Re: NX20, 210, 1000 - is it true you need a Samsung android phone..

Started Apr 24, 2012 | Discussions thread
trac63 Contributing Member • Posts: 709
Re: NX20, 210, 1000 - is it true you need a Samsung android phone..

Timmbits wrote:

Any news on this?

My HTC got bricked after a few updates and app installs (won't start anymore, just hangs on the opening gif), so I bought an LG Eclypse , which has more built-in RAM at 1GB, android 2.3 , and a 320x480 screen, and I don't have permission to download onto that one either.

Any lawyers following this thread? because it is starting to look like Samsung is in infringement of a few laws... including anti-trust legislation and the Magnussen Moss act. When I bought my camera, it said it could be remote controlled, and nowhere did it say it had to be via a Samsung-branded phone... but that is what it looks like to many of us.

Checking out the user manual, I can now see:

"supported by Galaxy series smart phones" I smell class action?

What would be the basis of the lawsuit?

Remote Viewfinder works just fine on my Motorola Atrix HD, which runs a very stock version of Android 4.1.

It's simply not the case that Samsung built their cameras so that they only talk to other Samsung phones.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow