Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tamras29 wrote:
Just some thought on what you would like in an OMD-E-M6 as and when it appears?
Menu could do with tidying, but that's firmware, does not need a new camera.Corkcampbell wrote:
I'm not saying it has to be a GH3, but perhaps hacked, or even unhacked, GH2? I have two OM-D bodies which I prefer to carry, but am often finding myself taking along a GH2 for video reasons. A two year-old camera should be on ebay, not in my bag.
I have no complaint about stills from the OM-D, and I also have no - wait for it - here it comes - complaint (yes, that's NO complaint) about the menu system which everyone seems scared of...I've even heard it described as "deal-breaker" by some who have never owned or spent time with the camera.
Interesting how MFT's is for the most part intended to lessen the load of a DSLR as much as possible. So two OMD's can not do what one GH-2 or GH-3 can do now.Corkcampbell wrote:
I'm not saying it has to be a GH3, but perhaps hacked, or even unhacked, GH2? I have two OM-D bodies which I prefer to carry, but am often finding myself taking along a GH2 for video reasons. A two year-old camera should be on ebay, not in my bag.
I have no complaint about stills from the OM-D, and I also have no - wait for it - here it comes - complaint (yes, that's NO complaint) about the menu system which everyone seems scared of...I've even heard it described as "deal-breaker" by some who have never owned or spent time with the camera.
ryan2007 wrote:
Interesting how MFT's is for the most part intended to lessen the load of a DSLR as much as possible. So two OMD's can not do what one GH-2 or GH-3 can do now.Corkcampbell wrote:
I'm not saying it has to be a GH3, but perhaps hacked, or even unhacked, GH2? I have two OM-D bodies which I prefer to carry, but am often finding myself taking along a GH2 for video reasons. A two year-old camera should be on ebay, not in my bag.
I have no complaint about stills from the OM-D, and I also have no - wait for it - here it comes - complaint (yes, that's NO complaint) about the menu system which everyone seems scared of...I've even heard it described as "deal-breaker" by some who have never owned or spent time with the camera.
Wow, and I get criticized for being a Panasonic user that only uses Panasonic glass. I am not wasting my money on an OMD for the reasons mentioned here and what I realized three years ago.
I'm not picking on you, but this is yet another thread with Panasonic envy and one more check on my list why Panasonic is and i have to say better for ME. Of course I can not say the Olympus OMD is less of a camera because that would be what a troll does.
As stated above and to paraphrase: The first thought is it does not have to be a GH-3, but a hacked/unhacked GH-2 that sounds like if you want both good stills and video don't buy Olympus. In this case it was bought twice.
I am sure the OMD is a good camera just not for me today. Panasonic would have to really bomb for me to even think about anything Olympus and I am not opposed to do so. Just not today.
rrr_hhh wrote:
- Availability of a white body :-O
If you're going to enjoy playing the victim, get it right. You're not criticized for preferring a one brand solution, just for promoting it as a reasonable posture that everyone else should adopt.ryan2007 wrote:
Interesting how MFT's is for the most part intended to lessen the load of a DSLR as much as possible. So two OMD's can not do what one GH-2 or GH-3 can do now.Corkcampbell wrote:
I'm not saying it has to be a GH3, but perhaps hacked, or even unhacked, GH2? I have two OM-D bodies which I prefer to carry, but am often finding myself taking along a GH2 for video reasons. A two year-old camera should be on ebay, not in my bag.
I have no complaint about stills from the OM-D, and I also have no - wait for it - here it comes - complaint (yes, that's NO complaint) about the menu system which everyone seems scared of...I've even heard it described as "deal-breaker" by some who have never owned or spent time with the camera.
Wow, and I get criticized for being a Panasonic user that only uses Panasonic glass. I am not wasting my money on an OMD for the reasons mentioned here and what I realized three years ago.
Maybe the GH2 is just a good camera ;-)Corkcampbell wrote:
I'm not saying it has to be a GH3, but perhaps hacked, or even unhacked, GH2? I have two OM-D bodies which I prefer to carry, but am often finding myself taking along a GH2 for video reasons. A two year-old camera should be on ebay, not in my bag.
This is an area that could be improved dramatically by:I have no complaint about stills from the OM-D, and I also have no - wait for it - here it comes - complaint (yes, that's NO complaint) about the menu system which everyone seems scared of...I've even heard it described as "deal-breaker" by some who have never owned or spent time with the camera.
I know 1 thing I would really like. They can keep it entirely the same as the excellent E-M5 only for half the price.tamras29 wrote:
Just some thought on what you would like in an OMD-E-M6 as and when it appears?