>>>> Street Photography eXchange #35 <<<

fad

Forum Pro
Messages
18,801
Reaction score
5,366
Location
NYC, NY, US
831bcde359d746099b4f1fa4e547a5f7.jpg

Thread #35

This is the former Anything Goes section of Weekly Street Photography.

It is the place to post your serious photos and to make thoughtful comments.

>>Always post in threaded view.
(It keeps things organized and makes your photos easier to notice.)
Post photos in threaded view in reply to this post.


--
Frank
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
 






Thought to be Diderot (left), by Loos - Now certainly not Diderot (right), by Fragonard -Both in the Louvre.

Thought to be Diderot (left), by Loos - Now certainly not Diderot (right), by Fragonard -Both in the Louvre.

The philosophe and author of the original Encyclopédie, I took a seminar on Diderot as an undergrad French major at Yale, and my wife studied him as an art history grad student there. Among academics he is considered to be sort of an intellectual grandfather of street photography.

Googling him today, I learned that the ubiquitous classic portrait of him by Fragonard was recently proven to be someone else, whose name is illegible, but cannot be Diderot. The eyes have always been known to be the wrong color, but, as in so many things, the supply of portraits of Diderot rose to meet the demand for them. Only irrefutable documentary proof could shake people's confidence.

The great Pierre Rosenberg at the Louvre shrugged and said such matters are an everyday occurrence.

Too bad, it's a much more expressive portrait than the other.

How many other false beliefs are resting in our crania, dear friends?

--
Frank
shot in downtown Manhattan.
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
 
Last edited:




After a break, getting back to taking some street photos. Starting with my sights set low.

Cheers,
Daniel.
 

Attachments

  • 2450992.jpg
    2450992.jpg
    430.3 KB · Views: 0













--
 
This is priceless! Does anyone take him up on the offer?

Sal
 
OK....Frank...I'd like a discussion about signs. I've thought that writing, words or numbers, in a picture grab your attention, snatching it away from an intended subject. In this one I'm not discovering a connection between the motel sign and the people. So I think I'm missing something...missing the point. And...have I been wrong in my thinking about signs that don't seem to relate in a necessary way to the rest of the image?

I think I might have missed something in this image by not viewing in original size. I'll go back and look again. Maybe the trio is perusing a guide book....

Sal
 
Sal18 wrote:

OK....Frank...I'd like a discussion about signs. I've thought that writing, words or numbers, in a picture grab your attention, snatching it away from an intended subject. In this one I'm not discovering a connection between the motel sign and the people. So I think I'm missing something...missing the point. And...have I been wrong in my thinking about signs that don't seem to relate in a necessary way to the rest of the image?

I think I might have missed something in this image by not viewing in original size. I'll go back and look again. Maybe the trio is perusing a guide book....

Sal
I do believe it is a guidebook they are perusing. What else would tourists be staring at on the street in a foreign country. The tile could be: "It says here that mothers are welcome."

As far as words and pictures, there is another view. Lots of photographers make use of words in their pictures.
 
xtoph wrote:



Good catch.

If you could bear to crop out the column, the rose and the cigarette would be even more brilliant. She is iconographic with the headphones, the cigarette and the roses.





--
Frank
shot in downtown Manhattan.
http://sidewalkshadows.com/blog/ (street photos)
 
fad wrote:
Sal18 wrote:

OK....Frank...I'd like a discussion about signs. I've thought that writing, words or numbers, in a picture grab your attention, snatching it away from an intended subject. In this one I'm not discovering a connection between the motel sign and the people. So I think I'm missing something...missing the point. And...have I been wrong in my thinking about signs that don't seem to relate in a necessary way to the rest of the image?

I think I might have missed something in this image by not viewing in original size. I'll go back and look again. Maybe the trio is perusing a guide book....

Sal
I do believe it is a guidebook they are perusing. What else would tourists be staring at on the street in a foreign country. The tile could be: "It says here that mothers are welcome."

As far as words and pictures, there is another view. Lots of photographers make use of words in their pictures.
 
Ken Christie wrote:
fad wrote:
Sal18 wrote:

OK....Frank...I'd like a discussion about signs. I've thought that writing, words or numbers, in a picture grab your attention, snatching it away from an intended subject. In this one I'm not discovering a connection between the motel sign and the people. So I think I'm missing something...missing the point. And...have I been wrong in my thinking about signs that don't seem to relate in a necessary way to the rest of the image?

I think I might have missed something in this image by not viewing in original size. I'll go back and look again. Maybe the trio is perusing a guide book....

Sal
I do believe it is a guidebook they are perusing. What else would tourists be staring at on the street in a foreign country. The tile could be: "It says here that mothers are welcome."

As far as words and pictures, there is another view. Lots of photographers make use of words in their pictures.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top