The Truth about D800 Auto Focus - fair at best

Al Giordano wrote:

Are you shooting in Servo Mode? Single Point? How many focus points are you using? What is your workflow?
See my threads but, AF-S, single point focus. No area, no dynamic, no 3d. Selecting the point myself. Usually centre point or the centre cluster cross types.
 
AllOtherNamesTaken wrote:
Al Giordano wrote:

Can you please share your D800 focus settings with us?

I scratch my head at these posts - I don't agree at all with your assessment based on my experiences with the D800.
I agree, the D800's I used had near telepathic AF, even wide open f1.4/1.8 on low contrast subjects. Some of the best AF I've ever used. This is without a doubt not a problem with every D800. Very misleading thread title.
@AllOtherNamesTaken: you seem to be consistently very lucky! First you got D800 with perfect AF, then your D600 (as well as of all your friends) have no dust/oil issues. You might start thinking of opening a Nikon reseller outfit selling perfect bodies and lenses :-)

Leo
 
Shotcents wrote:

My friends and I have done a ton of tests and tried every setting change possible.

I've been told that the D800 AF Module is a somewhat reworked version of what's in the D700, but the D800 cannot match the D700's AF prowess.
The complete opposite of my findings. I have a far greater keeper rate for my D800/E than I did for my previous D700. The AF is more accurate and faster.
The 5DIII AF is so good you almost have to work to make it miss! Clearly superior, not "close" as some reviews stated. The issue here is that the D800 "tests" great and the AF seems fine until you press it into action at a wedding or other event at which point it's not much better than my recently sold 5DII.

AF is by no means bad, but you really have to educate yourself on where it will be weak and compensate. It's simply not going to tolerate less in those cases and this does add up to missed shots. I have NOTHING close to the confidence I have with a D700 or 5DIII.

This has nothing at all to do with the AF settings. It occurs under ALL setting combinations and on every D800 I've seen/used.

Robert
 
Last edited:
rgolub wrote:

Waiting for the perfect camera has a couple of advantages. It's cheaper. You don't actually have to go out in the field and shoot. While the OPs issue may well be real for him, other photographers have managed to deal with the cameras capabilities and quirks.

It's not the fastest or best focusing camera that Nikon makes. I disagree with the OP in that I think it's on par with the D700 (he thinks it worse). Maybe for weddings it is - fluffy white lace in a poorly lit church is a very different target from some whales breaching. The OP is convinced that the AF system is much worse than on a nominally equivalent Canon body - can't comment on that.

But it's good enough for a lot of things. And it's a great camera with both a lot of strengths and a number of weaknesses. It's your responsibility to understand what you want out of a camera and how to get it.

The vast majority of us would do better photography if we just spent more time with our insufficient cameras instead of waiting for the next best thing.
+1


 
Robin Casady wrote:

I find the D800E PDAF to be more accurate and reliable than it was on my D700.
Same here. I wonder what all the fuss is about?



 
My D800 is fine. It's not perfect 100% of the time though. Sometimes there are minor errors or even major errors when shooting at f1.4 but that's the truth for every camera using autofocus. The example pictures show minor errors.. the face isn't sharp but the scarf is.. no major concern. Sometimes I even get a big miss where something like the ears are in better focus, but still EVERY SINGLE camera does this. The d4 does it, the d700 did it, the d3s did it, the 5d3 does it.. NO camera using phase detect AF is perfect. Not a single one.

Roger from lensrentals tested the d800, as well as other Nikon cameras using a properly scientific methodology and 1.4 prime lenses for the centre AF point (which is what this thread is showing). He said that the newer series (i.e. D4 and D800) are better than the older (d700 etc) in terms of consistency.


I would suggest that everybody was getting the same, or worse, AF errors on the d700 but simply 36mp is letting you notice more.
 
1) If you're happy with the D800 AF then GREAT and I'm happy for you.

2) Understand that we all place very different demands on our cameras.

3) The fairly large and CONSISTANT reports of AF problems with the D800 point towards a problem. The 5DIII, as an example, has FAR fewer reported problems.

4) I've used a good amount of D800 bodies (2 of my own then returned later body due to ridiculously bad Left AF issue) via friends and we're all seeing the same issues. Some are bothered a lot or a little depending on applications.

