Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great shots, the F series have been forgotten on the forum but the combination of camera size, reach, IQ and price makes these cameras unbeatablerube39 wrote:
. . . for ¥14,800.
Am impressed so far
rube39 wrote:
Thank you for your kind words. And I agree, the F series is way under appreciated (having had the F11 and F200, with both my wife and mother still using the F70).
CAcreeks wrote:
Nice shots! The one of construction at full zoom is a bit noisy in the grays for ISO 100, but the others are commendable.
Did you decide -.33 EV is the way to go? I am still undecided on whether to shoot that way, or uncompensated, most of the time. Whereas on the F550, -.33 EV was clearly best.
I think the main reason for using -.33 EV on the F550 was that the lens had a lot of veiling glare, which underexpose helped reduce.rube39 wrote:
Not really, and I know that there is a debate. Right now I am just trying it out.Did you decide -.33 EV is the way to go? I am still undecided on whether to shoot that way, or uncompensated, most of the time. Whereas on the F550, -.33 EV was clearly best.
Would you recommend using the F770 in 8mp mode all the time, at 0EV and using AUTO DR or dialing in the amount you thought was needed in each situation. I have also seen the F770 on sale price in Brisbane and it caught my interest.CAcreeks wrote:
I think the main reason for using -.33 EV on the F550 was that the lens had a lot of veiling glare, which underexpose helped reduce.rube39 wrote:
Not really, and I know that there is a debate. Right now I am just trying it out.Did you decide -.33 EV is the way to go? I am still undecided on whether to shoot that way, or uncompensated, most of the time. Whereas on the F550, -.33 EV was clearly best.
My F750 (and probably your F770) has better lens coatings and seems less flare-prone, so 0 EV usually works fine.
Seems to work well most of the time with KimL's settings, which is to saybrianj wrote:
Would you recommend using the F770 in 8mp mode all the time, at 0EV and using AUTO DR or dialing in the amount you thought was needed in each situation. I have also seen the F770 on sale price in Brisbane and it caught my interest.
I have been shooting in RAW, processing in LR4. Kim L finally recommend doing the same. In auto ISO I find even the 800 ISO shots quite nice. My only 'regret' is that the RAW shots come to 25mgs!brianj wrote:
Would you recommend using the F770 in 8mp mode all the time, at 0EV and using AUTO DR or dialing in the amount you thought was needed in each situation. I have also seen the F770 on sale price in Brisbane and it caught my interest.
Use a little Velcro and you don't have to carry it in a pocket. You can attach that little sucker to the D800e like a remora. BTW, how do you like it so far?painterdude wrote:
in close the cam shines ..as subject matter recedes ..so does IQ..BUT its a very very handy little cam. I carry one with me when shooting my DSLR.
CAcreeks wrote:
Seems to work well most of the time with KimL's settings, which is to say
There is a potential problem with those settings if the user is not aware:
- M (medium size) to get hardware DR 400%
- standard (Provia) color, maybe Astia for overcast weather
- Auto ISO 1600 or 3200, your choice
- JPEG Fine
Trevor G wrote:
CAcreeks wrote:Seems to work well most of the time with KimL's settings, which is to sayThere is a potential problem with those settings if the user is not aware:
- M (medium size) to get hardware DR 400%
- standard (Provia) color, maybe Astia for overcast weather
- Auto ISO 1600 or 3200, your choice
- JPEG Fine
Once ISO is higher than DR the unique, sensor pixel pairing which gives the extra 2EV+ of highlight recovery is swamped by sensor amplification instead, which is effected by raising the ISO. This makes for noisier images.
If you want hardware DR400 you need M size and ISO less than DR.
PAUL TILL wrote:
Your confused (not hard for you).........
Aha, that explains it. Trevor confused me until Paul's note.PAUL TILL wrote:
You're confused ... you appear to be talking about shooting at full resolution when CA is recommending half resolution.Trevor G wrote:
There is a potential problem with those settings if the user is not aware:
- M (medium size) to get hardware DR 400%
Once ISO is higher than DR the unique, sensor pixel pairing which gives the extra 2EV+ of highlight recovery is swamped by sensor amplification instead, which is effected by raising the ISO. This makes for noisier images.
If you want hardware DR400 you need M size and ISO less than DR.
That's what makes these 16mp models worth considering, I have been using a 10mp camera for the last few years and that is plenty. Its a pity fuji didn't put this many mp in the XF1.P.S. Because the F770 is a 16 megapixel camera, the half-resolution 8 Mp are plenty. Many highly regarded luxury P&S models are only 10 Mp.