papillon_65
Forum Pro
Well I could have just taken some snaps in bright sunlight but they would not have conveyed the dark past of such a place, which was the whole point of these photo's.Hmm. Sorry to be the dissident here but converting to tinted gray-scale and adding lots of grain to reproduce what we think of as a "period" film look simply adds something that seems to me self-consciously arty. It adds phoniness rather than authenticity, IMO.
Well if the French had a problem with this I'm sure they would have made it quite clear that no photo's were to be taken. I would have respected that of course. The whole point of the existence of the village in this state is to remember what happened and it serves as a reminder of what can happen and where extremism can lead. There are many people who would not be aware of the story and it is a story that needs to be heard. To that end I have no problem taking photo's of it and re-telling the story in this way. My intent is not specifically about "art" but showing the place as it still stands and in a way that portrays the darker side of man. If you don't agree with that then that's fine but I don't feel guilty for doing it and I'm certainly not seeking to profit from it.The world is well supplied with sites that commemorate the legacy of atrocities but I'm not at all sure how (or even why, documentation aside) they should be turned into something that aspires to the condition of art. I recall walking around S21 extermination camp in Phnom Penh many years ago and although I'm not exactly over-sensitive I stopped snapping after a few frames despite the fact that the opportunities to make striking images were plentiful. Probably because the place is characterised, uniquely, by the thousands of "period" B&W portraits of the victims who passed through S21 on the way to the Choeung Ek killing fields.
Roy
--
Any problem on earth can be solved by a well aimed Pomegranate...
Tony
http://the-random-photographer.blogspot.com/