5) The large pool of reported problems vs. the small one for the 5DIII still add up to the same thing: Nikon's AF system is not as good on the D800.

Please understand: I really like my D800 and my Nikon lenses. Overall I find the Nikon system superior to Canon's. But just as Nikon took a front seat in sensor technology and pretty much leveled the playing field for glass, they took a back seat on auto focus.

And that's that. I'm not providing samples, "evidence" or any other nonsense. If everyone who posts there AF issues are trolls, amateurs or worse, then fine. Enjoy your camera and move on. But I know 100% that the D800 AF is second banana at the moment, just like the 5DIII sensor is second banana.

At some point you have to stop being a fanboy and simply be honest about the strengths and weaknesses of a given system. And as I said...I will enjoy my D800 until it's time for an upgrade.

Robert
 
Last edited:
u007 wrote:

I would suggest that everybody was getting the same, or worse, AF errors on the d700 but simply 36mp is letting you notice more.
Which is just another way of saying that the 2007 era PDAF system of the D800 is not up to the requirements of a 2012 era 36mp Sony sensor. Seems Nikon could have anticipated PDAF tolerances needed to be tightened in product development for the D800.
 
fPrime wrote:
u007 wrote:

I would suggest that everybody was getting the same, or worse, AF errors on the d700 but simply 36mp is letting you notice more.
Which is just another way of saying that the 2007 era PDAF system of the D800 is not up to the requirements of a 2012 era 36mp Sony sensor. Seems Nikon could have anticipated PDAF tolerances needed to be tightened in product development for the D800.
And it is tightened because my D800 (originally) and now my D800E is more accurate and faster at obtaining focus than my D700 in all light conditions.
 
Shotcents wrote:

I've been told that the D800 AF Module is a somewhat reworked version of what's in the D700, but the D800 cannot match the D700's AF prowess.
I disagree, in every way my D800 matches or exceeds my D700's performance. Roger Cicala has done an Imatest-based comparison, and the D800 actually does slightly better than the D700.

QC/variation issue?




.
 
This and other D800 AF threads show that this issue is simply too difficult to admit for many. They will disregard you and think you cannot use your gear. I'm glad this subject has been brought up, though.

I had similar problems with D3s, so this is nothing new. And D4 has this very same problem as well.
 
i agree with the OP

the D800 focusing is pure crap or crap shoot when it comes to BIF, it will nail one shot in 5, tracking with the D800 is terrible

lot of posters may post one shot of a BIF but never do i see a series of shots by these posters cause the rest of the shots will be out of focus but yet they will say the D800 focusing is the best thing since sliced bread

i have even seen a poster talk about how great his D800 is so great yet he posted a series of a bird and the only shot in focus was with the bird sitting still, the in flight shots are all missed focus

i am selling my D800 as fast as i can
 
pickled wrote:

i agree with the OP

the D800 focusing is pure crap or crap shoot when it comes to BIF, it will nail one shot in 5, tracking with the D800 is terrible

lot of posters may post one shot of a BIF but never do i see a series of shots by these posters cause the rest of the shots will be out of focus but yet they will say the D800 focusing is the best thing since sliced bread

i have even seen a poster talk about how great his D800 is so great yet he posted a series of a bird and the only shot in focus was with the bird sitting still, the in flight shots are all missed focus

i am selling my D800 as fast as i can






I don't shoot BIF, so much of the time the D800 AF works okay for me. Not great, but okay. It;s just about impossible for this to have anything to do with bad batches of cameras. That would mean that every D800 I've had contact with or heard about from people I know are "bad."

You only have to pick up a 5DIII to note the weakness of the D800 AF and I don't think most people here have done that. The 5DIII is quicker and just never misses. I'm a former 5DII owner, but I've always owned more Nikon gear.

The knowledge pool here and elsewhere indicates that the D800 AF is not as good. Period. Repeating over & over again that "you've had no problems" is not meaningful when so many have noted what I have.

It doesn't make the D800 a bad camera, just like the weaker 5DIII sensor doesn't make it a bad camera. You have to work within the limitations of ANY camera.




Robert
 
Sorry to go OT but do we know how good the D600 focus is by comparison? Just a weaker system or less ambitious and thus less prone to mis-focus???
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top