And now that's fixed.ljfinger wrote:
They seem to have fixed that, but now the links in Recent take me to Flat View!!! Even changing it to threaded and going back will still make the links take me to Flat. I hate flat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And now that's fixed.ljfinger wrote:
They seem to have fixed that, but now the links in Recent take me to Flat View!!! Even changing it to threaded and going back will still make the links take me to Flat. I hate flat.
Still broken.fotowbert wrote:
The time may be fixed, but other problem persist.
You still can't tell which ones you have seen or not, by half white dot or brightness change.![]()
Fixed.You have to go look and when you click a thread it dumps you into "Flat View" now.![]()
That's the best theory I've heard so far.Leonard Migliore wrote:
I had assumed that the site was being revised by professional programmers who could test and evaluate any changes before springing them on the world. This assumption seems to be incorrect. Maybe it's a class project or the coding equivalent of karaoke.
as there were columns:John Sheehy wrote:
"Recent Activity" has now been rendered less usable. It no longer tells you when the last post was made to a thread which you have participated in, and sorts by that criterion, but goes by the "Date" that the thread was started! That is totally useless information. Who cares when a thread was started? I need to have the most recently replied-to threads in which I have participated in at the top of the list, not down at the bottom somewhere because the thread is a month old..
I also have never understood why "Recent Activity" has always ignored threads older than a certain amount. I want to know about ALL the threads in which I have participated. I have missed questions posed to me in year-old posts because the forum code decided that older threads are not worth mentioning. This is absurd.
I think that is what surprises me the most about DPR. They do not seem to know the concept of a staging lab. Changes seem to be implemented with little forethought and no testing.Leonard Migliore wrote:
I had assumed that the site was being revised by professional programmers who could test and evaluate any changes before springing them on the world. This assumption seems to be incorrect.
Robert Hoy wrote:
It's fixed now. Use the "feedback" link so Dpreview will see it sooner than reading forums!
top DPR staffers used to pop into UI oriented threads like this one: straight after the last big upheaval, but no morefotowbert wrote:
Not everything is fixed like we had before as mentioned by jpr2 in http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/50150320 .
The only thing I see fixed (with FF 15.0.1) is the list is now back to sorted by "last post" time with the most recent at the top.
Well, they answered by fixing it, mostly. It would be nice to have all the fields there though; the number of posts in the thread, the day it was started, and the time of the most recent post, as well as an indicator of anything yet unread.jpr2 wrote:
three days has passed and still no reaction from DPR![]()
John Sheehy wrote:
Well, they answered by fixing it, mostly. It would be nice to have all the fields there though; the number of posts in the thread, the day it was started, and the time of the most recent post, as well as an indicator of anything yet unread.jpr2 wrote:
three days has passed and still no reaction from DPR![]()
I don't know if it's better to report problems here, or use "Feedback". In the past, I found that "Feedback" was pretty much a null mailbox, designed for typing practice and nothing more. Perhaps that is no longer the case. I reported the non-working "n" keyboard shortcut and "Next" above the post in threaded view this morning, and it was fixed soon after, but of course, that may have nothing to do with my "Feedback".
Simon Joinson wrote:
John Sheehy wrote:
Well, they answered by fixing it, mostly. It would be nice to have all the fields there though; the number of posts in the thread, the day it was started, and the time of the most recent post, as well as an indicator of anything yet unread.jpr2 wrote:
three days has passed and still no reaction from DPR![]()
I don't know if it's better to report problems here, or use "Feedback". In the past, I found that "Feedback" was pretty much a null mailbox, designed for typing practice and nothing more. Perhaps that is no longer the case. I reported the non-working "n" keyboard shortcut and "Next" above the post in threaded view this morning, and it was fixed soon after, but of course, that may have nothing to do with my "Feedback".
Simon Joinson wrote:
we have always read all feedback messages. It's the first thing i do in the morning before breakfast.Simon Joinson, Editor-in-chief
dpreview.com
connect.dpreview.com
Simon Joinson wrote:
we have always read all feedback messages. It's the first thing i do in the morning before breakfast.John Sheehy wrote:
Well, they answered by fixing it, mostly. It would be nice to have all the fields there though; the number of posts in the thread, the day it was started, and the time of the most recent post, as well as an indicator of anything yet unread.jpr2 wrote:
three days has passed and still no reaction from DPR![]()
I don't know if it's better to report problems here, or use "Feedback". In the past, I found that "Feedback" was pretty much a null mailbox, designed for typing practice and nothing more. Perhaps that is no longer the case. I reported the non-working "n" keyboard shortcut and "Next" above the post in threaded view this morning, and it was fixed soon after, but of course, that may have nothing to do with my "Feedback".
Why not put Recent back like it was right before this thread started? It was better then.Simon Joinson wrote:
we have always read all feedback messages. It's the first thing i do in the morning before breakfast.