Thamnophis
Active member
- Messages
- 86
- Reaction score
- 37
Do adapters reduce the light hitting the sensors, as extension tubes do? Will they turn my f1.4 lens into an effective 2.0 for example?
Thank you!
Thank you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. The adaptors are hollow tube that replace the mounting flange. There is no loss of light.Thamnophis wrote:
Do adapters reduce the light hitting the sensors, as extension tubes do? Will they turn my f1.4 lens into an effective 2.0 for example?
Thank you!
For the LAEA2 yesThamnophis wrote:
Do adapters reduce the light hitting the sensors, as extension tubes do? Will they turn my f1.4 lens into an effective 2.0 for example?
Thank you!
Addendum: this applies to modern sensors as a whole, not just our APS-C NEXes. The limiting factor is the f/stop of the microlenses on each pixel.TiagoReil wrote:
For the LAEA2 yesThamnophis wrote:
Do adapters reduce the light hitting the sensors, as extension tubes do? Will they turn my f1.4 lens into an effective 2.0 for example?
Thank you!
The rest no
About your lens. The adapter wont turn your f1.4 into an effective f2, but the sensor may.Sensors are not as effecive as they should with fast lens, so the 1.4, in terms of light (not of DoF) may become something like a 1.7
Yes, but the extension tube is putting your lens in a farther distance that it should be. An adapter, is putting the lens at the exact distance it should be, designed by the manufacturer. So you are not loosing light.Thamnophis wrote:
But...
"Their only real drawback with tubes is that there is a loss of light and this increases the more extension you add."
from: http://www.macrobellows.com/using_tubes.php
If you google "extension tube exposure" you'll see there seems to be wide agreement that extension tubes actually do effect exposure.
Don't adapters do the same?
Joe
You are confusing extension tubes with a simple tubular adaptor that merely spaces a 'non-original' lens the correct distance (i.e. the 'register' it is designed for) from the sensor. No mathematical extension of light path = no decrease in light value.Thamnophis wrote:
But...
"Their only real drawback with tubes is that there is a loss of light and this increases the more extension you add."
from: http://www.macrobellows.com/using_tubes.php
If you google "extension tube exposure" you'll see there seems to be wide agreement that extension tubes actually do effect exposure.
Don't adapters do the same?
Joe
No they don't - extension tubes do indeed affect light/exposure as well as introduce distortions, yes, but the basic NEX adapter positions the lens at the correct distance from the NEX sensor (which is the exact same distance the lens was from the film on the camera it was originally designed for*), with no loss of light/exposure.Thamnophis wrote:
But...
"Their only real drawback with tubes is that there is a loss of light and this increases the more extension you add."
from: http://www.macrobellows.com/using_tubes.php
If you google "extension tube exposure" you'll see there seems to be wide agreement that extension tubes actually do effect exposure.
Don't adapters do the same?
No, because when you use an adapter the lens ends up at its normal distance from the film or sensor, focussed at infinity.Thamnophis wrote:
But...
"Their only real drawback with tubes is that there is a loss of light and this increases the more extension you add."
from: http://www.macrobellows.com/using_tubes.php
If you google "extension tube exposure" you'll see there seems to be wide agreement that extension tubes actually do effect exposure.
Don't adapters do the same?
Joe