Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is not a matter of fault but a combination of perspective and optics. Perspective, because in none of the images of the house are you equi-distant from all four corners of the facade. Some corners are further from you and appear smaller in the image, while closer corners appear larger. You are shooting at a 74º angle of view which expands perspective. As a general rule, the perspective we see most comfortably at is between a 40º and 50º angle of view. Unless the offset point from which you took the image is oblique, these angles will give a reasonably rectangular subject. But the expansion of 74º magnifies the oblique position that you took the images from making the further corners appear even further away and the nearer corners appear nearer. Instant distortion. Also note that decreasing the angle of view below 40º has the opposite effect and compresses perspective, somewhat flattening a subject even when seen from an angle.


Steen Bay wrote:
Nothing wrong with you camera. The tilting lines (or 'keystoning') is just what happens to the perspective when the camera is tilted upwards, and especially with WA lenses. The wider the FoV, the more 'keystoning' you'll get if the camera isn't level.
Steen Bay wrote:
Nothing wrong with you camera. The tilting lines (or 'keystoning') is just what happens to the perspective when the camera is tilted upwards, and especially with WA lenses. The wider the FoV, the more 'keystoning' you'll get if the camera isn't level.
Agree. And I suspect the reason for the tilting is to get everything in. The big reason for this happening is the small sensor on P & S cameras. The only solution in camera is to keep the camera as straight as possible.
Just for clarification, the size of the P&S sensor is immaterial in this case since the lens being used is matched to and corrected for it. Using a full frame sensor or even a medium format sensor would show the same effects from an offset angle, except when paired with a tilt/shift lens. In the case of a larger sensor, possibly the barrel effect would be lessened by a better corrected optical path within the larger matched lens. The only time the size of the sensor is a factor in this type of distortion is if it is larger than the projected image of the optical design. Then you would have a full fisheye effect with all its requisite distortions.Norman B wrote:
Agree. And I suspect the reason for the tilting is to get everything in. The big reason for this happening is the small sensor on P & S cameras. The only solution in camera is to keep the camera as straight as possible.
VisionLight wrote:
Just for clarification, the size of the P&S sensor is immaterial in this case since the lens being used is matched to and corrected for it. Using a full frame sensor or even a medium format sensor would show the same effects from an offset angle, except when paired with a tilt/shift lens. In the case of a larger sensor, possibly the barrel effect would be lessened by a better corrected optical path within the larger matched lens. The only time the size of the sensor is a factor in this type of distortion is if it is larger than the projected image of the optical design. Then you would have a full fisheye effect with all its requisite distortions.Norman B wrote:
Agree. And I suspect the reason for the tilting is to get everything in. The big reason for this happening is the small sensor on P & S cameras. The only solution in camera is to keep the camera as straight as possible.
Vision
I try to keep the camera as straight as possible when taking a pic of a building. Usually, that building is a barn or some other smaller structure related to farming. It varies, keeping the camera straight causes the horizon to be in the middle of the pic a lot of the time. Allowing for cropping in post to either show the sky and small forground or large forground and small amount of sky. This is done in camera at the time the pic is taken.Thanks for the clarification. I don't know where I got the sensor idea from but your point certainly makes sense after giving it some thought. Back it the film days, it was pretty standard for a manufacturer to sell a 35 mm camera with a 50 mm lens. Tilting the camera for buildings did the same thing on those cameras as well.
Bassy wrote:
i would like to thank each one of you for your answers
and i will try to put into practice what you all have said,,,kind regards bassy
Your welcome from me. I've learned so much from reading this forum along with others.That's what forums are for IMO. They are a place to learn and share information. I'm not in the business and do the best I can with what I have. Keeping the camera straight is easier said than done at times. I think that is a good thing because it forces us to be creative. One mistake I make at times is trying to get everything in. That is not a good thing in some cases. Sometimes less is more.