moimoi
Veteran Member
Last edited:
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
If a wish list, doing a dual-EVF/OVF would fit perfectly to my need, thanks to Sony
Cheers,
zoomo
Forum Enthusiast
- Messages
- 321
- Reaction score
- 155
Same here!
Nordstjernen
Veteran Member
Then you don't need 36 Mp since mirror vibration will destroy fine detail in a wide range of shutter speeds, or you need to work in MLU mode to benefit from the very high resolution sensor. Not my choise.
Last edited:
Nordstjernen
Veteran Member
3systermuser
Leading Member
SR is not a really trusted source but I know a Alpha FF with vertical grip has been tested in Africa several times because some Japanese tech sites posted the photo of it (and that rumor photo was sent by Sony internal people).
I think this one is called Alpha 1x or Alpha 1s , either way it will be very interesting camera , a 36mp D800 type of sensor based body yet as fast as the 1Dx or the D4.
but what I am really really eargerly wasiting for from Sony is a FF Alpha with square sensor.
anyway, thanks for your post and you are right CN is too timid to bring out any kind of real serious innovation that might hurt their conservative D-SLRs, this alone makes them as boring as Casio imho, eventually people wake up and see the fact that the OVF is a thing of the past.
I think this one is called Alpha 1x or Alpha 1s , either way it will be very interesting camera , a 36mp D800 type of sensor based body yet as fast as the 1Dx or the D4.
but what I am really really eargerly wasiting for from Sony is a FF Alpha with square sensor.
anyway, thanks for your post and you are right CN is too timid to bring out any kind of real serious innovation that might hurt their conservative D-SLRs, this alone makes them as boring as Casio imho, eventually people wake up and see the fact that the OVF is a thing of the past.
G6u7a1m
Leading Member
IMHO one is almost guaranteed to be an NEX model.
Denis247
Senior Member
Hope it's got a built-in flash this time.
G6u7a1m
Leading Member
3systermuser
Leading Member
no rational people want low mp FF camera any more, the D4 is the only one accepted low mp camera but wihtout the religious level of insane Nikon cult people buying it , even the D4 cannot be existed today.
Sony is not Nikon or Leica or even not Canon, this means Sony has no cult people worshipping it , so it is not easy for Sony to go low mp FF direction.
and remember the D800 has much less noise than your A700 or the D3s at image level , you do not want to judge a camera IQ at pixel level but at image level.
Sony is not Nikon or Leica or even not Canon, this means Sony has no cult people worshipping it , so it is not easy for Sony to go low mp FF direction.
and remember the D800 has much less noise than your A700 or the D3s at image level , you do not want to judge a camera IQ at pixel level but at image level.
J Birn
Leading Member
Sure, "the high-res one" seems like a certainty. And "the cheaper one" seems necessary to compete in a market niche that should dip below $2k soon. But "the faster one" should be where SLT tech really shines.
If the faster one also does 4k video (maybe written onto two cards at once?) then it'll be an interesting option in still shooting: Imagine using 4K video as a kind of 24FPS or 30FPS "burst mode" where you could export 4K stills from any frame you wanted of what you captured.
I hope some of these introduce a full-frame AF array, too.
If the faster one also does 4k video (maybe written onto two cards at once?) then it'll be an interesting option in still shooting: Imagine using 4K video as a kind of 24FPS or 30FPS "burst mode" where you could export 4K stills from any frame you wanted of what you captured.
I hope some of these introduce a full-frame AF array, too.
3systermuser
Leading Member
>Did you know that some noise is needed to get smooth tonal and color transitions on monitors and also for prints?
exactly, pixel level noise is not a big issue but lack od details caused by low MP FF sensor like the one in the D3s is.
exactly, pixel level noise is not a big issue but lack od details caused by low MP FF sensor like the one in the D3s is.
3systermuser
Leading Member
Nikon is no longer a main customer of Sony Sensor company called SSC.
the main customer for Sony Semi corp is now olympus and panasonic.
the main customer for Sony Semi corp is now olympus and panasonic.
3systermuser
Leading Member
ddi you not know Nikon has decided not to use any more Sony sensors ?
all "current " Nikon DX has non-Sony sensors.
the D5200, the D3200 both use Renasus sensors, the D7000 has the Sony sensor but it is not a current camera , already 2 years olf junk.
all "current " Nikon DX has non-Sony sensors.
the D5200, the D3200 both use Renasus sensors, the D7000 has the Sony sensor but it is not a current camera , already 2 years olf junk.
cyainparadise
Veteran Member
Have you looked at the prices of Sony's 4K UHDTV? UHDTV is only going to be used for very large screens, as people have been putting in TVs in their homes, and then watching at a distance that they could see the pixels on a 1080P screen.
While Sony will be dropping the prices, UHDTV doesn't make sense for smaller screen sizes.
cyainparadise
Veteran Member
How do you know that Canon/Nikon won't have anything new to deliver? Canon has been very good at keeping new products under wraps until the last moment, unlike Sony, where everyone seems to like to leak their future plans.
The other day, I posted a thread about the VP at Sony Hawaii talking about major announcements upcoming for the Alpha cameras. This was picked up by SAR.
cyainparadise
Veteran Member
Is that what Nikon users are doing with their 36 MP DSLRs? Wouldn't they just need to use a shutter speed that is higher than the reciprocity of the focal length to stop the vibration?
Last edited:
yakkosmurf
Senior Member
As a landscape guy, I would love to see a Sony body with the D800 36MP sensor in it. That is what it would take for me to trade up from my a850.