with L/H focus points that still can't focus & it seems Nikon can't fix! Or from those that used focus trap!T O Shooter wrote:
I've been reading the threads on the latest D800 firmware and there seems to be a lot of positive responses. It's obvious it didn't give everyone what was on their wish list, but that's really to be expected. Maybe over time this will eradicate some of the negativity associated with the D800 and it will end up being regarded as the superb camera it really is.
Like who remember Bill and Monica now?? Maybe bad example.
Looking forward to getting mine ( and the D4 ) updated for the weekend and hopefully I'll be as pleased with the results as some of you are. I may end up with the camera I hoped it would be.
I really appreciate your flexibility in changing your "tune" with the change in your experience with the camera, as well as your willingness to be equally vocal about the positive improvements as you were about the problems. This balanced behaviour of yours is very refreshing.Shotcents wrote:
Few people were as unhappy with Nikon, via the D800 disaster, as me. ...
... And now I'm having a near perfect AF result and my buddies are reporting the same. THRILLED isn't a big enough word. ...
... As for me...I'm enjoying my NEW D800 with AF that is absolutely not missing shots like it used to. I'm really looking forward to using it on a job in two weeks.
Marcin 3M wrote:
My 24-70/2,8 needs different af-ft values for outer af points than the center point while at 70mm, and is fine with -10 value all over the image, while at 24mm it requires about +5.
Firmware didn't fixed that.
Alejandro Daz del Ro Fery wrote:
This FW has failed to solved my blood pressure and cholesterol.![]()
I expect this firmware update will reduce the high blood pressure, caused by performance anxiety, for many photographers.Alejandro Daz del Ro Fery wrote:
This FW has failed to solved my blood pressure and cholesterol.![]()
T O Shooter wrote:
I've been reading the threads on the latest D800 firmware and there seems to be a lot of positive responses. It's obvious it didn't give everyone what was on their wish list, but that's really to be expected. Maybe over time this will eradicate some of the negativity associated with the D800 and it will end up being regarded as the superb camera it really is.
Like who remember Bill and Monica now?? Maybe bad example.
Looking forward to getting mine ( and the D4 ) updated for the weekend and hopefully I'll be as pleased with the results as some of you are. I may end up with the camera I hoped it would be.
I really wish people would not lie about the history of the D800. And I hope we don't see the same sort of lies about the D600.marike6 wrote:
My D800 was never bad for me, at all, in fact it's by far the best camera I've ever owned including my 5D Mk II and X-Pro1 (and a long list of others).
I pre-ordered the D800 when it was announced, and it has exceeded my expectations by a mile. I have no issues with AF (it's quite fast and accurate even in low-light) and files from the camera are gorgeous.
To have access to the kind of IQ that the D800 provides for under 3000 USD is remarkable so I usually take any D800 rants with a grain of salt. But for whatever reason, people on these boards will pick appart anything camera no matter what. And over the past few months, I've seen a lot of blame going to the gear that could easily have been chalked up to user error or not reading the manual. But no one camera, as great as the D800 is, is the right fit for every photographers.
But I don't appreciate threads that try to speak for my experience with the D800 (or a collective D800 experience) which has been overwhelmingly positive.
LOL. lying is a harsh term Robert..from the posters perspective hes telling the truth as he perceives it..Shotcents wrote:
I really wish people would not lie about the history of the D800. And I hope we don't see the same sort of lies about the D600.marike6 wrote:
My D800 was never bad for me, at all, in fact it's by far the best camera I've ever owned including my 5D Mk II and X-Pro1 (and a long list of others).
I pre-ordered the D800 when it was announced, and it has exceeded my expectations by a mile. I have no issues with AF (it's quite fast and accurate even in low-light) and files from the camera are gorgeous.
To have access to the kind of IQ that the D800 provides for under 3000 USD is remarkable so I usually take any D800 rants with a grain of salt. But for whatever reason, people on these boards will pick appart anything camera no matter what. And over the past few months, I've seen a lot of blame going to the gear that could easily have been chalked up to user error or not reading the manual. But no one camera, as great as the D800 is, is the right fit for every photographers.
But I don't appreciate threads that try to speak for my experience with the D800 (or a collective D800 experience) which has been overwhelmingly positive.
BOTH the D800 and D600 have had the worst history of ANY DSLR camera I've seen. The issues have been documented, written about, video recorded and widely IGNORED by Nikon.
Until now. So far as I can tell the new firmware has made the D800 a much more reliable focusing camera. Most of the photos I see from the the folks NOT complaining are not asking much of the AF module and that's fine.
But those who push these cameras into poor lighting scenarios with fast lenses know where the limitations have been. After updating the firmware and pressing the camera into TERRIBLE lighting environments the improvement is HUGE.
Robert
Hi,T O Shooter wrote:
I've been reading the threads on the latest D800 firmware and there seems to be a lot of positive responses. It's obvious it didn't give everyone what was on their wish list, but that's really to be expected. Maybe over time this will eradicate some of the negativity associated with the D800 and it will end up being regarded as the superb camera it really is.
Like who remember Bill and Monica now?? Maybe bad example.
Looking forward to getting mine ( and the D4 ) updated for the weekend and hopefully I'll be as pleased with the results as some of you are. I may end up with the camera I hoped it would be.