Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
katate wrote:
Loading…
translate.google.co.jp
The judge did not accept the Nikon's claim. He said that Nikon's patent is easily invented by combining the other inventions, so it is not infringement.
Nikon is going to appeal to a higher court.
Or... they could save their money and instead put it into preserving vast areas of rain forest.katate wrote:
Loading…
translate.google.co.jp
The judge did not accept the Nikon's claim. He said that Nikon's patent is easily invented by combining the other inventions, so it is not infringement.
Nikon is going to appeal to a higher court.
Keep OS out of my Art and messing it up!Kendall Helmstetter Gelner wrote:
Thanks for the update, I wonder how much this patent dispute was affecting new lenses not offering OS...
. . . that's no way to gain a tax break.SigmaChrome wrote:.
Or... they could save their money and instead put it into preserving vast areas of rain forest.
maple wrote:
Some times law suit is not pursued for the merits of the case, but the process itself.
Kendall Helmstetter Gelner wrote:
maple wrote:
Some times law suit is not pursued for the merits of the case, but the process itself.
maple wrote:
Kendall Helmstetter Gelner wrote:
maple wrote:
Some times law suit is not pursued for the merits of the case, but the process itself.
Interesting. It would be fun to get a description of Nikon´s patent and the two that it did consist of (according to the judge).katate wrote:
The judge did not accept the Nikon's claim. He said that Nikon's patent is easily invented by combining the other inventions, so it is not infringement.
Kendall Helmstetter Gelner wrote:
maple wrote:
Some times law suit is not pursued for the merits of the case, but the process itself.